Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-nx7b4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T09:46:52.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurological and Developmental Follow-Up of a Population at Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Ann L. Stewart
Ann L. Stewart
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Neurodevelopmental follow-up has an important role in perinatal management and research. The value of individual studies depends on the quality of the planning, the data collected, and the interpretation of the findings. Interpretation, in particular, has caused many problems; these have usually arisen because of a failure to understand the nature of the data and what they mean. Follow-up studies are labor intensive and, therefore, very expensive. If they are to continue, there must be a full understanding of their strengths and weaknesses by those who plan them, carry them out, and — above all, by those who analyze and interpret them.

Information

Type
Methods in Follow-Up Studies after Neonatal Intensive Care
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Supplement S1 , January 1991 , pp. 128 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Amiel-Tison, C., & Grenier, A.Neurological assessment during the first year of life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
2.Amiel-Tison, C., Dube, R., Garel, M., & Jequier, J. C. Outcome at age five years of full-term infants with transient neurologic abnormalities in the first year of life. In Stern, L., Bard, H., & Friis-hanson, B. (eds.), Intensive care in the newborn. New York: Masson, 1983, 247–58.Google Scholar
3.Archer, L. N. J., Evans, D. H., Paton, J. Y., & Levene, M. I.Controlled hypercapnia and neonatal cerebral artery doppler waveforms. Pediatric Research, 1986, 20, 218–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Archer, L. N. J., Levene, M. I., & Evans, D. H.Cerebral artery Doppler ultrasonography for prediction of outcome after perinatal asphyxia. Lancet, 1986, ii, 1116–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Azzopardi, D., Wyatt, J. S., Cady, E. B., Hamilton, P. A., Delpy, D. T., Hope, P. L., Stewart, A. L., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Prognosis of infants with hypoxic-ischemic brain injury assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Pediatric Research, 1987, 22, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bracken, M. D. (ed.) Perinatal epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
7.Bradford, B. C., Baudin, J., Conway, M. J., Hazell, J. W. P., Stewart, A. L., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Identification of sensory neural hearing loss in very preterm infants by brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1985, 60, 105–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Cooke, R. W. I.Early and late cranial ultrasonographic appearances and outcome in very low birthweight infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1987, 62, 931–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Costello, A. M. deL., Hamilton, P. A., Baudin, J., Townsend, J., Bradford, B. C., Stewart, A. L., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Prediction of neurodevelopmental impairment at 4 years from brain ultrasound appearance in very preterm infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1988, 30, 711–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Costello, A. M. deL., Hamilton, P. A., & Stewart, A. L. Ultrasound brain scans in very preterm infants: Comparison of outcome at 12–18 months and 4 years. Submitted.Google Scholar
11.Hamilton, P. A., Costello, A. M. deL., Stewart, A. L., Baudin, J., Bradford, B. C., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Ultrasound brain scans in very preterm infants and outcome at 18 months and 4 years of age. Pediatric Research, 1986, 20, 1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hope, P. L., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Investigation of cerebral energy metabolism in newborn infants by phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clinics in Perinatology, 1985, 12, 261–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Hope, P. L., Gould, S. J., Howard, S., Hamilton, P. A., Costello, A. M. deL., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Precision of ultrasound diagnosis of pathologically verified lesions in the brains of very preterm infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1988, 30, 457–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Klein, N., Hack, M., Gallagher, J., & Fanaroff, A. A.Preschool performance of children with normal intelligence who were very low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics, 1985, 75, 531–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Murray, R. M., & Lewis, S. W.Is schizophrenia a neurodevelopmental disorder? British Medical Journal, 1987, 295, 681–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Ounstead, M., Cockburn, J., & Moar, V. A.Developmental assessment at four years: Are there any differences between children who do, or do not, cooperate? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1983, 58, 286–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Owen, M. J., Lewis, S. W., & Murray, R. M.Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: A computed tomographic study. Psychological Medicine, 1988, 18, 331–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Palmer, P., Dubowitz, L. M. S., Levene, M. I., & Dubowitz, V.Development and neurological progress of preterm infants with intraventricular haemorrhage and ventricular dilation. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1982, 57, 748–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Pape, K. E., Blackwell, R. J., Cusick, G., Sherwood, A., Houang, M. T. W., Thorburn, R. J., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Ultrasound detection of brain damage in preterm infants. Lancet, 1979, ii, 1261–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Stewart, A. L. Prediction of long-term outcome in high-risk infants: The use of objective measures of brain structure and function in the neonatal intensive care unit. In Patel, N. (ed.), Bailliere’s clinical obstetrics and gynaecology, Vol. 2, No. 1. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1988, 221–36.Google Scholar
21.Stewart, A. L., Reynolds, E. O. R., Hope, P. L., Hamilton, P. A.Baudin, J., Costello, A. M. deL., Bradford, B. C., & Wyatt, J. S.Probability of neurodevelopmental disorders estimated from ultrasound appearance of brains of very preterm infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1987, 29, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Stewart, A. L., Hope, P. L., Hamilton, P. A., Costello, A. M. deL., Baudin, J., Bradford, B. C., Amiel-Tison, C., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Prediction in very preterm infants of satisfactory neurodevelopmental progress at 12 months. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1988, 30, 53–63.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Susser, M. The quantification of risk factors in major neurodevelopmental disorders. In Kubli, F., Patel, N., & Booth, G. (eds.), Perinatal events and brain damage in surviving children. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1988, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Wyatt, J. S., Cope, M., Delpy, D. T., Wray, S., & Reynolds, E. O. R.Quantification of cerebral oxygenation and haemodynamics in sick newborn infants by near infrared spectrophotometry. Lancet, 1986, ii, 1063–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar