Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-nfgnx Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-20T08:03:46.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of IMC after a Decade of Development: Who's at the Wheel, and How Can We Measure Success?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2004

WILLIAM N. SWAIN
WILLIAM N. SWAIN
Affiliation:
University of Louisiana at Lafayette swain@louisiana.edu
Get access

Abstract

The literature on integrated marketing communication (IMC) in the decade since its introduction offers evidence that debates over the definition, acceptance, leadership, and measurement of IMC remain unresolved. A survey was conducted to investigate leadership preferences and perceptions of appropriate methods of measurement and agency compensation in planning and implementing IMC. The survey was conducted by internet among samples of six professional groups with ties to marketing communication: advertising agency executives, public relations agency executives, corporate marketing executives, corporate public relations executives, advertising and marketing academics, and public relations academics. The survey revealed some clustering of leadership preferences but little movement toward marketing communication measurement and agency compensation methods consistent with models of IMC as a developing paradigm.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Advertising Research , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 46 - 65
Copyright
© Copyright © 1960-2004, The ARF

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Productivity & Quality Center. Integrated Marketing Communication Consortium Benchmarking Study Best-Practices Report. Houston, TX: American Productivity & Quality Center, 1998.
Cornelissen, J.P., and A.P. Lock. “Theoretical Concept or Management Fashion?: Examining the Significance of IMC.” Journal of Advertising Research 40, 5 (2000): 7–15.Google Scholar
Eppes, T.E. “Rebirth of an Agency: Challenges and Implications of Operating in an IMC Framework.” Journal of Integrated Communications 9 (1998–1999): 28–38.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J., D.B. Lerman, and A.F. Grein. “Agency Perceptions and Practices on Global IMC.” Journal of Advertising Research 39, 1 (1999): 7–20.Google Scholar
Kitchen, P.J., and D.E. Schultz. “A Multi-Country Comparison of the Drive for IMC.” Journal of Advertising Research 39, 1 (1999): 21–38.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R.V. “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing Research 39, 1 (2002): 61–72.Google Scholar
Low, G.S. “Correlates of Integrated Marketing Communications.” Journal of Advertising Research 40, 1 (2000): 27–39.Google Scholar
McArthur, D.N., and T. Griffin. “A Marketing Management View of Integrated Marketing Communications.” Journal of Advertising Research 37, 5 (1997): 19–26.Google Scholar
Nicholson, T. “What Every CEO Wants to Hear from Communications: Objective Measures Essential to More Effective Communications Planning.” Journal of Integrated Communications 12 (2001–2002): 7–10.Google Scholar
Payne, A. “Targeted Technology: Data Analysis in Internet Development and Delivery.” Journal of Integrated Communications (2001–2002).Google Scholar
Pettegrew, L.S. “If IMC is So Good, Why Isn't It Being Implemented?: Barriers to IMC Adoption in Corporate America.” Journal of Integrated Communications 11 (2000–2001): 29–37.Google Scholar
Schultz, D.E., and B.E. Barnes. Strategic Advertising Campaigns, 4th ed. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books, 1995.
Schultz, D.E., and P.J. Kitchen. “Integrated Marketing Communications in U.S. Advertising Agencies: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Advertising Research 37, 5 (1997): 7–18.Google Scholar
Schultz, D.E., and P.J. Kitchen. “A Response to “Theoretical Concept or Management Fashion?” Journal of Advertising Research 40, 5 (2000): 17–21.Google Scholar
Schultz, D.E., S.I. Tannenbaum, and R.F. Lauterborn. Integrated Marketing Communications. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books, 1992.
Sheehan, K.B., and C. Doherty. “Re-Weaving the Web: Integrating Print and Online Communications.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 15, 2 (2001): 47–59.Google Scholar
Spake, D.F., G. D'Souza, T.N. Crutchfield, and R.M. Morgan. “Advertising Agency Compensation: An Agency Theory Explanation.” Journal of Advertising 28, 3 (1999): 53–72.Google Scholar
Standard Directory of Advertisers. New Providence, NJ: National Register Publishing, 2001.
Standard Directory of Advertising Agencies. New Providence, NJ: National Register Publishing, 2001.
Swain, W.N., O. Zatepilina, L. Chmiola, H. Qian, L. Moceri, P. Dev, and L. Dinu. “We Like It, We're Doing It, but Do We Know What It Is (Yet)?: An Exploratory Study of Integrated Marketing Communication.” Web Journal of Mass Communication Research 4, 4 (2001): http://www.scripps.ohiou.edu/wjmcr/vol04/4-4a-b.htm.Google Scholar
Swallie, M., and S. Tuttle. “Integration, Reputation, and Research.” Journal of Integrated Communications 8 (1997–1998): 19–26.Google Scholar