Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T23:06:50.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calculation of confidence limits of monthly rainfall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. L. Manning
H. L. Manning
Affiliation:
Cotton Research Station, Namulonge, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Glover & Robinson (1953) have recently criticized the use of a transformation in calculating confidence limits of monthly rainfall, and have suggested that the technique is complicated and even misleading. They contend that the use of unadjusted monthly data leads to no serious discrepancies. If this were in fact so, there is no doubt that much time and effort could be saved. It is therefore desirable to compare the two techniques, and to set out against the recorded data the predictions obtained from them.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 1956 , pp. 154 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Glover, J. & Robinson, P. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, H. L. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 169–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SirKeen, Bernard (1954). Letter to The Times, 18 01 1954.Google Scholar