Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-bslzr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-03-15T01:21:12.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Jon C. Pevehouse
Get access

Abstract

Scholars and policymakers alike have recently begun to tout the ability of international organizations (IOs) to encourage and secure democracy throughout the world. Despite this stance, little theoretical attention or empirical investigation has attempted to ascertain why or whether this relationship truly exists. One challenge to answering this puzzle is that extant theories of international institutions do not generally delineate clear hypotheses about how IOs influence domestic politics. In this article, I address this paucity of both theory and empirical evidence. I delineate three causal mechanisms that link IOs to domestic actors' calculations about political liberalization and test the argument. I find that membership in regional IOs is correlated with transitions to democracy during the period from 1950 to 1992.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , Summer 2002 , pp. 515 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A. 1989. The International-National Connection. British Journal of Political Science 19 (2):237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmus, Ronald D., Kugler, Richard L., and Larrabee, F. Stephen. 1993. Building a New NATO. Foreign Affairs 72 (4):28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 1994. Cross-polity Data Codebook. Unpublished manuscript, Binghamton University, Binghamton, N.Y.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. Various years. Political Handbook of the World. Binghamton, N.Y.: CSA Publications.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur S., and Mueller, Thomas C.. 1998. Political Handbook of the World. Binghamton, N.Y.: CSA Publications.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Richard J. 1994. Making the Western Hemisphere Safe for Democracy? The OAS Defense-of-Democracy Regime. Washington Quarterly 17 (2):157–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Aurel. 1999. Introduction: The Continuing Dilemmas of Transition. In Dilemmas of Transition: The Hungarian Experience, edited by Braun, Aurel and Barany, Zoltan, 1–28. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Burkhart, Ross, and Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1994. Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis. American Political Science Review 88 (4):903–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A. 1994. Democracy and Authoritarianism in Peru: Political Coalitions and Social Change. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A. 1998. Self-Coups: Peru, Guatemala, and Russia. Journal of Democracy 9 (1):125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopher, Warren. 1995. America's Leadership, America–s Opportunity. Foreign Policy 98:6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIA World Factbook. 1999. Available from ⟨www.odci.gov⟩. Accessed 30 October 1999.Google Scholar
Van, Coufoudakis. 1977. The European Economic Community and the ‘Freezing’ of the Greek Association, 1967–1974. Journal of Common Market Studies 16 (2):114–31.Google Scholar
Dassel, Kurt, and Reinhardt, Eric. 1999. Domestic Strife and the Initiation of Violence at Home and Abroad. American Journal of Political Science 43 (1):56–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Paul W. 1998. The International Causes of Democratization, 1974–1990. In The Origins of Liberty: Political and Economic Liberalization in the Modern World, edited by Drake, Paul W. and McCubbins, Mathew D., 70–91. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farer, Tom. 1996. Collectively Defending Democracy in the Western Hemisphere: Introduction and Overview. In Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas, edited by Farer, Tom, 1–25. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of Interstate Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 1996. Explaining Interethnic Cooperation. American Political Science Review 90 (4):715–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Yi, and Zak, Paul J.. 1999. The Determinants of Democratic Transitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (2):162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Raquel, and Portes, Jonathan. 1998. Returns to Regionalism: An Evaluation of Nontraditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements. The World Bank Economic Review 12 (2):197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996a. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996b. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization 50 (2):325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark J. 1995. Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis. American Political Science Review 89 (4):882–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark J. 1996. An Overview of the Political Regime Change Dataset. Comparative Political Studies 29 (4):469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt T. 1996. Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization 50 (1):109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know About Democratization after Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1996. International Law and Domestic Institutions: Reconciling North American “Unfair” Trade Laws. International Organization 50 (4):541–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1998. International Institutions and Domestic Politics: GATT, WTO, and the Liberalization of International Trade. In The WTO as an International Organization, edited by Krueger, Anne O., 133–60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter A. 1978. The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics. International Organization 32 (4):881–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, Joseph. 1996. State Interests and Institutional Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union. Security Studies 5 (3):261–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephen, and Kaufman, Robert. 1992. Economic Adjustment and the Prospects for Democracy. In The Politics of Economic Adjustment, edited by Haggard, Stephen and Kaufman, Robert, 319–350. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephen, and Kaufman, Robert. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton, and Lomasney, Kristen. 