Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T02:33:05.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence of Tuberculin Skin Test Positivity and Conversions Among Healthcare Workers in New York City During 1994 to 2001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sharlette Cook ,
Khin Lay Maw ,
Sonal S. Munsiff ,
Paula I. Fujiwara  and
Thomas R. Frieden
Sharlette Cook
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City, New York
Khin Lay Maw
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City, New York
Sonal S. Munsiff*
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City, New York Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Paula I. Fujiwara
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City, New York Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Thomas R. Frieden
Affiliation:
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City, New York Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 125 Worth Street, Room 216, CN 74, New York, NY 10013
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for tuberculin skin test positivity and conversion among New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene employees.

Design:

Point-prevalence survey and prospective cohort analysis. Sentinel surveillance was conducted from March 1,1994, to December 31, 2001.

Participants:

HCWs in high-risk and low-risk settings for occupational TB exposure.

Results:

Baseline tuberculin positivity was 36.2% (600 of 1,658), 15.5% (143 of 922) among HCWs born in the United States, and 48.5% (182 of 375) among HCWs not born in the United States. There were 36 tuberculin conversions during 2,754 observation-years (rate, 1.3 per 100 person-years). For HCWs born in the United States, the risk for tuberculin conversion was greater in high-risk occupational settings compared with low-risk settings (OR 5.7; CI95, 1.7–19.2; P < .01). HCWs not born in the United States and those employed at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) were at high risk for baseline tuberculin positivity (OR, 3.2; CI95,1.7–5.8; P < .001); OCME HCWs (OR 4.7; CI95, 2.3–9.4; P < .001), those of Asian ethnicity (OR 4.3; CI95,1.4–13.5; P < .01), and older HCWs (OR, 1.0; CI95,1.0–1.1; p < .05) were at a higher risk for conversion.

Conclusions:

Although the prevalence of tuberculin positivity decreased after the peak of the recent TB epidemic in New York City, the conversion rate among HCWs in high-risk occupational settings for TB exposure was still greater than that among HCWs in low-risk settings. Continued surveillance of occupational TB infection is needed, especially among high-risk HCWs.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 24 , Issue 11 , November 2003 , pp. 807 - 813
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Reider, HL, Cauthen, GM, Comstock, GW, Snider, DE Jr. Epidemiology of tuberculosis in the United States. Epidemiol Rev 1989;11:79–98.Google Scholar
2. Cantwell, MF, Snider, DE, Cauthen, GM, Onorato, IM. Epidemiology of tuberculosis in the United States, 1985 through 1992. JAMA 1994;272:535–539.Google Scholar
3. Frieden, TR, Fujiwara, PI, Washko, RM, Hamburg, MA. Tuberculosis in New York City: turning the tide. N Engl J Med 1995;333:229–233.Google Scholar
4. Pearson, ML, Jereb, JA, Frieden, TR, et al. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a risk to patients and health care workers. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:191–196.Google Scholar
5. Howell, JT, Scheel, WJ, Pryor, VL, Tavris, DR, Calder, RA, Wilder, MH. Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission in a health clinic: Florida, 1988. MMWR 1989;30:256–258.Google Scholar
6. Kao, AS, Ashford, DA, McNeil, MM, Warren, NG, Good, RC. Descriptive profile of tuberculin skin testing programs and laboratory-acquired tuberculosis infections in public health laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:1847–1851.Google Scholar
7. Ussery, XT, Bierman, JA, Valway, SE, Seitz, TA, DiFerdinando, GT Jr, Ostroff, SM. Transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among persons exposed in a medical examiner's office, New York. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:160–165.Google Scholar
8. Templeton, GL, Illing, LA Young, L, Cave, D, Stead, WW, Bates, JH. The risk for transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis at the bedside and during autopsy. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:922–925.Google Scholar
9. Curtis, AB, Ridzon, R, Novick, LF, et al. Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission patterns in a homeless shelter outbreak. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4:308–313.Google Scholar
10. Leonhardt, KK, Gentile, FG, Gilbert, BP, Aiken, MA. A cluster of tuberculosis among crack house contacts in San Mateo County, California. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1834–1836.Google Scholar
11. Center for Disease Control. Transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among immunocompromised persons in a correctional system: New York, 1991. MMWR 1992;41:507–509.Google Scholar
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health care facilities, 1994. MMWR 1994;43(RR-13):1–132.Google Scholar
13. Anonymous. Many hospitals unprepared as MDR-TB reported nationwide. Hosp Infect Control 1993;20:17–32.Google Scholar
14. Fridkin, SK, Manangan, L, Bolyard, E, Jarvis, WR. SHEA-CDC TB survey: Part I. Status of TB infection control programs at member hospitals, 1989-1992. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:129–134.Google Scholar
15. Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health. Information Summary 1996. New York: New York City Department of Health; 1996.Google Scholar
16. Harrington, JM, Shannon, HS. Incidence of tuberculosis, hepatitis, brucellosis, and shigellosis in British medical laboratory workers. Br Med J 1976;1:759–762.Google Scholar
17. Griffith, DE, Hardeman, JL, Zhang, Y, Wallace, RJ, Mazurek, GH. Tuberculosis outbreak among health care workers in a community hospital. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:808–811.Google Scholar
18. Sepkowitz, KA. Tuberculin skin testing and the health care worker: lessons of the Prophit Survey. Tuber Lung Dis 1996;77:81–85.Google Scholar
19. Jereb, JA, Klevens, M, Privett, TD, et al. Tuberculosis in health care workers at a hospital with an outbreak of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Arch Intern Med 1995;155:854–859.Google Scholar
20. Bangsberg, DR, Crowley, K, Moss, A Dobkin, JF, McGregor, C, Neu, HC. Reductions in tuberculin skin test conversions among medical house staff associated with improved tuberculosis infection control practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:566–570.Google Scholar
21. Maloney, SA Pearson, ML, Gordon, MT, Del Castillo, R, Boyle, JF, Jarvis, WR. Efficacy of control measures in preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis to patients and health care workers. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:90–95.Google Scholar