Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-bnl7t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T17:53:11.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comprehensive Study of Costs Associated With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2016

Rodrigo Rodrigues ,
Grant E. Barber  and
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan
Rodrigo Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Grant E. Barber
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan*
Affiliation:
Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Address correspondence to Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, 9th floor, Boston, MA 02114 (aananthakrishnan@mgh.harvard.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common healthcare-associated infection and is associated with considerable morbidity. Recurrent CDI is a key contributing factor to this morbidity. Despite an estimated 83,000 recurrences annually in the United States, there are few accurate estimates of costs associated with recurrent CDI.

OBJECTIVE

We performed this study (1) to identify the health consequences of recurrent CDI including need for repeat hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and surgery; (2) to determine costs associated with recurrent CDI and identify determinants of such costs; and (3) to compare the outcomes and costs of recurrent CDI to those who develop reinfection.

METHODS

We identified all patients with confirmed recurrent CDI between January to December 2013 at a single referral center. Healthcare burden associated with recurrence including diagnostic testing, pharmacologic treatment, and inpatient and outpatient healthcare visits were identified in the 12 months following the first recurrence. Total healthcare costs were calculated, and the predictors of high healthcare utilization were identified.

RESULTS

Our study population included 98 patients with recurrent CDI. The median interval between the initial infection and recurrence was 37 days. The mean age of the cohort was 67 years, two-thirds were women (62%), and the mean Charlson index was 8.6. During the year following the first recurrence of CDI, each patient underwent a mean of 4.4 stool C. difficile toxin tests and received a mean of 2.5 prescriptions for oral vancomycin (range, 0–6). Most patients (84%) with recurrence had a CDI-related hospitalization, and 6% underwent colectomy. The mean total CDI-associated cost was $34,104 per patient, with hospitalization costs accounting for 68%, surgery 20%, and drug treatment 8% of this cost, respectively. Extrapolating to the United States overall, we estimate an annual cost of $2.8 billion related to recurrent CDI.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent CDI is associated with considerable morbidity and cost.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:196–202

