Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T09:50:29.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Organ Transplantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Tore Scherstén ,
Hans Brynger ,
Ingvar Karlberg  and
Egon Jonsson
Tore Scherstén
Affiliation:
University of Göteborg
Hans Brynger
Affiliation:
University of Göteborg
Ingvar Karlberg
Affiliation:
University of Göteborg
Egon Jonsson
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1958 Joseph Murray and associates reported the first successful kidney transplantation between two identical twins at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston (14). Since then organ transplantation has advanced rapidly. Renal transplantation is now a standard treatment for irreversible renal failure, and liver transplantation is an accepted method for treating end-stage liver disease. A number of patients have survived more than 20 years after renal transplantation and more than 10 years after liver transplantation (20). Very few liver transplantations have been performed in Sweden but this method is expected to become more common in the near future.

Information

Type
Special Section: Transplantation and Artificial Organs
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1986 , pp. 545 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J.Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979, 168–200.Google Scholar
2.Campbell, A., & Converse, P. E.The quality of American life 1978. N. Harbour Michigan Interuniversity Consortium for political and social research, 1980.Google Scholar
3.Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L.The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluation and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.Google Scholar
4.The Canadian Multicenter Transplant Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of Cy-closporin in cadaveric renal transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 1983, 309, 809–11.Google Scholar
5.Dickson, R. H., & Laszlo, J.Utilization of clinical chemistry services by medical housestaff and analyses. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1974, 134, 1064–67.Google Scholar
6.Ferguson, R. M., Rynasiewcz, J. J., Sutherland, D. et al. Cyclosporin A in renal transplantation: A prospective randomized trial. Surgery, 1982, 92, 175–81.Google Scholar
7.Gutman, R. A., Stead, W. W., & Robinson, R. R.Physical activity and employment status of patients on maintenance of dialysis. New England Journal of Medicine, 1981, 304, 309–13.Google Scholar
8.Ivy, G. L., Richie, R. E., Gary, D.et al. Renal transplantation—a 20-year experience in a veterans administration medical center. Archives of Surgery, 1985, 120, 1021–25.Google Scholar
9.Krakauer, H., Grauman, J. S., McMullan, M. R., & Creede, C.The recent U.S. experience in the treatment of end-stage renal disease by dialysis and transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 1983, 308, 1558–61.Google Scholar
10.Linn, B. S., Stephenson, S. E., Bergstresser, P., & Smith, J.Do dollars relate to outcome in burn care? Medical Care, 1979, 27, 835–43.Google Scholar
11.Martin, S. P., Donaldson, M. C., London, C. D. et al. Inputs into coronary care during 30 years. Cost-effectiveness study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1974, 81, 289–93.Google Scholar
12.Matas, A. J., Tellis, W. A., Veyth, F. J. et al. The faith of the patient returned to hemodialysis after loosing a renal transplant. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1953, 250, 1053–57.Google Scholar
13.Morris, P. J.Renal transplantation—1982. Transplantation Proceedings, 1983, 15, 1033–35.Google Scholar
14.Murray, J. E., Merrill, J. P., & Harrison, I. H.Kidney transplantation between 7 couples of identical twins. Annals of Surgery, 1958, 148, 343–59.Google Scholar
15.Najarian, J. S.Immunologic aspects of organ transplantation. Hospital Practice, 1982, 61–64.Google Scholar
16.Najarian, J. S., Ferguson, R. M., Sutherland, D. et al. A prospective trial of the efficacy of Cyclosporin in renal transplantation at the university of Minnesota. Transplantation Proceedings, 1983, 15, 438–41.Google Scholar
17.Rolles, K., Williams, R., Neuberger, J., & Calne, R. Y.The Cambridge and King's College Hospital experience of liver transplantation, 1968–1983. Hepatology, 1984, 4, 50–55.Google Scholar
18.Shaw, B. W., Martini, D. I., Marquez, J. M. et al. Venous bypass in clinical liver transplantation. Annals of Surgery, 1984, 200, 524–34.Google Scholar
19.Standards Committee of the American Society of transplant surgeons (current results and expectations of renal transplantation). Journal of the American Medical Association, 1981, 246, 1330–36.Google Scholar
20.Starzl, T. E., Iwatsuki, S., van Thiel, D. H. et al. Evolution of liver transplantation. Hepatology, 1982, 2, 614–636.Google Scholar
21.Starzl, T. E., Rosenthal, J. T., Hakala, T. R., Iwatsuki, S. et al. Steps in immuno-suppression for renal transplantation. Kidney International, 1983, 23, 560–66.Google Scholar
22.Van Thiel, D. H., Schade, R. R., Starzl, T. E. et al. Liver transplantation in adults. Hepatology, 1982, 2, 637–40.Google Scholar
23.The liver transplantation—report of consensus NIH-conference. Hepatology, 1984, 4, 1–110.Google Scholar