Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:31:04.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The composition and digestibility, when fed to pigs and sheep, of potato cossettes and potato meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Woodman  and
R. E. Evans
H. E. Woodman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge University
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Artificially dried potatoes are being marketed in this country at the present time in two grades, known as potato cossettes and potato meal. “Chat” potatoes are first washed in water tanks provided with revolving paddles and are then elevated into a machine that pulps them into pieces about the size of fingers. The resulting cossettes enter the drier directly from the pulper, forming a layer about 4 in deep. The wet material passes on an endless conveyer, consisting of a drying belt of perforated sheet metal, through three zones of temperature. The hot-air current has a temperature of 250–260° F. in the first stage and 180–200° F. in the third. The dried cossettes, which are suitable for feeding to sheep and cattle, may be ground to potato meal for use in the rations of pigs.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 1939 , pp. 347 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Kellner, O. (1926). The Scientific Feeding of Animals (2nd English edition).Google Scholar
Procter, F. & Wright, N. C. (1927). J. agric. Sci. 17, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, T. B. & Woodman, H. E. (1924). J. agric. Sci. 14, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, T. B. & Woodman, H. E. (1936). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., No. 48.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1925). J. agric. Sci. 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Duckham, A. N. & French, M. H. (1929 a). J. agric. Sci. 19, 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Duckham, A. N. & French, M. H. (1929 b). J. agric. Sci. 19, 656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1932). J. agric. Sci. 22, 670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Evans, R. E. & Menzies Kitchin, A. W. (1932). J. agric. Sci. 22, 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Menzies Kitchin, A. W. & Evans, R. E. (1931). J. agric. Sci. 21, 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. C., Davidson, W. M., Watson, C. J., Robinson, C. H. & Muir, G. W. (1938). Sci. Agric. 18, 629.Google Scholar