Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-tldsr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-04T15:29:56.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of maize to copper and sulphur in tropical regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. O. Ojeniyil  and
G. O. Kayode
S. O. Ojeniyil
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, Federal University of Technology, PMB 704, Akure, Nigeria
G. O. Kayode
Affiliation:
Ondo State Agricultural Development Programme, PMB 622, Akure, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field studies were conducted in order to determine the components of yield and response of maizeto soil applied copper and sulphur in the rainforest-savannah transition zone and Guinea savannah zone of Nigeria. Five CuO treatments, 0, 1, 3, 6 and 9 kg/ha, were applied to maize in 1988–90, and grain yield was consistently and significantly increased by the 1 kg/ha CuO treatment. Five S treatments, 0, 10, 20, 40 and 80 kg/ha, were applied to maize in 1989–90, and all treatments increased grain yield significantly in 1989, but only the 10 kg/ha S treatment increased grain yield significantly in 1990. Higher amounts of applied S increased leaf S significantly in the Guinea savannah zone.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 120 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 295 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Acquaye, D. K. & Kang, B. T. (1987). Sulfur status and forms in some surface soils of Ghana. Soil Science 144, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adetunji, M. T. & Adepetu, J. A. (1989). Sulfur fertilization requirements of Southwestern Nigerian soils. Ife Journal of Agriculture 11, 20–33.Google Scholar
Agroola, A. A. & Corey, R. B. (1976). Nutrient deficiency survey of maize in Western Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Science 10, 1–13.Google Scholar
Chude, V. O. & Obigbesan, G. O. (1982). Copper and zinc status of tree crop plantation soils in Southwestern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 3, 1–13.Google Scholar
Enwezor, W. O. (1976). Sulfur deficiency in soils of Southeastern Nigeria. Geoderma 15, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, B. T. & Osiname, O. A. (1976). Sulfur response of maize in western Nigeria. Agronomy Journal 68, 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayode, G. O. (1990). Sulfur nutrition of cowpea in the rainforest and savannah regions of Nigeria. Fertilizer Research 23, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayode, G. O. & Agroola, A. A. (1983). Investigation on the use of macro-and micro-nutrients to improve maize yield in South Western Nigeria. Fertilizer Research 4, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinkenberg, K. & Higgins, G. M. (1968). An outline of Northern Nigeria soils. Nigerian Journal of Science 21, 81–115.Google Scholar
Russell, E. W. (1973). Soil Conditions and Plant Growth, 10th edition. Longman.Google Scholar
Sanford, J. O. & Lancaster, J. D. (1962). Biological and chemical evaluation of the readily available sulfur status of Mississippi soils. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 26, 63–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department Of Agriculture (1975). Soil Classification. A Comprehensive System (7th approximation).Google Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method of determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar