No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Employment — State B employing driver at its embassy in Oslo — Claim for unfair dismissal — Civil Procedure Act — Whether State B enjoying State immunity in cases between embassy and private individual concerning working conditions — Absolute immunity — Doctrine of restrictive immunity — Distinction between acta jure imperii and acta jure gestionis — Whether activities of diplomatic mission in exercise of governmental authority — Rules of general international law on State immunity — Whether Norwegian courts having jurisdiction
Diplomatic relations — Diplomatic immunity — Employment contract — Dispute between embassy and private individual — Whether dispute could come before courts of State where embassy located — Foreign Service Act — Principles of general international law on State immunity — Embassy staff members — Whether position held relevant — Whether activities of embassy governmental acts — Whether Norwegian courts having jurisdiction
Relationship of international law and municipal law — State immunity — International rules — Regulation of contracts of employment between embassy and locally employed staff — Absolute immunity — Doctrine of restrictive immunity — Distinction between acta jure imperii and acta jure gestionis — Civil Procedure Act — Foreign Service Act — Whether activities of diplomatic mission in exercise of governmental authority — Whether Norwegian courts having jurisdiction — The law of Norway