1998. Guaranteeing Democracy: A Review of the Record. Journal of Democracy 9 (2):134–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Okla.: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 1996. The International Dimensions of Democratization in Latin America: The Case of Brazil. In The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas, edited by Whitehead, Laurence, 146–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, and Kupchan, Charles. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44 (3):283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Daniel, Bremer, Stuart, and Singer, J. David. 1996. Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2):163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1992. External Influence, Conditionality, and the Politics of Adjustment. In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Politics, and the State, edited by Haggard, Stephen and Kaufman, Robert, 89–136. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaosmanoglu, Ali L. 1991. The International Context of Democratic Transition in Turkey. In Encouraging Democracy: The International Context of Regime Transition in Southern Europe, edited by Pridham, Geoffrey, 159–74. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert. 1986. Liberalization and Democratization in South America: Perspectives from the 1970s. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence, 85–107. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Knack, Stephen. 1995. Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics and Politics 7 (3):207–27.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Hoffman, Stanley. 1993. Conclusion: Structure, Strategy, and International Roles. In After the Cold War: State Strategies and International Institutions in Europe 1989–1991, edited by Keohane, Robert, Nye, Joseph, and Hoffman, Stanley, 381–406. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Martin, Lisa L.. 1995. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security 20 (1):39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurth, James. 1979. The Political Consequences of the Product Cycle: Industrial History and Political Outcomes. International Organization 33 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley. 1999. Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4):979–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. Some Social Requisites for Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (1):69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londregan, John B., and Poole, Keith T.. 1990. Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power. World Politics 42 (2):151–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londregan, John B. 1996. Does High Income Promote Democracy? World Politics 49 (1):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1992. Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues. In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, edited by Mainwaring, Scott, O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Valenzuela, Arturo, 294–341. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Malloy, James M. 1987. The Politics of Transition in Latin America. In Authoritarians and Democrats: Regime Transition in Latin America, edited by Malloy, James and Seligson, Mitchell, 235–58. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. 1998. The Proliferation of Preferential Trading Arrangements. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (5):523–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3):477–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuel, Paul C. 1996. The Challenges of Democratic Consolidation in Portugal. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary. 1992. Rational Sources of Chaos in Democratic Transition. In Reexamining Democracy: Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset, edited by Marks, Gary and Diamond, Larry, 47–69. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty. 1999. Polity 98 Dataset. Available from ⟨www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/polity⟩. Accessed 1 July 1999.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., and Simmons, Beth A.. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, James. 1980. Intergovernmental Organizations and Cooperation Among Nations. International Studies Quarterly 24 (1):75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, Connie. 1995. Constructing the Nation-State: International Organization and Prescriptive Action. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1998. Regional Economic Co-operation, Global Markets, and Domestic Politics. In Regionalism and Global Economic Integration, edited by Coleman, William and Underhill, Geoffrey, 19–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R. 1995. International Historical Statistics: Africa, Asia and Oceania 1750–1988. New York: Stockton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R. 1998. International Historical Statistics: The Americas 1750–1993. London: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Taberes, Tressa E.. 1998. The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990. American Political Science Review 92 (3):649–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr., 1987. Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Reprint. Latham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1979. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert, ed. 1989. Democracy in the Americas: Stopping the Pendulum. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Payne, Leigh. 1994. Brazilian Industrialists and Democratic Change. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2000. Democracy from Above? Regional Organizations and Democratization. Ph. D. diss., Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002. With a Little Help from My Friends? Regional Organizations and the Consolidation of Democracy. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3):611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polachek, Solomon W. 1996. Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less: The Relationship between International Trade and Cooperation. Review of International Economics 5 (3):295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Charles. 1996. International Aspects of Democratization: The Case of Spain. In The International Dimensions of Democratization, edited by Whitehead, Laurence, 285–314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1991a. Encouraging Democracy: The International Context of Regime Transition in Southern Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1991b. The Politics of the European Community, Transnational Networks and Democratic Transition in Southern Europe. In Encouraging Democracy: The International Context of Regime Transition in Southern Europe, edited by Pridham, Geoffrey, 212–45. