Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T19:19:08.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intra-ruminal particle size reduction in deer fed fresh perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) or chicory (Cichorium intybus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Kusmartono ,
A. Shimada ,
K. J. Stafford  and
T. N. Barry
Kusmartono
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
A. Shimada
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
K. J. Stafford
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
T. N. Barry
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pure swards of chicory (Cichorium intybus) and perennial ryegrass {Lolium perenne)were grown at Palmerston North, New Zealand. They were cut daily and fed fresh at 2 kg dry matter (DM)/day to ten hand-reared rumen fistulated castrated red deer stags kept in metabolism crates in April and October 1994. The efficiency of particle breakdown during the time allowed for rumination (<C.PART>) to below the critical size required to leave the rumen (passage through a 1 mm sieve) and jaw activities (i.e. eating and ruminating) were measured. Total eating time and the number of eating bouts were similar for deer fed each forage, but deer fed chicory had a greater chewing rate during eating (97·4 v. 81·0 chews/min), and a higher number of chews/g DM eaten (36·2 v. 31·5). Deer fed chicory had lower total ruminating time (30 v. 257 min/22·5 h), lower number of boli ruminated (38 v. 440/22·5 h), lower number of rumination bouts (5·4 v. 16·2/22·5 h) and less chews per minute ruminating (16·5 v. 44·3) than those fed perennial ryegrass. Of the ten deer used to measure (<C.PART>), only four ruminated when fed chicory compared with nine when fed perennial ryegrass.

Deer fed chicory had a higher efficiency of particle breakdown (<C.PART>; 0-64 v. 0·42), higher fractional degradation of particles > 1 mm (9·2 v. 5·1 %/h) and faster fractional disappearance of total DM from the rumen (10·2 v. 5·3 %/h). All three measurements for chicory were similar in deer that did or did not ruminate, but with perennial ryegrass, all values were considerably reduced in the deer that did not ruminate.

It was concluded that chicory can be broken down faster in the rumen, with less rumination being required than for perennial ryegrass, and that some deer (60%) could break down swallowed chicory to below the critical particle size without ruminating at all. The faster clearance of DM from the rumen explains the high voluntary feed intake (VFI) of deer grazing chicory. Future research needs to be done to partition rumen fractional disappearance rate into its components, rumen fractional degradation rate and rumen fractional outflow rate in deer fed chicory and perennial ryegrass.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 525 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, R. W. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1970). Pasture quality and ruminant nutrition. II. Carbohydrate and lignin composition of detergent-extracted residues from pasture grasses and legumes. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. L., Faichney, G. J. & Sinclair, R. E. (1982). Role of computer simulation in overcoming nutritional limitations to animal production from pastures. In Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures (Ed. Hacker, J. B.), pp. 473–493. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Domingue, B. M. F., Dellow, D. W., Wilson, P. R. & Barry, T. N. (1991 a). Comparative digestion in deer, goats, and sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingue, B. M. F., Dellow, D. W. & Barry, T. N. (1991 b). The efficiency of chewing during eating and ruminating in goats and sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dryden, G. Mcl., Stafford, K. J., Waghorn, G. C. & Barry, T. N. (1995). Comminution of roughages by red deer (Cervus elaphus) during the prehension of feed. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 125, 407–414.Google Scholar
Hoskin, S. O., Stafford, K. J. & Barry, T. N. (1995). Digestion, rumen fermentation and chewing behaviour of red deer fed fresh chicory and perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusmartono, , Barry, T. N., Wilson, P. R, Kemp, P. D. & Stafford, K. J. (1996). Effects of grazing chicory (Cichoriwn intybus) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)/ white clover (Trifolium repens) pasture upon the growth and voluntary feed intake of red and hybrid deer during lactation and post-weaning growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 127, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A., MacRae, J. C, Spence, A. M. & Wilson, S. (1978). A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the red deer (Cervus elaphus). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niezen, J. H., Barry, T. N., Hodgson, J., Wilson, P. R., Ataja, A. M., Parker, W. J. & Holmes, C. W. (1993). Growth responses in red deer calves and hinds grazing red clover, chicory or perennial ryegrass/white clover swards during lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Minson, D. J. & Ternouth, J. H. (1981). Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. I. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time in reticulo-rumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, K. J., Reid, C. S. W., Barry, T. N. & Suttie, J. M. (1992). Ruminoreticular motility in red deer. Proceedings of a Deer Course for Veterinarians, New Zealand Veterinary Association 9, 124–135.Google Scholar
Stafford, K. J., Reid, C. S. W., Barry, T. N. & Suttie, J. M. (1993). Rumino-reticular motility in red deer (Cervus elaphus) fed chaffed lucerne hay during winter and summer. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (1987). SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. (1984). Pasture composition and animal production. In Ruminant Physiology: Concepts and Consequences (Eds Baker, S. K., Gawthorne, J. M., Mackintosh, J. B. & Purser, D. B.), pp. 195–203. Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Dellow, D. W., John, A., Reid, C. S. W. & Waghorn, G. C. (1986). Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the reticulo-rumen. In The Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology (Eds Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. & Dobson, A.), pp. 488–517. New Jersey: Reston Books.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar