Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-25T00:51:32.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the habits of Zebu cattle VI. The results on different pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. W. Harker ,
D. H. L. Rollinson ,
J. I. Taylor ,
R. N. Gourlay  and
W. R. Nunn
K. W. Harker
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
D. H. L. Rollinson
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
J. I. Taylor
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
R. N. Gourlay
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
W. R. Nunn
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The data collected during 26 days of cattle watching have been examined. Differences in the distribution of the habits, and of the length of time spent on each habit, larger than those recorded by other workers, are given. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed; part of the variations may have been caused by individual behaviour, and part by changes in climatic conditions. It is concluded that the major cause of variation is the difference between the herbage quantity and quality on the different pastures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1961 , pp. 137 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Fisher, R. A. (1936). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1950). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 32 (4), 22.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1950a). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 18, 249.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1953). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 21, 1.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 420.Google Scholar
Harker, K. W., Taylor, J. I. & Rollinson, D. H. L. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 193.Google Scholar
Harker, K. W., Taylor, J. I. & Rollinson, D. H. L. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 257, 44.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. P. & Reid, D. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Wallace D. B. & Kennedy, K. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 190.Google Scholar
Lampkin, G. H., Quarterman, J. & Kidner, M. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 211.Google Scholar
Larkin, R. M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 257.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D. H. L., Harker, K. W., Taylor, J. I. & Leech, F. B. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 1.Google Scholar
Seath, D. M. & Miller, G. D. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 199.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. I., Rollinson, D. H. L. & Habker, K. W. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 257.Google Scholar
Waite, R., Macdonald, W. B. & Holmes, W. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 163.Google Scholar