Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-9t7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T08:08:21.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clashes in the Assembly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Erik Voeten
Get access

Abstract

I apply nominate scaling to analyze a database of Cold War and post–Cold War roll call votes in the United Nations General Assembly. I investigate the dimensionality and stability of global conflict as well as the substantive content of the voting alignments that have replaced the Cold War East-West dimension. I find that post–Cold War conflict in the UN General Assembly is mostly one-dimensional. This single dimension positions countries on a continuum that runs from a group of Western countries at one extreme to a “counterhegemonic” bloc of countries that frequently clashes with the West, and the United States in particular. Levels of democracy and wealth are important independent determinants of the voting behavior of states. The positions of countries along the single dimension are remarkably stable across time, issue area, and issue importance. Except for the Eastern European countries switching sides, they are very similar to the positions on the Cold War East-West dimension. Contrary to expectations, post–Cold War conflict shows little resemblance to Cold War North-South conflict.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , Spring 2000 , pp. 185 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alker, Hayward R. Jr,1964. Dimensions of Conflict in the General Assembly. American Political Science Review 58 (3):642–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr and Russett, Bruce M.. 1965. World Politics in the United Nations General Assembly. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E.. 1996. Debating the Democratic Peace. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces and the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Coombs, Clyde. 1964. A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dixon, William J. 1981. The Emerging Image of U.N. Politics. World Politics 34:47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983a. Stalemate in the North-South Debate: Strategies and the New International Economic Order. World Politics 35 (3):426–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983b. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):205–35 (part 1), (4):323–53 (part 2).Google Scholar
Enelow, James M., and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, Joe D. 1989. Domestic Political Regime Changes and Third World Voting Realignments in the United Nations 1946–1984. International Organization 43 (3):505–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James N., and Snyder, James M. Jr, 1995. A Linear Latent Factor Model of Roll-Call Voting. Mimeograph. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Holloway, Steven. 1990. Forty Years of United Nations General Assembly Voting. Canadian Journal of Political Science 23:279–96.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1999. The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs 78 (2):35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iida, Keisuke. 1988. Third World Solidarity: The Group of 77 in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization 42 (2):375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, and Doyle, Michael W.. 1997. Conclusion: Continuity and Innovation in International Relations Theory. In New Thinking in International Relations Theory, edited by Doyle, Michael W. and Ikenberry, G. John, 266–80. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 1991. Data Theory and Dimensional Analysis. In Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, vol. 78. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 1995. Tracing Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data. Journal of Peace Research 32 (4):469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. Conclusion: National Security in a Changing World. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 498–537. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Soo Yeon, and Russett, Bruce. 1996. The New Politics of Voting Alignments in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization 50 (4):629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1963. The Analysis of Bloc Voting in the General Assembly: A Critique and a Proposal. American Political Science Review 57 (4):902–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 1997. Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War. International Security 21 (4):49–88.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan M., Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Income Redistribution and the Realignment of American Politics. Washington, D.C.: The American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Bruce E. 1985. Consensus or Compliance? Foreign Policy Change and External Dependence. International Organization 39 (2):297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrisson, Richard J. 1972. A Statistical Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2 (2):235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1967. Some Comments on Russett's “Discovering Voting Groups in the United Nations.” American Political Science Review 61 (1):146–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, Hanna, Ross, Michael, and Newcombe, Alan G.. 1970. United Nations Voting Patterns. International Organization 24 (1): 100–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. Patterns of Congressional Voting. American Journal of Political Science 35 (1):228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1966. Discovering Voting Groups in the United Nations. American Political Science Review 60 (2):327–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheetz, Mark S., and Mastanduno, Michael. 1998. Debating the Unipolar Moment. International Security 22 (3): 168–74 (correspondence).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1995. Myths, Modernization, and the Post-Gorbachev World. In International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War, edited by Lebow, Richard Ned and Risse-Kappen, Thomas, 109–26. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Staden, A. van, and Stokman, Franz N.. 1970. Niet-Gebonden Landen en Oost-West Tegenstellingen; een Poging tot Positiebepaling (Non-Aligned Countries and East-West Confrontations; an Attempt to Determine Positions; in Dutch, with English summary). Acta Politico 5:133–64.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 1999. Roll Call Voting in the United Nations General Assembly. Unpublished paper, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1993. The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security 18 (2):44–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, T. Y. 1999. US Foreign Aid and UN Voting: An Analysis of Important Issues. International Studies Quarterly 43(1): 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1997. World Development Indicators (CD-ROM). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar