Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T05:35:12.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yields of, and N uptakes by, some grass species and varieties under different glasshouse conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. D. D. Mitchell
J. D. D. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The amount of dry matter produced and N taken up by seven grass species and varieties grown in a glasshouse were compared with perennial ryegrass (S. 23) and Italian ryegrass (S. 22) at different day-lengths and light intensities.

The ryegrasses Westerwolds, Italian (S. 22) and Perennial (S. 321) yielded more than S. 23. At the smallest light intensities, Westerwolds, Italian (S. 22) and Perennial (S. 24) (S. 321) ryegrasses and Meadow fescue (S. 215) took up more N than S. 23. Westerwolds and Perennial (S. 24) (S. 321) ryegrasses should be useful alternatives to the S. 23 or S. 22 strains as test crops in nutrient experiments in the glasshouse, especially when grown in the dim light during winter.

Type
Short Note
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1970 , pp. 361 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, D. J. A. & Dent, J. W. (1967). The relationship between yield and digestibility in the primary growth of nine grass varieties. J. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. 11, 104–13.Google Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1961). Soil nitrogen. VI. Correlations between laboratory measurements of soil mineral–N and crop yields and responses in pot and field experiments. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 562–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. O. (1964). Evaluation of species and varieties of herbage plants. Exps. Prog. Grassld Res. Inst., 17, Rep. for 1963–64, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
Maccoll, D. & Cooper, J. P. (1967). Climatic variation in forage grasses. III. Seasonal changes in growth and assimilation in climatic races of Lolium, Dactylis and Festuca. J. appl. Ecol. 4, 113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowakowski, T. Z. & Cunningham, R. K. (1966). Nitrogen fractions and soluble carbohydrates in Italian ryegrass. II. Effects of light intensity, form and level of nitrogen. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 17, 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vose, P. B. (1963). The cation content of Perennial ryegrass Lolium perenne L. in relation to intraspecific variability and nitrogen/potassium interaction. PL. Soil. 19, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Williams, R. J. B. (1963). An experiment comparing responses to nitrogen fertiliser of four grass species. Expl. Husb. 9, 28–36.Google Scholar