Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T19:12:42.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of age of lambs on the ketogenicity of butyrate and tolerance to exogenous glucose in vivo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. G. Manns  and
J. M. Boda
J. G. Manns
Affiliation:
University of California, Department of Animal Husbandry, Davis
J. M. Boda
Affiliation:
University of California, Department of Animal Husbandry, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The blood ketone body response to butyrate (2-5mM. butyrate/kg.) and glucose tolerance (1.25 mM. glucose/kg.) were studied in lambs as a function of age. Ketonemias produced by butyrate increased with age. This finding is compatible with an increased mass of ketone body synthesizing tissue, and by an increased activity per unit of tissue weight. In the period shortly after birth, blood glucose levels and glucose tolerance were high, but both of these measurements declined with increasing age and associated development of rumen function.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , December 1966 , pp. 377 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Boda, J. M., Riley, P. & Wegner, T. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hird, F. J. R. & Weidemann, M. J. (1964 a). Biochem. J. 92, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hird, F. J. R. & Weidemann, M. J. (1964 b). Biochem. J. 93, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, I. G., Jones, G. B. & Potter, B. J. (1964). Biochem. J. 90, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, I. G. & Potter, B. J. (1952). Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 30, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manns, J. G. & Boda, J. M.Am. J. Physiol. (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
Mccandless, E. L. & Dye, J. A. (1950). Am. J. Physiol. 162, 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peden, V. H. (1964). J. Lab. din. Med. 63, 332.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. J. (1952). Biochem. J. 51, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 160, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Simmonds, R. A. (1962). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. & Coombe, J. B. (1961). Aust. J. agric. Res. 12, 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar