Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T16:26:45.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on B. radigicola, Beijk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Gibson
T. Gibson
Affiliation:
(Bacteriology Department, The Edinburgh and East of Scotland College of Agriculture.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Cultures of B. radicicola derived from eight different host plants have been studied and a description is given of the morphology and reproductive processes of the organisms.

2. The growth forms described include rods, coccoids, branched forms, gonidangia, gonidia and dwarfed growth, and microcysts.

3. The different cell types represent normal stages in the development of the organisms.

4. The reproductive processes described are fission, budding, liberation of gonidia, formation of regenerative bodies, and germination.

5. The formation of symplasm and the regeneration of cells is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1928 , pp. 76 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

(1)Beijbbinck, M. W. (1888). Bot. Ztg. 46, 725–735, 741–750, 757–771, 781–790, 797–804.Google Scholar
(2)Bewley, W. F. and Hutchinson, H. B. (1920). Journ. Agric. Sci. 10, 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Buchanan, R. E. (1909). Centrbl. f. Bakt. II Abt. 23, 59–91.Google Scholar
(4)Dawson, M. (1900). Proceed. Roy. Soc. London, 66, 63–65.Google Scholar
(5)Dobell, C. C. (1911). Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. 56, 395–506.Google Scholar
(6)Gangulee, N. (1926). Ann. App. Biol. 13, 360–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Greig-Smith, R. (1900). Proceed. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, 24, 653–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Guilliekmond, A. (1920). The Yeasts. Trans, by Tanner, F. W.New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Lankester, E. R. (1876). Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. N.S. 16, 27–40.Google Scholar
(10)Löhnis, F. (1905). Centrbl. f. Bakt. II Abt. 14, 582–597.Google Scholar
(11)Löhnis, F. (1921). Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington, 16, No. 2.Google Scholar
(12)Löhnis, F. and Hansen, R. (1921). Journ. Agric. Res. 20, 543–555.Google Scholar
(13)Löhnis, F. and Smith, N. R. (1916). Journ. Agric. Res. 6, 675–702.Google Scholar
(14)Löhnis, F. and Smith, N. R. (1923). Journ. Agric. Res. 23, 401–432.Google Scholar
(15)Nobbe, F. and Hiltner, L. (1893). Landw. Vers. Stat. 42, 461.Google Scholar
(16)Prazmowski, A. (1890). Landw. Vers. Stat. 37, 161–238.Google Scholar
(17)Schneider, A. (1902). Bot. Gazette, 34, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Thornton, H. G. and Gangulee, N. (1926). Proceed. Roy. Soc. London, B, 99, 427–451.Google Scholar
(19)Toenniessen, E. (1913). Central. f. Bakt. I Abt. Orig. 69, 391–412.Google Scholar
(20)Toenniessen, E. (1914). Cenlrbl. f. Bald. I Abt. Orig. 73, 241–277.Google Scholar