Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T03:14:53.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Levels of first winter feeding in relation to performance of Cheviot hill ewes. I. Body growth and development during treatment period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. G. Gunn
R. G. Gunn
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Over 3 years, different levels of first winter nutrition were imposed on groups of North and South Country Cheviot ewe hoggs (lambs). In 1956–57, three levels, high, mid and low, were fed indoors. In 1957-58, only two levels, high and mid, were fed indoors, with the low level being represented by hill wintering. In 1958–59, two levels were represented by away wintering and hill wintering.

2. Low-plane feeding was designed to simulate average hill wintering, creating a 10% loss in live weight. Mid-plane feeding was designed to maintain live weight at approximately the same level throughout the winter. High-plane feeding was designed to produce a live-weight gain of 15–20% in 1956–57 and the maximum gain possible in 1957–58.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 99 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownme, W. M. (1954). Brit. Vet. J. 110, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coop, I. E. & Clark, V. R. (1955). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. (A), 37, 214.Google Scholar
Davies, A. J. & Hibler, J. W. (1957). Agriculture, Lond., 64, 396.Google Scholar
Davies, G. M. (1950). J. Minist. Agric. 57, 379.Google Scholar
Davies, G. M. (1954–1955). Scot. Agric. 34, 149.Google Scholar
Esplin, A. C., Madsen, M. A. & Phillips, R. W. (1940). Utah Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. p. 292.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H. (1937). Scot. J. Agric. 20, 166.Google Scholar
Hendrie, W. (1960). Fmg News, Glasg. 112, 1, 95.Google Scholar
Munro, J. (1954). Ph.D. Thesis, Aberdeen University.Google Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1958). Unpublished Report.Google Scholar
Roberton, R. J. (1952). Scot. Agric. 32, 12.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. F. (1953). Scot. Agric. 33, 83.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. F. (1956). Scot. Agric. 35, 132.Google Scholar
Robson, J. Jnr, (1930). Trans. High. Agric. Soc. Scot. 42, 63.Google Scholar
Smith, I. R. C. (1890). Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
Smith, R. G. C. (1949). Scot. Agric. 29, 94.Google Scholar
Smith, R. G. C. (1953–1954). Scot. Agric. 33, 140.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th editionIowa State College, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Stewart, I. M. (1959). Scot. Agric. 39, 153.Google Scholar
Symon, J. A. (1959). Scottish Farming Past and Present, p. 273. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. (1945). J. Minist. Agric. 52, 350.Google Scholar