Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-xdcjr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-12T11:21:03.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brief Report Bactericidal Effects of Antiseptics and Disinfectants Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Hiroyoshi Kobayashi ,
Masakazu Tsuzuki  and
Kazunari Hosobuchi
Hiroyoshi Kobayashi*
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, the University of Tokyo Hospital
Masakazu Tsuzuki
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, the University of Tokyo Hospital
Kazunari Hosobuchi
Affiliation:
Tokyo Metropolitan Isotope Research Center
*
Surgical Center, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Japan, 113
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been causing a large number of serious hospital infections in some of the major hospitals in Japan. Among the precautions to prevent MRSA infection in hospitals, antisepsis or disinfection is one of the most universal. The in vitro activities of commonly used antiseptics and disinfectants against several strains of MRSA isolated in the University of Tokyo Hospital were evaluated.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 10 , Issue 12 , December 1989 , pp. 562 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Kelsey, JC, Maurer, IM. An improved (1974) Kelsey-Sykes test for disinfeciante. Pharmaceut J. 1974;213:528–530.Google Scholar
2. Schaefler, S, Jones, D Perry, W, Baradel, T, Mayr, E, Rampersad, C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in New York City hospital: inter-hospital spread of resistant strains of type 88. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;20:536–538.Google Scholar
3. MacNeil, JJ, Proudfoot, AD, Tosolini, FA, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Australian hospital. J Hosp Infect. 1984;5:18–28.Google Scholar
4. Cooke, EM, Casewell, MW, Emmerson, AM, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United Kingdom & Ireland. J Hosp Infect. 1988;8:143–148.Google Scholar
5. Ayliffe, GAJ, Duckworth, GJ, Brumfitt, W, et al. Guidelines for the control of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect. 1986;7:193–201.Google Scholar
6. Casewell, MW, Hill, RLR. Elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin (pseudomonic acid) a controlled trial. J Antimicrobial Chaoth. 1986;17:365–372.Google Scholar
7. Casewell, MW, Hill, RLR. The carrier state, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . J Antimkrob Chemother. 1986;18(Suppl A):1–12.Google Scholar
8. Haley, CE, Marling-Cason, M, Smith, JW, Luby, JP, Mackowiak, PA. Bactericidal activity of antiseptics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21:991–992.Google Scholar