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , February 2017 , pp. 196 - 202
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Ananthakrishnan, AN. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, risk factors and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;8:17–26.Google Scholar
2. Dubberke, ER, Wertheimer, AI. Review of current literature on the economic burden of Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:57–66.Google Scholar
3. Kelly, CP. A 76-year-old man with recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: review of C. difficile infection. JAMA 2009;301:954–962.Google Scholar
4. Pepin, J, Valiquette, L, Alary, ME, et al. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ 2004;171:466–472.Google Scholar
5. Rupnik, M, Wilcox, MH, Gerding, DN. Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009;7:526–536.Google Scholar
6. Wilcox, MH, Cunniffe, JG, Trundle, C, Redpath, C. Financial burden of hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 1996;34:23–30.Google Scholar
7. Lessa, FC, Mu, Y, Bamberg, WM, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 2015;372:825–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Cohen, SH, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:431–455.Google Scholar
9. Magill, SS, Edwards, JR, Bamberg, W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1198–1208.Google Scholar
10. Kyne, L, Hamel, MB, Polavaram, R, Kelly, CP. Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile . Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:346–353.Google Scholar
11. Mergenhagen, KA, Wojciechowski, AL, Paladino, JA. A review of the economics of treating Clostridium difficile infection. PharmacoEconomics 2014;32:639–650.Google Scholar
12. Garey, KW, Sethi, S, Yadav, Y, DuPont, HL. Meta-analysis to assess risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 2008;70:298–304.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, S. Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a review of risk factors, treatments, and outcomes. J Infect 2009;58:403–410.Google Scholar
14. McFarland, LV, Elmer, GW, Surawicz, CM. Breaking the cycle: treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1769–1775.Google Scholar
15. Surawicz, CM, Brandt, LJ, Binion, DG, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:478–498; quiz 499.Google Scholar
16. Louie, TJ, Miller, MA, Mullane, KM, et al. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 2011;364:422–431.Google Scholar
17. Lowy, I, Molrine, DC, Leav, BA, et al. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N Engl J Med 2010;362:197–205.Google Scholar
18. van Nood, E, Speelman, P, Kuijper, EJ, Keller, JJ. Struggling with recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: Is donor faeces the solution? Euro Surveill 2009;14:pii:19316.Google Scholar
19. van Nood, E, Vrieze, A, Nieuwdorp, M, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile . N Engl J Med 2013;368:407–415.Google Scholar
20. Aslam, S, Musher, DM. An update on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2006;35:315–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Debast, SB, Bauer, MP, Kuijper, EJ, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20(Suppl 2):1–26.Google Scholar
22. Konijeti, GG, Sauk, J, Shrime, MG, Gupta, M, Ananthakrishnan, AN. Cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for management of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a decision analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:1507–1514.Google Scholar
23. Varier, RU, Biltaji, E, Smith, KJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment strategies for initial Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:1343–1351.Google Scholar
24. Ghantoji, SS, Sail, K, Lairson, DR, DuPont, HL, Garey, KW. Economic healthcare costs of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:309–318.Google Scholar
25. Le Monnier, A, Duburcq, A, Zahar, JR, et al. Hospital cost of Clostridium difficile infection including the contribution of recurrences in French acute-care hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2015;91:117–122.Google Scholar
26. McFarland, LV, Surawicz, CM, Rubin, M, Fekety, R, Elmer, GW, Greenberg, RN. Recurrent Clostridium difficile disease: epidemiology and clinical characteristics. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:43–50.Google Scholar
27. Miller, MA, Hyland, M, Ofner-Agostini, M, Gourdeau, M, Ishak, M. Morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden of nosocomial Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in Canadian hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:137–140.Google Scholar
28. Shah, DN, Aitken, SL, Barragan, LF, et al. Economic burden of primary compared with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect 2016;93:286–289.Google Scholar
29. Khanna, S, Pardi, DS, Aronson, SL, et al. The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:89–95.Google Scholar
30. Wen, J, Barber, GE, Ananthakrishnan, AN. Identification of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection using administrative codes: accuracy and implications for surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:893–898.Google Scholar
31. Charlson, ME, Pompei, P, Ales, KL, MacKenzie, CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383.Google Scholar
32. Abou Chakra, CN, Pepin, J, Sirard, S, Valiquette, L. Risk factors for recurrence, complications and mortality in Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. PLoS One 2014;9:e98400.Google Scholar
33. Aslam, S, Hamill, RJ, Musher, DM. Treatment of Clostridium difficile–associated disease: old therapies and new strategies. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5:549–557.Google Scholar
34. Pepin, J, Alary, ME, Valiquette, L, et al. Increasing risk of relapse after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in Quebec, Canada. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:1591–1597.Google Scholar
35. Bauer, MP, van Dissel, JT, Kuijper, EJ. Clostridium difficile: controversies and approaches to management. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2009;22:517–524.Google Scholar
36. Aitken, SL, Joseph, TB, Shah, DN, et al. Healthcare resource utilization for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in a large university hospital in Houston, Texas. PLoS One 2014;9:e102848.Google Scholar
37. Dubberke, ER, Olsen, MA. Burden of Clostridium difficile on the healthcare system. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:S88–S92.Google Scholar
38. Dubberke, ER, Reske, KA, Olsen, MA, McDonald, LC, Fraser, VJ. Short- and long-term attributable costs of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in nonsurgical inpatients. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:497–504.Google Scholar
39. O’Brien, JA, Lahue, BJ, Caro, JJ, Davidson, DM. The emerging infectious challenge of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Massachusetts hospitals: clinical and economic consequences. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1219–1227.Google Scholar
40. Song, X, Bartlett, JG, Speck, K, Naegeli, A, Carroll, K, Perl, TM. Rising economic impact of clostridium difficile-associated disease in adult hospitalized patient population. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:823–828.Google Scholar
41. Olsen, MA, Yan, Y, Reske, KA, Zilberberg, M, Dubberke, ER. Impact of Clostridium difficile recurrence on hospital readmissions. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:318–322.Google Scholar
42. McFarland, LV. Renewed interest in a difficult disease: Clostridium difficile infections—epidemiology and current treatment strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2009;25:24–35.Google Scholar
43. Lapointe-Shaw, L, Tran, KL, Coyte, PC, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of six strategies to treat recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149521.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rodrigues supplementary material

Supplementary Table

Download Rodrigues supplementary material(File)
File 79.4 KB