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1994. The International Dimension of Democratization: Theory, Practice, and Inter-regional Comparisons. In Building Democracy? The International Dimension of Democratization in Eastern Europe, edited by Pridham, Geoffrey, Herring, Eric, and Sanford, George, 7–31. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1995. The International Context of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. In The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective, edited by Gunther, Richard, Diamandouros, P., and Puhle, Hans-Jurgen, 166–203. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey, Herring, Eric, and Sanford, George, eds. 1994. Building Democracy? The International Dimension of Democratization in Eastern Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1986. Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence, 47–63. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 1996. What Makes Democracies Endure? Journal of Democracy 7 (1):39–55.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. Modernization: Theories and Facts. World Politics 49 (2):155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 2001. Does Peace Nature Democracy? Journal of Politics 63 (3):935–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathyrn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1998. A Neo-Kantian Perspective: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations in Building Security Communities. In Security Communities, edited by Adler, Emmanuel and Barnett, Michael, 368–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce, Oneal, John, and Davis, David R.. 1998. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–1985. International Organization 52 (3):441–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillipe. 1986. An Introduction to Southern European Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Southern Europe, edited by O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence, 3–10. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1998. Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises. American Political Science Review 92 (4):829–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1999. Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War. International Organization 53 (2):233–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, Cheryl, Jacobson, Harold K., and Kaplan, Jeffrey H.. 1996. Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992. International Organization 50 (4):593–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheahan, John. 1986. Economic Policies and the Prospects for Successful Transition from Authoritarian Rule in Latin America. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence, 154–64. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Michael W., and Gartzke, Erik. 1996. Political System Similarity and the Choice of Allies: Do Democracies Flock Together, or Do Opposites Attract? Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (4):617–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Melvin, and Singer, J. David. 1994. Correlates of War Project: International and Civil War Data, 1816–1992. Study no. 9905. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1998. International Crises and Domestic Politics. American Political Science Review 92 (3):623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Tony. 1994. America's Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Order at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, David, and Chang, Patricia Mei Yin. 1993. The International Labor Organization and the Welfare State: Institutional Effects on National Welfare Spending, 1960–1980. International Organization 47 (2):235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, Robert, Heston, Alan, Nuxoll, Daniel A., and Aten, Bettina. 1995. The Penn World Table (Mark 5.6a). Available from pwt.econ.upenn.edu. Accessed 1 December 2000.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. 1996. Democracy and Peace: Putting the Cart Before the Horse? International Organization 50 (1):141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tovias, Alfred. 1984. The International Context of Democratic Transition. In The New Mediterranean Democracies: Regime Transition in Spain, Greece, and Portugal, edited by Pridham, Geoffrey, 158–71. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Treverton, Gregory. 1986. Spain: Domestic Politics and Security Policy. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Vetschera, Heinz. 1997. Security Policy and Democratic Control. In Civil-Military Relations in Post-Communist States, edited by Bebler, Anton, 15–21. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Verney, Susannah, and Couloumbis, Theodore. 1991. State-International System Interaction and the Greek Transition to Democracy in the Mid-1970s. In Encouraging Democracy: The International Context of Regime Transition in Southern Europe, edited by Pridham, Geoffrey, 103–24. New York: St. Martin–s Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1986. International Aspects of Democratization. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by O–Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence, 3–46. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1989. The Consolidation of Fragile Democracies: A Discussion with Illustrations. In Democracy in the Americas: Stopping the Pendulum, edited by Pastor, Robert, 76–95. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1993. Requisites for Admission. In The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas, edited by Smith, Peter, 149–82. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1996a. The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1996b. Democratic Regions, Ostracism, and Pariahs. In The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas, edited by Whitehead, Laurence, 395–412. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1996c. Concerning International Support for Democracy in the South. In Democratization in the South: The Jagged Wave, edited by Luckham, Robin and White, Gordon, 243–73. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1996d. Democracy by Convergence and Southern Europe: A Comparative Politics Perspective. In The International Aspects of Democratization: Europe and the Americas, edited by Whitehead, Laurence, 265–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1998. The World Development Indicators. CD-ROM. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar