Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T09:35:47.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time-dependent rate conservation laws for a process defined with a stationary marked point process and their applications

Part of: Special processes Stochastic processes Markov processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Masakiyo Miyazawa
Masakiyo Miyazawa*
Affiliation:
Science University of Tokyo
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Information Science, Science University of Tokyo, Noda, Chiba 278, Japan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We derive two kinds of rate conservation laws for describing the time-dependent behavior of a process defined with a stationary marked point process and starting at time 0. These formulas are called TRCLs (time-dependent rate conservation laws). It is shown that TRCLs are useful to study the transient behaviors of risk and storage processes with stationary claim and supply processes and with a general premium and release rates, respectively. Detailed discussions are given for the severity for the risk process, and for the workload process of a single-server queue.

Keywords

TRANSIENT BEHAVIORRISK PROCESSRUIN TIMESEVERITYSTORAGE PROCESSWORKLOAD PROCESSSINGLE-SERVER QUEUEPALM DISTRIBUTION

MSC classification

Primary: 60G55: Point processes
Secondary: 60J70: Applications of Brownian motions and diffusion theory (population genetics, absorption problems, etc.) 60K25: Queueing theory 60K30: Applications (congestion, allocation, storage, traffic, etc.)

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 114 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abate, J. and Whitt, W. (1991) Transient behaviour of the M/GI/1 workload process. Preprint.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. (1987) Applied Probability and Queues. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. (1989) Risk theory in a Markovian environment. Scand. Actuarial J., 69–100.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. and Petersen, S. S. (1988) Ruin probabilities expressed in terms of storage processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 20, 913–916.Google Scholar
Baccelli, F. and Bremaud, P. (1987) Palm Probabilities and Stationary Queues. Lecture Notes in Statistics 41, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bremaud, P. (1991) An elementary proof of Sengupta's invariance relation and a remark on Miyazawa's conservation principle. J. Appl. Prob. 28, 950–954.Google Scholar
Bremaud, P., Kannurpatti, R. and Mazumdar, R. (1992) Events and time averages: A review. Adv. Appl. Prob. 24, 377–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, ?. H. A. (1984) Piecewise deterministic Markov processes: a general class of non-diffusion stochastic models. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 46, 353–388.Google Scholar
Dufresne, F. and Gerber, H. U. (1988) The surpluses immediately before and at ruin, and the amount of the claim causing ruin. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 7, 193–199.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. J. (1982) Stochastic Calculus and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Franken, P., König, D., Arndt, U. and Schmidt, V. (1982) Queues and Point Processes. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. (1987) On the probability and severity of ruin. Astin Bulletin 17, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. M. and Resnick, S. I. (1976) The stationary distribution and first exit probabilities of a storage process with general release rule. Math. Operat. Res. 1, 347–358.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. M. and Resnick, S. I. (1978) The recurrence classification of risk and storage processes. Math. Operat. Res. 3, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumdar, R., Kannurpatti, R. and Rosenberg, C. (1991) On rate conservation law for non-stationary processes. J. Appl. Prob. 28, 762–770.Google Scholar
Mecke, J. (1967) Stationäre zufällige Masse auf lokalkompakten Abelschen Gruppen. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 9, 36–58.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, M. (1983) The derivation of invariance relations in complex queueing systems with stationary inputs. Adv. Appl. Prob. 15, 874–885.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, M. (1985) The intensity conservation law for queues with randomly changed service rate. J. Appl. Prob. 22, 408–418.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, M. and Schmidt, V. (1993) On ladder height distributions of general risk processes. Ann. Appl. Prob. 3, 763–776.Google Scholar
Mori, M. (1976) Transient behaviour of the mean waiting time and its exact forms in M/M/1 and M/D/1. J. Operat. Res. Japan 19, 14–31.Google Scholar
Petersen, S. S. (1990) Calculation of ruin probabilities when the premium depends on the current reserve. Scand. Actuarial J., 147–159.Google Scholar
Sigman, K. (1991) A note on a sample-path rate conservation law and its relationship with H = ?G. Adv. Appl. Prob. 23, 662–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, W. (1991) A review of L = λW and extensions. Queueing Systems 9, 235–268.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. W. (1989) Stochastic Modeling and The Theory of Queues. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar