Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-4tbfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-14T15:18:31.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is to be done? The science question in International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

James Bohman
James Bohman*
Affiliation:
Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
*
E-mail: bohmanjf@slu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Meeting Report
Information
International Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2009 , pp. 488 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bohman, J. (1999), ‘Theories, practices, and pluralism: a pragmatic interpretation of critical social science’, in Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 12, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, pp. 459–480.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1958), ‘Empiricism, semantics and ontology’, in Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics and Modal Logical, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, p. 206.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1948), Reconstruction in Philosophy, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1986), ‘Logic: the theory of inquiry’, in J.A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1938, Vol. 12, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 489–495.Google Scholar
Linklater, A. (2001), ‘The changing contours of critical international relations theory’, in R.W. Jones (ed.), Critical Theory and World Politics, London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
Monteiro, N.P.Ruby, K.G. (2009), ‘IR and the false promise of philosophical foundations’, International Theory 1(1): 15–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1934), Collected Papers, Vol. 5 and 6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 252–258.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1969), ‘Epistemology naturalized’, in Ontological Relativity and other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, B. (1993), Grasping the Democratic Peace, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 20.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1986), Poverty and Famine, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–166.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Vol. 1. New York: Knopf, p. 84.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1990), Coercion, Capital and European States, London: Blackwell.Google Scholar