Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T11:32:24.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of diets deficient in phosphorus, phosphorus and vitamin D, or calcium, on the skeleton and teeth of the growing sheep III. The composition and structure of the teeth. III. The composition and structure of the teeth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. R. McRoberts ,
R. Hill  and
A. C. Dalgarno
M. R. McRoberts
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
R. Hill
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
A. C. Dalgarno
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The teeth of sheep that had been fed from 6 months of age for 12 months on diets low in calcium or in phosphorus and vitamin D content were compared with those of similar animals fed a control diet.

2. The low calcium diet depressed the development of both dentine and enamel but had a greater effect on enamel than dentine, while the low phosphorus and vitamin D diet depressed dentine development slightly and had practically no effect on enamel.

3. The percentages of ash of the dentine and enamel were not significantly affected by the diets fed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , August 1965 , pp. 15 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Clark, E. P. & Collip, J. B. (1925). J. Biol. Ghem. 63, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engfeldt, B. & Hammorlund-Essler, E. (1957). Ada Odontol. Scand. 14, 293.Google Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, Y. (1925). J. Biol. Chem. 66, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, W. E. & Irving, J. T. (1940). J. Physiol. 99, 18.Google Scholar
Kabshan, M. (1931a). J. Dent. Res. 11, 64.Google Scholar
Karshan, M. (1931b). J. Dent. Res. 11, 137.Google Scholar
McRoberts, M. R., Hill, R. & Dalgarno, A. C. (1965a). J. Agric. Sci. 65, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRoberts, M. R., Hill, R. & Dalgarno, A. C. (1965b). J. Agric. Sci. 65, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, E. B. & Brain, E. B. (1949). Brit. Dent. J. 86, 1.Google Scholar
Manly, R. S. & Hodge, H. C. (1939). J. Dent. Res. 18, 133.Google Scholar
Mellanby, M. (1929). Spec. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Goun., Lond., 140.Google Scholar
Schour, I. & Massler, M. (1945a). J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. 32, 714.Google Scholar
Schour, I. & Massler, M. (1945b). J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. 32, 871.Google Scholar
Schour, I. & Massler, M. (1945c). J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. 32, 1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schour, I. & Massler, M. (1945d). J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. 32, 1139.Google Scholar
Sobel, A. E. (1960). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 85, 96.Google Scholar
Tinsley, J., Taylor, T. G. & Moore, J. H. (1951). Analyst, 76, 300.Google Scholar