Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T18:37:20.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical composition and bioactive compounds of Riceberry rice produced under organic and conventional practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2022

J. Kunnam ,
P. Teamkao  and
C. Aninbon Open the ORCID record for C. Aninbon [Opens in a new window]
J. Kunnam
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
P. Teamkao
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
C. Aninbon*
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
*
Author for correspondence: C. Aninbon, E-mail: chorkaew.an@kmitl.ac.th
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is often stated that organic rice has a higher content of healthy phytochemicals than ordinary rice, and the facts on this claim obtained experimentally are rare. Riceberry is a new rice variety in Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of organic practice and conventional practice on the content of chemical composition and bioactive compounds in Riceberry rice. The results showed that agricultural practices were not significantly different for grain yield in the first year, but they were different in the second year. Rice produced by organic practice had a higher content of iron, gamma-aminobutyric acid, total phenolic and anthocyanin (4.15, 1.67, 41.3 and 20.1 mg/100 g dry weight in the first year, and 4.06, 3.37, 89.7 and 14.7 mg/100 g dry weight in the second year) than that produced by conventional practice (2.25, 1.11, 38.8 and 6.89 mg/100 g dry in the first year, and 1.96, 2.77, 54.1 and 5.71 mg/100 g dry in the second year). Rice produced by organic practice also had lower sugar content (2.92 g/100 g dry weight in the first year, and 1.99 g/100 g dry weight in the second year) than that produced by conventional practice (3.46 g/100 g dry weight in the first year, and 2.81 g/100 g dry weight in the second year). Gamma oryzanol and antioxidant capacity were also lower in organic rice compared to conventional rice. This study indicated that organic Riceberry rice had a higher quality compared to non-organic rice.

