Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-j65dx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T18:39:03.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE EFFECT OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT USE IN POSTLINGUALLY DEAF ADULTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2001

Paul F. M. Krabbe
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen
Johannes B. Hinderink
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen
Paul van den Broek
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) on thehealth status of postlingually deaf adults.

Methods: Participantscomprised 45 postlingually deaf adult multichannel CI users and 46deaf candidates on the waiting list for a CI. The latter group actedas control subjects to corroborate the validity of retrospective completionof the questionnaires by the CI recipients. Three HRQOL instrumentswere used: a) a specially developed CI questionnaire (NCIQ); b) ageneric HRQOL questionnaire (SF-36); and c) a health-stateclassification system (HUI-2) suited to estimate single preferencescores.

Results: Retrospectively estimated pre-implant scores in theCI user group corresponded very well with the scores in the controlgroup. Postimplant scores in the CI users were substantially higherin all six domains (p < .001) of the NCIQ than the scores in thecontrol group. Effects due to a CI were also observed with the SF-36 infive of the seven domains (p < .01). Statistically significantdifferences between the two groups (p = .001) were observed in twoof the six domains of the HUI-2.

Conclusions: All threequestionnaires detected improvements in HRQOL due to CI use. To makea detailed assessment of the effect of a CI on functional outcomesand well-being, a special purpose HRQOL instrument is far moreadequate than a general HRQOL instrument. This study also showed thata CI affects several other health domains besides auditoryperformance. The effect of CI use on general functioning and well-being proved to be considerable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable