Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-09T15:39:19.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The CEP and Geophysical Interpretation of Modern Earth Rotation Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Aleksander Brzeziński
Aleksander Brzeziński*
Affiliation:
Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bartycka 18 A, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: alek@cbk.waw.pl

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The definition of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole (CEP) which is the pole of reference for precession and nutation, should be revised taking into account recent advances in observation and theory. This paper reviews the current realization of the CEP and discusses possible extensions of both the conceptual definition and the realization of the CEP. Attention is focused on the corresponding connections between the Earth orientation parameters describing rotational variations and the related excitation parameters expressing dynamics of the geophysical fluids.

Information

Type
Part 7. Modern Definition of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 585 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Bizouard, Ch., Brzeziński, A., & Petrov, S.D. 1998, Journal of Geodesy, 72, 561.Google Scholar
Bizouard, Ch., Gontier, A.-M, & Mathews, P.M. 1999, presented at XXIth IUGG General Assembly, Birmingham.Google Scholar
Brzeziński, A. 1992, manuscripta geodaetica, 17, 3.Google Scholar
Brzeziński, A. 1994, manuscripta geodaetica, 19, 157.Google Scholar
Brzeziński, A. & Capitaine, N. 1993, Journal of Geophys. Res., 98, No. B4, 6667.Google Scholar
Brzeziński, A. & Capitaine, N. 1995, in Proc. Journées Systèmes de Reference Spatio-Temporels 1995, Space Res. Centre PAS, Warsaw, 53.Google Scholar
Brzeziński, A. & Petrov, S.D. 1999, IERS Technical Note, submitted.Google Scholar
Capitaine, N. 1986, A&A, 162, 323.Google Scholar
Capitaine, N. & Brzeziński, A. 1998, in Proc. Journées Systèmes de Référence Spatio-Temporels 1998, Paris Observatory, 155.Google Scholar
Capitaine, N., Williams, J.G., & Seidelmann, P.K. 1985, A&A, 146, 381.Google Scholar
Eubanks, T.M. 1993, in Contributions of Space Geodesy to Geodynamics: Earth Dynamics, Geodynamics Series, Vol. 24, Smith, D. E. & Turcotte, D. L., American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, P.M. 1998, in Proc. Journées Systèmes de Référence Spatio-Temporels 1998, Paris Observatory, 161.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D.D. (ed.) 1996, IERS Technical Note 21, Paris Observatory.Google Scholar
Munk, W.H. & MacDonald, G.J.F. 1960, The Rotation of the Earth: A Geophysical Discussion, Cambridge Univ. Press (reprint 1975).Google Scholar
Seidelmann, P.K. 1982, Cel. Mech., 27, 79.Google Scholar