Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-nk9cn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-21T17:39:34.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Claude Martin ,
Xavier Viviand  and
Frédéric Potié
Claude Martin*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Traumatology, Hôpital Nord, Cedex, France
Xavier Viviand
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Traumatology, Hôpital Nord, Cedex, France
Frédéric Potié
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Traumatology, Hôpital Nord, Cedex, France
*
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Traumatology, Hôpital Nord, 13915 Marseilles, Cedex 20, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The perioperative use of antibiotics is an established and accepted technique for the prevention of postoperative infection. Intravenous administration often is preferred, and intramuscular administration is possible, although it has certain drawbacks. This article examines a variety of other routes of administration for delivering antibiotics locally to the surgical site. These techniques merit further study in prospectively randomized trials.

Information

Type
From the Fourth International Conference on the Prevention of Infection
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 17 , Issue 8 , August 1996 , pp. 539 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Martin, C, Bantz, P, Gouin, F. Indications de l'antibioprophylaxie en chirurgic digestive. In: Martin, C, ed. Antibioprophylaxie en Milieu Chirurgical, I. 2ème édition. Paris, France: 2M2 Edit;1994;67-73:119–141.Google Scholar
2. Kaiser, AB, Clayson, KR, Mulherin, JL, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular surgery. Ann Surg 1978;188:283–289.Google Scholar
3. Pitt, HA, Postier, RG, MacGowan, WL, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in vascular surgery: topical, systemic, or both? Ann Surg 1980;192:356–363.Google Scholar
4. Lord, JW Jr, Rossi, G, Daliana, M. Intraoperative antibiotic wound lavage: an attempt to eliminate postoperative infection in arterial and clean-contaminated general surgical procedures. Ann Surg 1975;185:634–641.Google Scholar
5. Evans, C, Pollock, AV. The reduction of surgical wound infection by prophylactic parenteral cephaloridine. Br J Surg 1973;60:434–437.Google Scholar
6. Szilagi, DE, Smith, RF, Elliot, JP. Infection in arterial reconstruction with synthetic graft. Ann Surg 1972;176:321–333.Google Scholar
7. Lord, JW Jr, La Raja, RD, Daliana, M, Gondon, MT. Prophylactic antibiotic wound irrigation in gastric, biliary, and colonic surgery. Am J Surg 1983;145:209–212.Google Scholar
8. Sarr, MG, Parikh, KJ, Sanfey, H, Minken, SL, Cameron, JL. Topical antibiotic in high-risk biliary surgical patient. A prospective, randomized study. Am J Surg 1988;155:337–342.Google Scholar
9. Mehigan, D, Zuidema, GD, Cameron, J. The role of systemic antibiotics in colon surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:573–576.Google Scholar
10. Finch, DRA, Taylor, L, Morris, PJ. Wound sepsis following gastrointestinal surgery: a comparison of topical and two-dose systemic cephradine. Br J Surg 1979;66:580–582.Google Scholar
11. Sutherland, RD, La Wayne Miller, O, Martinez, HE, Guynes, WA. Coronary arterial bypass operation without antibiotic coverage. Chest 1979;76:174–175.Google Scholar
12. Vander Salm, TJ, Okike, OM, Pasque, MK. Reduction of sternal infections by application of topical vancomycin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:618–622.Google Scholar
13. Long, WH, Rudd, EG, Dillon, MB. Intra-uterine irrigation with cefamendol nafate solution at cesarean section: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138:755–758.Google Scholar
14. Andersen, B, Korner, B, Ostergaard, AH. Topical ampicillin against wound infection after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 1972;176:129–132.Google Scholar
15. Juul, P, Merrild, U, Kronborg, O. Topical ampicillin in addition to systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:804–806.Google Scholar
16. Nash, AG, Hugh, TB. Topical ampicillin and wound infection in colon surgery. Br Med J 1967;1:471–472.Google Scholar
17. Raahave, D, Hesselfeldt, P, Pedersen, T, Zachariassen, A, Kann, D, Hansen, OH. No effect of topical ampicillin prophylaxis in elective operations of the colon or rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;168:112–114.Google Scholar
18. Martin, C, Bantz, P, Gouin, F. Indications de l'antibioprophylaxie en chirurgic vasculaire. Anibioprophylaxie en Milieu Chirurgical, I. 2ème édition. Paris, France: 2M2 Edit;1994;230:67–73.Google Scholar
19. Pollock, AV, Evans, M, Smith, GMR. Pre-incisional intraparietal Augmentin® in abdominal operations. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1989;71:97–100.Google Scholar
20. Greenall, MJ, Atkinson, JE, Evans, M, Pollock, AV. Single dose antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical sepsis: which route of administration is best? A controlled clinical trial of intra-incisional against intravenous cephaloridin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1981;7:223–227.Google Scholar
21. Tanner, AG. Is preoperative intra-incisional, intraparietal injection of antibiotics the ideal mode of administration as prophylaxis in abdominal surgery? J Antimicrob Chemother 1984;19:305–308.Google Scholar
22. Taylor, TV, Walkers, WS, Mason, RC. Preoperative intraparietal (intra-incisional) cefoxitin in abdominal surgery. Br Med J 1982;69:461–462.Google Scholar
23. Hares, MM, Hegarty, DN, Warlow, J. A controlled trial to compare systemic and intraincisional cefuroxime prophylaxis in high risk gastric surgery. Br J Surg 1991;68:276–280.Google Scholar
24. Bier, A. Ueber einen neuen weg local anästhetic an den gliedmassen zu erzengen. Arch Klin Chir 1908;86:1007–1016.Google Scholar
25. Hoddinott, C, Lovering, AM, Fernando, HC, Dixon, JH, Reeves, DS. Determination of bone and fat concentrations following systemic cefamandole and regional cefuroxime administration in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990;26:823–829.Google Scholar
26. De Lalla, F, Novelli, A, Pellizzer, G, et al. Regional and systemic prophylaxis with teicoplanin in monolateral and bilateral total knee replacement procedures: study of pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:2693–2698.Google Scholar
27. Elledge, ES, Whidden, RF, Fraker, JT, Stambangh, KI. The effects of topical oral clindamycin rinses on the bacterial content of saliva in healthy human subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;105:836–839.Google Scholar
28. Kirchner, JC, Edberg, SC, Sasaki, CT. The use of topical oral antibiotics in head and neck prophylaxis: is it justified? Laryngoscope 1988;98:26–29.Google Scholar
29. Grandis, RJ, Vickers, RM, Rihs, JD, Yu, VL, Johnson, JT. Efficacy of topical amoxicillin plus clavulanate/ticarcillin plus clavulanate and clindamycin in contaminated head and neck surgery: effect of antibiotic spectra and duration therapy. J Infect Dis 1994;170:729–732.Google Scholar
30. Franson, TR, Sheth, NK, Menon, L. Persistent in vitro survival of coagulase-negative staphyloccocci adherent to intravascular catheter in the absence of conventional nutrients. J Clin Microbiol 1986;24:559–561.Google Scholar
31. Marrie, TJ, Nelligan, J, Costerton, JW. A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study of an infected endocardial pacemaker lead. Circulation 1982;66:1339–1341.Google Scholar
32. Avramovic, J, Fletcher, JP. Rifampicin impregnation of a protein-sealed Dacron® graft: an infection resistant prosthetic vascular graft. Aust N Z J Surg 1991;61:436–440.Google Scholar
33. Avramovic, J, Fletcher, JP. Prevention of prosthetic vascular graft infection by rifampicin impregnation of a protein-sealed Dacron graft in combination with parenteral cephalosporin. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1992;33:70–74.Google Scholar
34. McDougall, EG, Burnham, SJ, Jonhson, G. Rifampin protection against experimental graft sepsis. J Vasc Surg 1986;4:5–7.Google Scholar
35. Moore, WS, Chvapil, M, Seiffert, G, Keown, K. Development of an infection resistant vascular prosthesis. Arch Surg 1981;116:1403–1407.Google Scholar
36. Sobinsky, KR, Flanigan, DP. Antibiotic binding to polytetrafluoroethylene via glycosaminoglycan keratin luminal coating. Surgery 1986;100:649–634.Google Scholar
37. Baker, WH, Bodensteiner, JA. The administration of an antibiotic in vascular reconstructive surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1972;64:301–303.Google Scholar
38. Lehman, RA, West, RL, Leonard, F. Toxicity of alkyl 2-cyanoacrylates. Arch Surg 1966;93:447–450.Google Scholar
39. Ney, AL, Kelly, PH, Tsukayama, DT, Bubrich, MP. Fibrin glue-antibiotic suspension in the prevention of prosthetic graft infection. J Trauma 1990;30:1000–1005.Google Scholar
40. Greco, RS, Harvey, RA. The role of antibiotic bonding in the prevention of vascular prosthetic infections. Ann Surg 1992;195:168–171.Google Scholar
41. Shue, WB, Worosilo, SC, Donetz, AP, Trooskin, SZ, Harvey, RA, Greco, RS. Prevention of vascular prosthetic infection with an antibiotic bonded Dacron graft. J Vasc Surg 1988;8:600–605.Google Scholar
42. Goëau-Brissonnière, O, Leport, C, Bacourt, F, Lebrault, C, Pechere, JC. Prevention of vascular graft infection by rifampin bonding to a gelatine-sealed Dacron® graft. In: Second International Conference on the Prevention of Infections. Nice, France; April 1992:71. Abstract CL1.Google Scholar
43. Goëau-Brissonnière, O, Leport, C, Bacourt, F, Lebrault, C, Comte, R, Péchère, JC. Prevention of vascular graft infection by rifampin bonding to a gelatin-sealed Dacron graft. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:408,412.Google Scholar
44. Hill, C, Mazas, F, Flamant, R, Evrard, J. Prophylactic cefazolin versus placebo in total hip replacement. Lancet 1981;1:795–797.Google Scholar
45. Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, ESL, Whyte, W, Blowers, R, Stentery, SJ, Lowe, D. Effect of ultra-clean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomized study. Br Med J 1982;285:10–14.Google Scholar
46. Argenson, JN, Drancourt, M, Aubaniac, JM, Raoult, D. Vancomycin plus tobramycin impregnated cement for local antibioprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. The Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Chicago, IL; September 1991:312. Abstract 1278.Google Scholar
47. Buchholz, H, Engelbrecht, H. Uber die depotwirkung einiger antibiotica bei vermischung mit dem kunstharz palacos. Chirurg 1970;1:511–515.Google Scholar
48. Buchholz, HW, Gartmann, HD. Infections prophylaxe und operative behandlung der scheichenden tiefen infektion bei der totalen endoprothese. Chirurg 1972;43:446–453.Google Scholar
49. Lodenkämper, H, Londenkämper, U, Tompa, K. Uber die ausscheidung von antibiotica aus dem knochensement palacos. Z Tropenmed Parasitol 1982;120:801–805.Google Scholar
50. McQueen, M, Littlejohn, A, Hughues, SPF. A comparison of systemic cefuroxime and cefuroxime-loaded bone cement in the prevention of early infection after total joint replacement. Int Orthop 1987;11:241–243.Google Scholar
51. Seyral, P, Zannier, A, Argenson, JN, Raoult, D. The release in vitro of vancomycin and tobramycin from acrylic bone cement. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994;33:337–339.Google Scholar
52. Murray, WR. Use of antibiotic-containing bone cement. Clin Orthop 1984;190:89–95.Google Scholar
53. Bayston, R. Milner, E. The sustained release of antimicrobial drugs from bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg 1982;64B:460–464.Google Scholar
54. Elson, RA, Jephcott, AE, McGechie, DB, Verattas, D. Antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg 1977;59B:200–205.Google Scholar
55. Gardner, ADH, Mederaft, BA, Greig, H. Antibiotic bone cement mixtures in prevention of infection following total joint replacement. Lancet 1974;1:891.Google Scholar
56. Josefsson, EG. Prophylactic therapy in primary prosthesis of the hip: systemic antibiotic or antibiotic-containing bone cement? 13th International Congress Chemotherapy; June 1619, 1983; Vienna, Austria. Abstract SS 7.21.Google Scholar
57. Klemm, K. Posttraumatische osteomyelitis: temporäre implantation von Septopal®-Ketten zur ergänzenden lokalantibiotischen behandlung. Dtsch Arzteblatt 1970;39:2281–2289.Google Scholar
58. Seligson, D, Henry, SL. Treatment of compound fractures. Am J Surg 1991;161:693–697.Google Scholar
59. Henry, SL, Ostermann, PAW, Seligson, D. The prophylactic use of antibiotic impregnated beads in open fractures. J Trauma 1990;30:1231–1238.Google Scholar
60. Bowyer, GW, Cumberland, N. Antibiotic release from impregnated pellets and beads. J Trauma 1994;36:331–335.Google Scholar
61. Aubrey, DA, Jenkins, NJ, Morgan, P, Thomas, M. The use of gen-tamicin-PMMA chains in abdominal surgery: a pilot study of prophylaxis against wound infection. Pharmatherapeutica 1986;4:536–554.Google Scholar
62. Mühleder, H, Togél, K, Urbanek, H, Leibl, W. Gentamicin-poly-methylacrylate chains in colonic surgery. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 1988;20:105–111.Google Scholar
63. Rosen, HR, Marczell, AP, Czerwenka, E, Stierer, MO, Spoula, H, Wasl, H. Local gentamicin application for perineal wound healing following abdomino-perineal rectum excision. Am J Surg 1991;162:438–441.Google Scholar
64. Grayston, LS, Hansbourg, JF, Zapata-Sirvent, R, Roehrborn, AJ, Kim, S. Pharmacokinetics of DepoFoam gentamicine delivery system and effect on soft tissue infection. J Surg Res 1993;55:559–564.Google Scholar