Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-2bdfx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T15:37:04.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The control of bacterial blight in rain-grown cotton. II. Some effects of infection on growth and yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. H. Arnold
M. H. Arnold
Affiliation:
Empire Cotton Growing Corporation, Cotton Research Station, Namulonge, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three series of experiments are described from which minimum estimates of crop loss caused by bacterial blight were obtained. In the first two, the estimates were derived from seed-dressing trials, and in the third, seed dressing was used in conjunction with resistant varieties.

Losses amounted to as much as 354 ± 39 lb. seed cotton/acre for a susceptible variety but could be reduced both by seed dressing and by using resistant varieties. The effectiveness of resistance in moderately resistant varieties varied from one season to the next, an effect comparable with the genotype-environment interactions previously described for reactions to inoculation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , August 1965 , pp. 29 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnold, M. H. (1956). Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas., Lake Province, Tanganyika, 1954–1955, p. 14. Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. H. (1957). West African Res. Gonf., Samaru, Northern Nigeria, p. 159.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. H. (1963).J. Agric. Sci. 60, 415.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. H. & Arnold, K. M. (1960). Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas., Lake Province, Tanganyika, 1958–59, p. 8. Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. H. & Arnold, K. M. (1961). Emp. Cott. Gr. Rev. 38, 258.Google Scholar
Cross, J. E. (1963). Emp. Cott. Or. Rev. 40, 125.Google Scholar
Fabbrother, H. G. (1958). Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas., Uganda, 1957–58, p. 21. Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp.Google Scholar
Peat, J. E. & Motcro, J. M. (1952). Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas., Lake Province, Tanganyika, 1950–51, p. 1. Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp.Google Scholar
Peat, J. E., Munro, J. M. & Arnold, M. H. (1955).Prog. Rep. Exp. Stas., Lake Province, Tanganyika, p. 1. 1953–54. Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp.Google Scholar
Wickens, G. M. (1956). Ann. Appl. Biol. 44, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickens, G. M. (1961). Emp. Cott. Or. Rev. 38, 241.Google Scholar
Wickens, G. M. & Logan, C. (1960). Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas., Uganda, 1958–59, p. 38. Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp.Google Scholar
Williams, E. J. (1959). Regression Analysis, p. 195New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar