Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T20:25:22.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Causes of inter-varietal differences in susceptibility to sodium toxicity injury in Phaseolus vulgaris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Ali T. Ayoub
Ali T. Ayoub
Affiliation:
Hudeiba Research Station, P.O. Box 31, Ed-Damer, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Varieties of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were grown under both greenhouse and field conditions to determine the causes of inter-varietal differences in susceptibility to sodium toxicity injury. Varieties varied greatly in plant growth and survival on sodic soils under arid conditions. Environmental conditions were very important in determining differences in survival. Chemical analysis of plant parts indicated that varieties accumulated different amounts of sodium in the roots, stems and leaves. Sodium concentration in stems and leaves of sodium-tolerant varieties was controlled to a low level at lower degrees of injury.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , December 1974 , pp. 539 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, G. H. & Mackenzie, A. J. (1964). Salt tolerance of soybean varieties (Glycine max L. Merrell) during germination and later growth. Crop Science 4, 157–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Ali T. (1974). Effect of calcium on sodium snlinization of beans (Phaseoltw vulgaris L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 25 (85).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Ali T. & Ishag, H. M. (1974). Sodium toxicity and cation imbalance in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, L. (1964). Salinity and roses. American Rose Annual. Riverside, California.Google Scholar
Brouweb, R. (1963). The influence of the suction tension of the nutrient solutions on growth, transpiration and diffusion pressure deficit of bean leaves (Phaseolus vulgaris). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 12, 248–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H. D. & Pratt, P. F. (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. University of California, Division of Agricultural Science.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. (1961). The essential role of calcium in selective cation transport of plant cells. Plant Physiology 36, 437–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishag, H. M. & Ayoub, Ali T. (1974). Effect of sowing date and soil type on yield, yield components and survival of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 343–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Haye, P. A. & Epstein, E. (1969). Salt toleration by plants; enhancement with calcium. Science 166, 395–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengel, K. (1973). Mineral nutrition and salinity tolerance as factors in crop production. First FAO/SIDA Seminar for Plant Scientists from Africa and Near East, Cairo, Egypt, 1–20 09 1973.Google Scholar
Nieman, R. H. (1965). Expansion of bean leaves and its suppression by salinity. Plant Physiology 40, 156–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, G. A. (1967). Absorption and translocation of sodium in beans and cotton. Plant Physiology 42, 1171–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richard, C. D. (ed.) (1967). Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Part II. Plant Analysis, pp. 80–81. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication series.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. (1968). Effect of temperature and pH on sodium translocation and sodium exchange reactions in bush bean. Soil Science 106, 144–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, A. (1971). Low temperature, calcium, and nitrate ion interactions on nonexchangeablo rubidium, cesium, and sodium absorption by bush beans. Plant and Soil 34, 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar