No CrossRef data available.
Challenges in design and realization of large-sized and widely-separated Ku-Tx-Rx contoured-beam Gregorian reflector antenna
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2025
Abstract
A ϕ2.5 m Gregorian antenna has been designed, analyzed, developed, and tested for a contoured beam for India and its Islands. The downlink band is 11.7–12.2 GHz. Uplink band is 17.3–17.8 GHz. The frequency band ratio is 1:1.52. The feed system consists of a radial corrugated horn and a turnstile orthomode transducer. Since there is a common feed system for Ku-Tx and Ku-Rx bands, it causes a large variation in the phase center for Tx and Rx bands. This large disparity in Tx and Rx phase center makes shaping challenging to achieve higher edge of coverage (EoC) gain, over widely separated transmit and receive bands. The optimization is carried out to achieve enhanced EoC gain and compliance of cross-polar isolation (XPI) through surface shaping of main and sub-reflectors. We have also optimized the feed coordinate to achieve the goal. The scattered near field at feed aperture is also minimized to get good XPI. Minimum radius of curvature of the surfaces has been controlled, which is required for the manufacturing of sub- and main-reflectors with minimum fabrication error. A new technique has been devised for the accommodation of a Gregorian antenna on a spacecraft with suitable radio frequency (RF) clearance. The impact of photogrammetry targets on RF performance is also brought out in the article.
Information
- Type
- Research Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.
References
Gupta, RC, Sagi, SK and Mahajan, MB (2019) Parallel-shaping technique for a ring-focus reflector antenna: A multiband Gregorian ring-focus reflector antenna for the Satcom flyaway terminal. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 61(5), pp. 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2019.2932306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, SK, Rao, S and Shafai, L (2013) Handbook of Reflector Antennas and Feed Systems: Theory and Design of Reflectors. Bostan: Artech House. Vol. I.Google Scholar
Stutzman, W and Terada, M (1993) Design of offset-parabolic-reflector antennas for low cross-pol and low sidelobes. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 35, pp. 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/74.248488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granet, (1998) Designing axially symmetric Cassegrain and Gregorian dual-reflector antennas from combinations of prescribed geometric parameters. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 40, pp. 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/74.683545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, AJ, Mills, JH, Robey, FC, Dufilie, P and Hecht, MH (2019) Axisymmetric Gregorian Reflector System for a Space-Deployed Inflatable Antenna: Simulations and Measurements. 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array System & Technology (PAST), pp. 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/PAST43306.2019.9021054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerfonteyn, WJ, Mokhupuki, FTT and De Villiers, DIL (2022) Frequency ripple in antenna noise temperature of small offset gregorian reflector systems. 2022 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), pp. 207–211, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEAA49419.2022.9900010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmensiek, R and de Villiers, DIL (2021) An optimal 18 m shaped offset gregorian reflector for the ngVLA radio telescope. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 69(12), pp. 8282–8290. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2021.3090827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh Chandra Gupta, SKS and Mahajan, MB (2019) Shaping of Offset Gregorian Reflector Antenna for Enhanced Performance during Beam-Steering in Multi-Position. 2019 IEEE Indian Conference on Antennas and Propogation (InCAP), pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/InCAP47789.2019.9134502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravanelli, R, Lubrano, V and Iannicelli, C (2012) Struts scattering effects on high performance spacecraft antenna. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), pp. 846–849, https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCAP.2012.6206086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granet, C (2002) Designing classical offset Cassegrain or Gregorian dual-reflector antennas from combinations of prescribed geometric parameters. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 44(3), pp. 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2002.1028736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, J, Yan, T and Wang, F (2018) A hybrid reflector antenna for two contoured beams with different shapes. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 17(7), pp. 1171–1175. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2018.2836927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pino, AG et al. (2005). A Gregorian confocal reflector antenna with adjustable subreflector for the hybrid mechanical-electronic pointing system at the satellite Q/V band. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2B, pp. 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1109/APS.2005.1552054CrossRefGoogle Scholar