Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-6fdxz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T20:44:16.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ammonification and nitrification in soil of urea with and without biuret

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. J. Low  and
F. J. Piper
A. J. Low
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Agricultural Division, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks.
F. J. Piper
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Agricultural Division, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A laboratory investigation was made of the ammonification and nitrification in soil of pure urea with and without pure biuret and pure biuret alone. The soils ranged from acid (pH 5·1) to calcareous (pH 7·9). The work was done at two temperatures 5 and 25°C. The time between adding urea to the soil and the first analysis was from 1 h to 1 week. The soil moisture contents ranged from the wilting percentage to field capacity. In all work involving urea, ammonium sulphate was used as a standard to compare rates of nitrification.

Biuret had no detectable effect on the rates of ammonification and nitrification of urea. Biuret by itself nitrified in all the soils at both temperatures being slowest at 5 °C in the acid soil and fastest in the calcareous at 25°C.

Neither pH nor temperature appreciably affected the ammonification of urea but both had a marked effect on nitrification. The lower the pH and the lower the temperature the slower the nitrification. Ammonium from urea nitrified faster than ammonium sulphate and on the acid soil only ammonium from the urea nitrified.

The moisture content of the soil only affected ammonification of urea slightly but had a marked effect on the nitrification, the drier the soil the slower the nitrification. The same observation applied to ammonium sulphate.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1970 , pp. 301 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, O. E. & Purvis, E. R. (1955). Effects of low temperatures on nitrification of ammonia in soils. Soil Sci. 80, 313–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, F. L. (1936). Selenium as a catalyst in the Kjeldahl method as applied to soil and grass analysis. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 26, 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascomb, C. L. (1964). Rapid method for the determination of cation-exchange capacity of calcareous and non-calcareous soils. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 15, 821–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollard, E. G., Cook, A. R. & Turner, N. A. (1968). Urea as source of nitrogen for plant growth. 1. The development of urease activity in Spirodela oligorrhiza. Planta 83, 1–12.Google Scholar
Bouyoucos, G. J. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agron. J. 43, 434–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. & Shaw, K. (1955). Determination of ammonia and nitrate in soil. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 46, 320–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. H. (1906). Schleibler's apparatus for the determination of carbonic acid in carbonates: an improved construction and use for accurate analysis. J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond. 25, 518–22.Google Scholar
Doak, B. W. (1952). Some chemical changes in the nitrogenous constituents of urine when voided on pastures. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42, 162–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehane, J. J. & Staple, W. J. (1951). Desiccator method for determining permanent wilting percentages of soils. Soil Sci. 72, 429–33.Google Scholar
McLean, W. & Robinson, G. W. (1924). A new method for the determination of ammoniacal nitrogen in soils. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 14, 548–54.Google Scholar
Markham, R. (1942). A steam distillation apparatus suitable for the micro-Kjeldahl analysis. Biochem. J. 36, 790–1.Google Scholar
Ogata, T. & Funabiki, S. (1954). Studies on biuret from agricultural standpoint. II. Stability of biuret in soil. Scient. Mep. Malsuyama agric. Coll. no. 12, 15–22.Google Scholar
Olsen, C. (1929). On the analytical determination of ammonia in soil and the adsorption power of soil for ammonia. C. r. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg 17 (15), 1–20.Google Scholar
Owen, O. & Winsor, G. W. (1950). The nitrogenous status of soils. Part II. The effect of levels of application on the nitrification of some nitrogenous fertilizers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 40, 191–7.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. (1957). The critical relationship between soil moisture content in the region of wilting point and the mineralisation of natural soil nitrogen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49, 100–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. J. (1961). Soil Conditions and Plant Growth, 9th edn. p. 301. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Starostka, R. W. & Clark, K. G. (1955). Urea-biuret mixtures. Agric. Chem. 10, no. 70, 49–50, 103, 105.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. (1947). A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils—effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. 63, 251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar