Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-qr8hc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-29T21:02:56.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Model for Quality Assessment in Heart Transplantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

A. Larsson ,
Anders Möller ,
Ingela Karlsson ,
Marie Stolz-löfgren ,
Gösta Pettersson ,
Eva Berglin William-Olsson  and
Peter A. Shapiro
A. Larsson
Affiliation:
Gothenburg Faculty of Caring Sciences
Anders Möller
Affiliation:
Gothenburg Faculty of Caring Sciences
Ingela Karlsson
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Marie Stolz-löfgren
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Gösta Pettersson
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Eva Berglin William-Olsson
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Peter A. Shapiro
Affiliation:
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model for quality assessment of heart transplantation that combines a scientific method for studying the recipients' quality of life and a basis for a method of clinical work by nurses and other health care professionals is discussed. Besides its use as a research method, this model also may serve as an instrument for documenting patients' biopsychosocial status, including coping capacity, and for evaluating nursing interventions.

Information

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Spring 1994 , pp. 305 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Antonovsky, A.Unravelling the mystery of health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.Google Scholar
2.Bahnson, C. B. The impact of life-threatening illness on the family and the impact of the family on illness: An overview. In Leahey, M. & Wright, L. M. (eds.), Families and life-threatening illness. Springhouse: Springhouse Corporation, 1987, 26–44.Google Scholar
3.Blumenthal, J., Burg, M., Barefoot, J., et al. Social support, type A behaviour, and coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1987,49,318–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Bulechek, G. M., & McCloskey, J. C. (eds.). Nursing interventions: Essential nursing treatments, 2nd ed.Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1992.Google Scholar
5.Burg, M., Blumenthal, J., Barefoot, J., et al. Social support as a buffer against the development of coronary artery disease. Paper presented at the Society of Behavioral Medicine Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1986.Google Scholar
6.Cabrol, C., Gandjbakhch, I., Pavie, A., et al. Long-term results: Morbidity and mortality of patients after heart transplantation. In Walter, P. J. (ed.), Quality of life after open heart surgery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992, 389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cantril, H.Patterns of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
8.Chambers, L. The McMaster health index questionnaire. In Wenger, N., Mattson, M., & Furaberg, C. (eds.), Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York, NY: LeJacq, 1984.Google Scholar
9.Christopherson, L.Cardiac transplantation: A psychological perspective. Circulation, 1987, 75, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Christopherson, L., Gripp, R., & Stinson, E.Rehabilitation after cardiac transplantation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1976, 236, 2082–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysisfor the behavior sciences, 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NY: Laurence Erlbaum, 1983.Google Scholar
12.Evans, R., Manninen, D., Overcast, T., et al. The national heart transplantation study: Final report. Seattle, WA: Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers, 1984.Google Scholar
13.Gamberg, P., & Walton, K.Heart transplant. In Sigardson-poor, K. M. & Haggerty, L. M. (eds.), Nursing care of the transplant recipient. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1990, 180–204.Google Scholar
14.Glaser, G., & Strauss, A.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1967.Google Scholar
15.Lough, M., Lindsey, A., Shinn, J., & Stotts, N.Life satisfaction following heart transplantation. Heart Transplantation, 1985, 4, 446–49.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Lynch, J.The language of the heart. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1985.Google Scholar
17.Mayo, R., Foster, A., & Williamson, B.The psychological and social effects of myocardial infarction in wives. British Medical Journal, 1978, 1, 699–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.McAleer, M., Copeland, J., Fuller, J., & Copeland, J.Psychological aspects of heart transplantation. Heart Transplantation, 1985, 4, 232–33.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Medalie, J., & Gouldbourt, U.Angina pectoris among 10,000 men, II: Psychosocial and other risk factors. American Journal of Medicine, 1976, 60, 910–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Mishel, M., & Murdaugh, C.Family adjustment to heart transplantation: redesigning the dream. Nursing Research, 1987, 36, 332–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.O’Brien, V.Psychological and social aspects of heart transplantation. Heart Transplant, 1985, 4, 229–31.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Packa, D.Quality of life of adults after a heart transplant. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 1989, 3, 12–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Schumm, W., Paff-Bergen, L., Hatch, R., et al. Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1986, 48, 381–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Sexton, D., & Munro, B.Impact of a husband's chronic illness (COPD) on the spouse's life. Research in Nursing and Health, 1985, 8, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Shapiro, P.Life after heart transplantation. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1990, 32, 405–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Smilkstein, G.The family APGAR. Journal of Family Practice, 1978, 6, 1231–39.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Suszyncki, L.Psychosocial aspects of heart transplantation. Social Work, 1988, 33, 205–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Wallwork, J. (ed.). Heart and heart-lung transplantation. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1989.Google Scholar
29.Wallwork, J., & Caine, N.A comparison of the quality of life of cardiac transplant patients and coronary artery bypass graft patients before and after surgery. Quality of Life and Cardiovascular Care, 1985, 1, 317–22.Google Scholar