Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T18:37:29.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of the digestive system of the young; animal. VII. The total and partial apparent digestibility of a pelletted diet by lambs and adult sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. M. Walker  and
M. K. Campbell
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Australia
M. K. Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Fifteen male Merino lambs suckling the ewe and four adult Merino wethers were fed the same pelletted diet. The lambs had free access to milk from the ewe and were creep-fed the pelletted diet. Feed intake by each lamb was measured daily.

2. The digestibility of the dry matter of the pelletted diet was determined in a conventional total collection trial with the adult wethers. Dry-matter and crude-protein digestibility "was determined in the lambs on faeces taken at, or just before, slaughter by the lignin-ratio method.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , April 1965 , pp. 279 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armstrong, D. G., Preston, T. R. & Armstrong, R. H. (1954). Nature, Lond., 174, 1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badawy, A. M., Campbell, R. M., Cuthbertson, D. P., Fell, B. F. & Mackie, W. S. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A., Balch, C. C. & Rowland, S. J. (1954). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, G. H., Matrone, G. & Maynard, L. A. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, F. V. (1947). J. Exp. Biol. 24, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, E. B., Duncan, C. W. & Huffman, C. F. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, E. B., Duncan, C. W. & Huffman, C. F. (1947 a). J. Nutr. 34, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, E. B., Duncan, C. W. & Huffman, C. F. (1947 b). J. Nutr. 34, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, A. T. G. (1957). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 38A, 696.Google Scholar
Rogerson, A. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Walker, G. J. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar