Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T01:04:47.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of conceptus growth on the contents of the maternal gastrointestinal tract in ewes fed at a constant rate throughout gestation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. J. Faichney ,
G. A. White  and
J. B. Donnelly
G. J. Faichney
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, P.O. Box 239, Blacktown, 2148, New South Wales, Australia
G. A. White
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, P.O. Box 239, Blacktown, 2148, New South Wales, Australia
J. B. Donnelly
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Mathematics and Statistics, P.O. Box 239, Blacktown, 2148, New South Wales, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Multiparous Corriedale ewes were maintained on a constant feed intake such that the body weight (i.e. live weight less gravid uterus) of single-bearing ewes at the end of gestation approximated their live weight at mating. The ewes were allocated to one of five groups, designated for slaughter at 0, 50, 90, 120 and 140 days of gestation. At slaughter, the gravid uterus was removed, weighed and its components dissected out and the contents of all sections of the gastro-intestinal tract were removed, weighed and sampled.

Foetal growth was described by a Gompertz model. It was predicted that, at day 150, a twin foetus would have been 0·95 of the weight of a single foetus but this difference was not statistically significant. The foetal proportion of the gravid uterus followed a sigmoid curve during gestation to reach a predicted value of 0·60 at day 150. Predicted birth weights represented 10·4 and 18·6% of maternal body weight in single- and twin-bearing ewes.

The digesta content of the rumen and of the whole gastro-intestinal tract was not significantly affected by gestation. However, there was a tendency for the values to decline to day 90, then increase during the last third of gestation. It was suggested that the decline was due to hormonal rather than direct physical effects. By contrast, the amounts of organic digesta constituents in the rumen descreased as gestation progressed (P < 0·01) indicating an effect of gestation on rumen propulsive activity.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 110 , Issue 3 , June 1988 , pp. 435 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Faichney, G. J. (1983). Assessment of the protein value of ruminant feeds. In Feed Information, and Animal Production (ed. Bobards, G. E. and Packham, R. G.), pp. 191–210. Farnham Royal, U.K.: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & White, G. A. (1979). The net utilization of inorganic sulphur by rumen microbes. Annales de Recherche Vétérinaires 10, 280–282.Google ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G. J. & White, G. A. (1980). Mean retention time of markers in the rumen of pregnant sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 455.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & White, G. A. (1983). Methods for the Analysis of Feeds Eaten by Ruminants. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & White, G. A. (1988 a). Rates of passage of solutes, microbes and particulate matter through the gastro-intestinal tract of ewes fed at a constant rate throughout gestation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & White, G. A. (1988 b). Partition of organic matter, fibre and protein digestion in ewes fed at a constant rate throughout gestation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J., White, G. A. & Quinlan, D. (1982). Water intake, ketonaemia and renal function in sheep in late pregnancy. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 7, 204.Google Scholar
Fell, B. F. (1972). Adaptations of the digestive tract during reproduction in the mammal. In World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 14, pp. 180–256. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Foot, J. Z. & Geeenhalgh, J. F. D. (1970). A note on the relation between weights of alimentary tract contents, body fat and the uterus in Blackface ewes. Animal Production 12, 669–671.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1968). The physical relationships of the abdominal organs in the pregnant ewe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 171–177.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1969). The effect of pregnancy and fatness on the volume of rumen contents in the ewe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Black, J. L., Faichney, G. J. & Arnold, G. W. (1976). Simulation of growth and production in sheep-Model 1. Agricultural Systems 1, 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koong, L. J., Garrett, W. N. & Rattray, P. V. (1975). A description of the dynamics of fetal growth in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 41, 1065–1068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mäkelä, A. (1956). Studies on the question of bulk in the nutrition of farm animals with special reference to cattle. Ada Agralia Fennica 85, 1–130.Google Scholar
Miller, A. J. (1981). LMM – a subroutine for unconstrained non-linear least-squares fitting. CSIRO Division of Mathematics and Statistics Report No. VT81/23.Google Scholar
Osborne, M. R. (1976). Non linear least squares-the Levenberg algorithm revisited. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society B19, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, H. M., Watson, R. H. & Wood, G. F. (1960). A crayon and associated harness for the detection of mating under field conditions. Australian Veterinary Journal 36, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Garrett, W. N., East, N. E. & Hinman, N. (1974). Growth, development and composition of the ovine conceptus and mammary gland during pregnancy. Journal of Animal Science 38, 613–626.Google Scholar
Robbins, C. T. & Robbins, B. L. (1979). Fetal and neonatal growth patterns and maternal reproductive effort in ungulates and subungulates. American Naturalist 114, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. & McDonald, I. (1979). Ovine prenatal growth, its mathematical description and the effects of maternal nutrition. Annales de Biologie Animale Biochmie Biophysique 19 (1B), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I., Fraser, C. & Crofts, R. M. J. (1977). Studies on reproduction in proflic ewes. 1. Growth of the products of the products of conception. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88 539–552.Google Scholar