Keywords

Anthocyanincerealfertilizermineralspolyphenols
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 161 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 13 - 21
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aninbon, C, Jogloy, S, Vorasoot, N, Nuchadomrong, S, Senawong, CT, Holbrook, C and Patanothai, A (2016) Effect of mid season drought on phenolic compounds in peanut genotypes with different levels of resistance to drought. Field Crops Research 187, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC (2016) AOAC Official Method 984.27 Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, and Zinc in Infant Formula Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopic Method. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis. 20th ed. AOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
AOAC (2019) AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Edition. AOAC International. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Asami, DK, Hong, Y, Barrett, DM and Mitchell, AE (2003) Comparison of the total phenolic and ascorbic acid content of freeze-dried and air-dried marionberry, strawberry, and corn grown using conventional, organic, and sustainable agricultural practices. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 51, 1237–1241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assefa, S and Tadesse, S (2019) The principal role of organic fertilizer on soil properties and agricultural productivity – a review. Agricultural Research and Technology 22, 46–50.Google Scholar
Bagchi, TB, Ghosh, A, Kumar, U, Chattopadhyay, K, Sanghamitra, P, Ray, S and Sharma, S (2016) Comparison of nutritional and physicochemical quality of rice under organic and standard production systems. Cereal Chemistry 93, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, AW and Shelp, BJ (2016) Plant GABA: not just a metabolite. Trends in Plant Science 21, 811–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, ET, Wood, DF, Juliano, BO and Bechtel, DB (2004) The rice grain and its gross composition. In Juliano, B (ed.), Rice Chemistry and Technology. St. Paul, USA: American Association of Cereal Chemists, pp. 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomchat, W and Rungrat, T (2020) Effects of flash flood on growth and some physiological changes in Thai rice at tillering stage. Naresuan Agriculture Journal 17, 68–76.Google Scholar
De Silva, GO, Abeysundara, AT and Aponso, MMW (2017) Extraction methods, qualitative and quantitative techniques for screening of phytochemicals from plants. American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products 5, 29–32.Google Scholar
Gomez, KA and Gomez, AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, MH, Jaafar, HZE, Rahmat, A and Rahman, ZA (2011) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites in three varieties of kacip fatimah (Labisia pumila blume). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12, 5238–5254.Google ScholarPubMed
Jirapa, K, Jarae, Y, Phanee, R and Jirasak, K (2016) Changes of bioactive components in germinated paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Food Research Journal 23, 229–236.Google Scholar
Jung, T, Shin, G, Kim, J, Choi, S, Lee, J, Lee, SJ, Park, SJ, Woo, KS, Oh, SK and Lee, O (2017) Comparative analysis of oryzanol, glucan, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity in fermented rice bran of different varieties. Nutrients 9, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakar, K, Xuan, TD, Noori, Z, Aryan, S and Gulab, G (2020) Effects of organic and non-organic fertilizer application on growth, yield, and grain quality of rice. Agriculture 10, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, M, Asthir, B and Mahajan, G (2017) Variation in antioxidants, bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity in germinated and ungerminated grains of ten rice cultivars. Rice Science 24, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, GA, Cho, JY, Lee, YS, Lee, HJ, Jeong, HY, Lee, YG and Moon, JH (2017) Comparison of the content of bioactive substances and antioxidative activity between conventionally and organically cultivated brown rice (Oryza sativa L.). Korean Journal of Food Preservation 24, 334–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konopka, I, Tańska, M, Faron, A, Stępień, A and Wojtkowiak, K (2012) Comparison of the phenolic compounds, carotenoids and tocochromanols content in wheat grain under organic and mineral fertilization regimes. Molecules 17, 12341–12356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kováčik, J, Klejdus, B, Bačkor, M and Repčák, M (2007) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity and phenolic compounds accumulation in nitrogen-deficient Matricaria chamomilla leaf rosettes. Plant Science 172, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y, Pao, C, Wu, S and Chang, C (2015) Effect of different germination conditions on antioxidative properties and bioactive compounds of germinated brown rice. BioMed Research International 2015, 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Mariem, SB, González-Torralba, J, Collar, C, Aranjuelo, I and Morales, F (2020) Durum wheat grain yield and quality under low and high nitrogen conditions: insights into natural variation in low- and high-yielding genotypes. Plants 9, 1–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Medda, S, Fadda, A, Dessena, L and Mulas, M (2021) Quantification of total phenols, tannins, anthocyanins content in Myrtus communis L. and antioxidant activity evaluation in function of plant development stages and altitude of origin site. Agronomy 11, 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moongngarm, A, Daomukda, N and Khumpika, S (2012) Chemical compositions, phytochemicals, and antioxidant capacity of rice bran, rice bran layer, and rice germ. Agricultural Practice CBEE Procedia 2, 73–79.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S, Ohmura, R, Toshima, S, Park, H, Narasako, Y, Hirano, T, Otani, M and Kunitake, H (2021) Changes in polyphenols, anthocyanins, and DPPH radical-scavenging activities in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) during tuber growth. Scientia Horticulturae 284, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poosri, S, Thilavech, T, Pasukamonset, P, Suparpprom, C and Adisakwattana, S (2019) Studies on Riceberry rice (Oryza sativa L.) extract on the key steps related to carbohydrate and lipid digestion and absorption: a new source of natural bioactive substances. NFS Journal 17, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pramai, P, Thongsook, T, Thanasukarn, P, Jannoey, P, Nuengchamnong, N, Chen, F, Maulidiani, M, Abas, F and Jiamyangyuen, S (2019) Chemical profiles of three varieties of germinated rice based on LC-MS and their antioxidant activity. Food and Applied Bioscience Journal 7, 11–32.Google Scholar
Settapramote, N, Laokuldilok, T, Boonyawan, D and Utama-ang, N (2018) Physiochemical, antioxidant activities and anthocyanin of Riceberry rice from different locations in Thailand. Food and Applied Bioscience Journal 6, 84–94.Google Scholar
Sharma, A, Shahzad, B, Rehman, A, Bhardwaj, R, Landi, M and Zheng, B (2019) Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules 24, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soil Resources Survey and Research Division (2017) Eastern and Southern soil series; Agriculture Fundamentals. Available at http://oss101.ldd.go.th/soilr/SoilGrp25k48_53/pdf/E_Sseries_2557.pdf.Google Scholar
Vamanu, E and Nita, S (2013) Antioxidant capacity and the correlation with major phenolic compounds, anthocyanin, and tocopherol content in various extracts from the wild edible Boletus edulis mushroom. BioMed Research International 2013, 1–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Wiset, L (2012) Factors affecting the cooking qualities of rice. Burapha Science Journal 17, 172–180.Google Scholar
Yang, Y, Zhu, K, Xia, H, Chen, L and Chen, K (2014) Comparative proteomic analysis of indica and japonica rice varieties. Genetics and Molecular Biology 37, 652–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuchowski, J, Jonczyk, K, Pecio, L and Oleszek, W (2011) Phenolic acid concentrations in organically and conventionally cultivated spring and winter wheat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 1089–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed