Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T16:15:35.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The breeding history of Picton oats and observations on the behaviour of certain oat crosses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. Hunter  and
G. P. Carson
H. Hunter
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
G. P. Carson
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A general account of investigations carried out at the Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, on winter oats was published by Hunter (1935). In it brief mention is made of the origin of a series of oats designated the ‘ex 109/1 series’. It is the purpose of this article to give a more detailed account of the origin and behaviour of this series, from which the winter variety Picton was selected, and to detail a further number of anomalous features which have arisen in the course of breeding work at Cambridge.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 1949 , pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Coffman, F. A. (1937). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 29, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, T. (1937). J. Helminthology, 15, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, T. (1948). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Howard, H. W. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, H. W. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, H. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. E. (1939). Phytopathology, 29, 827Google Scholar