Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-7vssv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-08T23:49:29.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precession-Nutation Estimates from Optical Astrometry 1899.7–1992.0 and Comparison with VLBI Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jan Vondrák  and
Cyril Ron
Jan Vondrák
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Boční II, 141 31 Prague 4, Czech Republic
Cyril Ron
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Boční II, 141 31 Prague 4, Czech Republic

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The most recent solution of Earth orientation parameters from the observations made by optical astrometry in 1899.7-1992.0 at 33 observatories is used to estimate the corrections of the present IAU model of precession-nutation. Since the resolution of the solution is about five days, only the terms with periods of 14 days and longer are considered. The results are compared with VLBI-based corrections of the standard precession-nutation model, and the differences are discussed.

Information

Type
Section 2. Improved Definitions and Models
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 180: Towards Models and Constants for Sub-Microarcsecond Astrometry , March 2000 , pp. 248 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © US Naval Observatory 2000

References

Bizouard, Ch., Capitaine, N., Ron, C. & Vondrák, J., 1997, in Proc. IAU Coll. 165 Dynamics and astrometry of natural and artificial celestial bodies, Wytrzyszczak, I., Lieske, J., Feldman, R.A. (eds.), Kluwer, 481–486.Google Scholar
Feissel, M. & Mignard, F., 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 331, L33–L36.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J., Lindegren, L., Perryman, M.A.C, et al., 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 323, 620–633.Google Scholar
Lieske, J.H., Lederle, T., Fricke, W. & Morando, B., 1977, Astron. Astrophys., 58, 1–16.Google Scholar
Seidelmann, P.K., 1982, Celest. Mech., 27, 79–106.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., Feissel, M. & Essaïfi, N., 1992, Astron. Astrophys., 262, 329–340.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., Pešek, I., Ron, C. & Čepek, A., 1998a, Pub. Astron. Inst. Acad. Sci. Czech Rep., 87, 1–56.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., Ron, C., Pešek, I. & Čepek, A., 1998b, in Journées 1997 Systèmes de référence spatio-temporels, Vondrák, J. & Capitaine, N. (eds.), Astron. Inst. Prague & Observatoire de Paris, 118–121.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., Ron, C. & Pešek, I., 2000, in Proc. IAU Coll. 178 Polar motion: historical and scientific aspects, Dick, S., McCarthy, D. & Luzum, B. (eds.), ASP, 239–250.Google Scholar
Yaya, P., Bizouard, Ch. & Ron, C. 2000, in Proc. IAU Coll. 178 Polar motion: historical and scientific aspects, Dick, S., McCarthy, D. & Luzum, B. (eds.), ASP, 607–612.Google Scholar