Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T05:33:26.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sweating in cattle. III. Mechanism of water transportation through the skin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. C. Taneja
G. C. Taneja
Affiliation:
School of Physiology, University of Queensland, Brisbane and College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Mhow (M.P.), India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two calves (Zebu × Australian Illawara Shorthorn and Shorthorn) of about 7–8 months of age were exposed to controlled atmospheric conditions. Cutaneous evaporation from the belly area of these calves was measured by the capsule method. Records of the temperature of the skin under test and that of the air passed over the skin was also maintained.

The amount of water passing through the cattle skin was proportional to the difference between the saturated water-vapour pressure at skin temperature and the water-vapour pressure in the air. Tests were made for the water-vapour pressure difference varying from 9 to 25 mm. Hg.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , February 1959 , pp. 62 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Buettner, K. (1953). J. Appl. Physiol. 6, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. D. & Yang, S. H. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerslake, D. M. (1954). Proc. Physiol. Soc. (12–13 11) 1954.Google Scholar
Kuno, Y. (1934). Physiology of Human Perspiration. J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Lang, N. A. (1946). Hand Book of Chemistry. Handbook publishers, Inc. Ohio.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. (1930). Lancet, ii, 561, 617, 673, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, R. E., Lee, D. H. K. & Fohrman, M. H. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 13, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinson, E. A. (1942). Amer. J. Physiol. 137, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taneja, G. C. (1956). Nature, Lond., 177, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taneja, G. C. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. L. & Buettner, K. (1953). J. Appl. Physiol. 6, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, A. G. R., Hancock, W. & Haldane, J. S. (1932). Proc. Roy. Soc. 111, 412.Google Scholar