Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-jkt97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-15T18:16:41.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susceptibility of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci to Environmental Disinfectants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Roger L. Anderson ,
Janice H. Carr ,
Walter W. Bond  and
Martin S. Favero
Roger L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Janice H. Carr
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Walter W. Bond
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Martin S. Favero
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Hospital Infections Program, CDC, 1600 Clifton Rd, 1-B383, M/S C01, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the susceptibilities of vancomycin-resistant and -sensitive enterococci (VRE and VSE) to various concentrations of commonly used, commercial, hospital-grade disinfectants.

Design:

A microbial suspension test using inocula of 108 cells per mL in a disinfectant test dilution was used to determine inactivation kinetics of the test strains. In each test, 1-mL aliquots were removed from the cell-disinfectant mixtures at 15 and 30 seconds and then at 1-minute intervals for 5 minutes and neutralized. Appropriate serial dilutions were plated on agar medium for enumeration of survivors.

Results:

VRE and VSE challenge inocula (in the absence of any additional protein or serum challenge) were below the limit of detection (5 colony-forming units/mL) after 15 seconds' exposure to the manufacturers' suggested use-dilutions of quaternary ammonium, phenolic, or iodophor germicidal detergents. In subsequent tests, when the disinfectants were diluted far beyond the recommended use-dilutions (extended dilution), no differences were demonstrated between the susceptibilities of VRE and VSE.

Conclusions:

VRE and VSE are sensitive to a spectrum of commonly used environmental disinfectants and have parallel inactivation rates when challenged with extended dilutions of these products. Our findings did not demonstrate a relationship between antibiotic and germicide resistance. Routine disinfection and housekeeping protocols presently used in hospitals need not be altered due to concerns about the potential for environmentally mediated transmission of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , March 1997 , pp. 195 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Boyce, JM, Opal, SM, Chow, JW, et al. Outbreak of multidrugresistant Enterococcus faecium with transferable van B class vancomycin resistance. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1148–1153.Google Scholar
2. Rubin, LG, Tucci, V, Cercenado, E, Eliopoulos, G, Isenberg, HD. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in hospitalized children. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:700–705.Google Scholar
3. Karanfil, LV, Murphy, M, Josephson, A, et al. A cluster of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:195–200.Google Scholar
4. Handwerger, S, Raucher, B, Altarac, D, et al. Nosocomial outbreak due to Enterococcus faecium highly resistant to vancomycin, penicillin, and gentamicin. Clin Infect Dis 1993;16:750–755.Google Scholar
5. Uttley, AHC, George, RC, Naidoo, J, et al. High-level vancomycinresistant enterococci causing hospital infections. Epidemiol Infect 1989;103:173–181.Google Scholar
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nosocomial enterococci resistant to vancomycin—United States, 1989-1993. MMWR 1993;42:597–599.Google Scholar
7. Livornese, LL, Dias, S, Samel, C, et al. Hospital-acquired infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium transmitted by electronic thermometers. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:112–116.Google Scholar
8. Wells, VD, Wong, ES, Murray, BE, Coudron, PE, Williams, DS, Markowitz, SM. Infections due to beta-lactamase-producing, high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis . Ann Intern Med 1992;116:285–292.Google Scholar
9. Rhinehart, E, Smith, NE, Wennersten, C, et al. Rapid dissemination of B-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-resistant Enterococcus faecalis among patients and staff on an infanttoddler surgical ward. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1814–1818.Google Scholar
10. Coudron, PE, Mayhall, CG, Facklam, RR, et al. Streptococcus faecium outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 1984;20:1044–1048.Google Scholar
11. Anderson, RL, Vess, RW, Carr, JH, Bond, WW, Panlilio, AL, Favero, MS. Investigations of intrinsic Pseudomonas cepacia contamination in commercially manufactured povidone-iodine. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:297–302.Google Scholar
12. Bloomfield, SF, Looney, E. Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of European suspension test for antimicrobial activity of disinfectants and antiseptics. J Appl Bacteriol 1992;73:87–93.Google Scholar
13. Haley, CE, Marling-Cason, M, Smith, JW, Luby, JP, Mackowiak, PA. Bactericidal activity of antiseptics against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . J Clin Microbiol 1985;21:991–992.Google Scholar
14. Berkelman, RL, Holland, BW, Anderson, RL. Increased bactericidal activity of dilute preparations of povidone-iodine solutions. J Clin Microbiol 1982;15:635–639.Google Scholar
15. Stickler, DJ, King, JB, Russell, AD, Bloomfield, SF, Elsmore, R, Day, MJ. Bacterial sensitivity and resistance. In: Russell, AD, Hugo, WB, Ayliffe, GAJ, eds. Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation, and Sterilization. 2nd ed. London, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992:211–273.Google Scholar
16. Russell, AD, Gould, GW. Resistance of Enterobacteriaceae to preservatives and disinfectants. J Appl Bacteriol 1988;65(symposium series):167S–195S.Google Scholar
17. Russell, AD, Hammond, SA, Morgan, JR. Bacterial resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants. J Hosp Infect 1986;7:213–225.Google Scholar
18. Rutala, WA, Stiegel, MM, Sarubbi, FA, Weber, DJ. Susceptibility of antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant hospital isolates of bacteria to disinfectants. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. In press.Google Scholar
19. Rutala, WA, Stiegel, MM, Sarubbi, FA. Ineffectiveness of disinfectants against hospital strains of bacteria. In: Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology; 1982;233. Abstract Q 138.Google Scholar
20. Sattar, SA, Springthorpe, VS. Methods under development for evaluating antimicrobial activity of chemical germicides. In: Rutala, WA, ed. Chemical Germicides in Health Care. Morin Heights, Quebec, Canada: Polyscience Publications, Inc; 1995:237–254.Google Scholar
21. Bond, WW. Activity of chemical germicides against certain pathogens: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). In: Rutala, WA, ed. Chemical Germicides in Health Care. Morin Heights, Quebec, Canada: Polyscience Publications, Inc; 1995:135–147.Google Scholar
22. Best, M. Development of a Combined Carrier Test for Disinfectant Efficacy. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: University of Ottawa, Microbiology and Immunology; 1994. Thesis.Google Scholar
23. Sakuragi, T, Yanagisawa, K, Dan, K. Bactericidal activity of skin disinfectants on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Anesth Analg 1995;81:555–558.Google Scholar
24. Kobayashi, H, Tsuzuki, M, Hosobuchi, K. Bactericidal effects of antiseptics and disinfectants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1989;10:562–564.Google Scholar
25. Favero, MS. Discussion. In: Rutala, WA, ed. Chemical Germicides in Health Care. Morin Heights, Quebec, Canada: Polyscience Publications, Inc; 1995:84.Google Scholar