Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:55:25.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Traits associated with high yield in barley in low-rainfall environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. Acevedo ,
P. Q. Craufurd ,
R. B. Austin  and
P. Pérez-Marco
E. Acevedo
Affiliation:
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
P. Q. Craufurd
Affiliation:
Institute for Plant Science Research, Cambridge Laboratory, Marts Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2JB, UK
R. B. Austin
Affiliation:
Institute for Plant Science Research, Cambridge Laboratory, Marts Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2JB, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Results are reported from nine field trials carried out in 1985/86 and 1986/87 aimed at identifying plant traits which are associated with high yield in barley in low-rainfall Mediterranean areas. Thirtyseven two-rowed and 35 six-rowed genotypes, representing the known diversity in traits considered to be useful, were compared in trials at three sites differing in expected annual rainfall (212–328 mm) in northern Syria, and in droughted and irrigated trials at Cambridge, UK. Yield, its components and other morphological and developmental traits were measured and correlations calculated.

Grain yields of the two- and six-rowed groups of genotypes were similar at all sites except in the irrigated trial in Cambridge, where the six-rowed genotypes gave the highest yield. Aside from the known difference in number of ears and number of grains/ear between two- and six-rowed genotypes, the simple correlations between grain yield and measured traits suggested that important traits for high yield in two- and six-rowed genotypes in dry environments were prostrate habit, vigorous seedling growth, good ground cover, early ear emergence, many ears/m2 and large grains. In the two-rowed genotypes, short stature and a short grain-filling period were also important, while in the six-rowed genotypes, tall stature, high straw yield, many grains/ear and long peduncles were important. Correlations of these characters with an index of drought susceptibility and with yield adjusted for yield potential and date of ear emergence supported the conclusions based on the simple correlations.

The physiological basis of the correlated traits is discussed and the implications for breeding are considered.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 116 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 23 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Acevedo, E. (1987). Assessing crop and plant attributes for cereal improvement in water-limited Mediterranean environments. In Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals (Eds Srivastava, J. P., Porceddu, E., Acevedo, E. & Varma, S.), pp. 303–320. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Acevedo, E. (in press). Morphophysiological traits of adaptation of cereals to Mediterranean environments. In Proceedings of an International Symposium on Improving Winter Cereals under Temperature and Soil Salinity Stresses, 26–29 October 1987, Cordoba, Spain.Google Scholar
Acevedo, E., Pérez-Marco, P. & Van Oosterom, E. (in press). Physiology of yield of wheat and barley in stressed Mediterranean environments. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Physiology, 15–20 February 1988, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B. (1987). Some crop characteristics of wheat and their influence on yield and water use. In Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals (Eds Srivastava, J. P., Porceddu, E., Acevedo, E. & Varma, S.); pp. 321–335, Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B. & Blackwell, R. D. (1980). Edge and neighbour effects in cereal yield trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 731–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B., Morgan, C. L., Ford, M. A. & Blackwell, R. D. (1980). Contributions to grain yield from preanthesis assimilation in tall and dwarf phenotypes in two contrasting seasons. Annals of Botany 45, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidinger, F. R., Mahalakshmi, V. & Rao, G. D. P. (1987). Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke). II. Estimation of genotype resistance to stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidinger, F. R., Musgrave, R. B. & Fischer, R. A. (1977). Contribution of stored pre-anthesis assimilate to grain yield in wheat and barley. Nature 270, 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. C., Keatinge, J. D. H., Gregory, P. J. & Cooper, P. J. M. (1987). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in northern Syria. 1. Root and shoot growth. Field Crops Research 16, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, S. (1987). Yield potential and drought tolerance of segregating populations of barley in contrasting environments. Euphytica 36, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S. & Van Leur, J. A. G. (1987). Genetic diversity in barley landraces from Syria and Jordan. Euphytica 36, 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Gregory, P. J., Keatinge, J. D. H. & Brown, S. C. (1987 a). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in northern Syria. 2. Soil water dynamics and crop water use. Field Crops Research 16, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Gregory, P. J., Tully, D. & Harris, H. C. (1987 b). Improving water use efficiency of annual crops in the rainfed farming system of west Asia and north Africa. Experimental Agriculture 23, 113–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Keatinge, J. D. H. & Hughes, G. (1983). Crop evapotranspiration – a technique for calculation of its components by field measurement. Field Crops Research 7, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craufurd, P. Q., Clipson, N. J., Austin, R. B. & Acevedo, E. (in press). An approach to defining an ideotype for barley in low-rainfall Medíterranean environments. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Improving Winter Cereals Under Temperature and Soil Salinity Stresses, 26–29 October 1987, Cordoba, Spain.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1981). Optimizing the use of water and nitrogen through breeding of crops. Plant and Soil 58, 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1985). Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. 1. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Wood, J. T. (1979). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. III. Yield associations with morpho-physiological traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 1001–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R. J. & Schultz, J. E. (1984). Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 743–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J., Shepherd, K. D. & Cooper, P. J. (1984). Effects of fertilizer on root growth and water use of barley in northern Syria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, P. & Blackwell, R. D. (1981). The effect of drought on the water use and yield of two spring wheat genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 603–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry areas (1988). Cereal Improvement Program Annual Report 1987. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Riggs, T. J. (1978). Developmental consequences of two-row and six-row ear type in spring barley. 2. Shoot apex, leaf and tiller development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. A. (1987). Physiology and the breeding of winter-grown cereals for dry areas. In Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals (Eds Srivastava, J. P., Porceddu, E., Acevedo, E. & Varma, S.), pp. 133–149. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Shepherd, K. D. (1985). Growth and yield of barley in Mediterranean-type environments. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Shepherd, K. D., Cooper, P. J. M., Allan, A. Y., Drennan, D. S. H. & Keatinge, J. D. H. (1987). Growth, water use and yield of barley in Mediterranean-type environments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltzien, E. & Fischbeck, G. (1988). Genotypic variability and productivity of local landraces under marginal growing conditions in Syria. In Arid Lands Today and Tomorrow (Eds Whitehead, E., Hutchinson, C. F., Timmermann, B. N. & Varady, R. G.), pp. 511–522. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar