Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-wf4rb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-25T12:12:18.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is where you are more important than who you are?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

Alan M. Saks  and
Jamie A. Gruman
Alan M. Saks*
Affiliation:
Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
Jamie A. Gruman
Affiliation:
Gordon S. Lang School of Business and Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: alan.saks@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 291 - 294
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguinis, H., Bradley, K. J., & Brodersen, A. (2014). Industrial-organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 284–303.10.1111/iops.12151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., Campbell, P. K., Bernal-Turnes, P., Drewry, J. M., & Edgerton, B. T. (2017). Most frequently cited sources, articles, and authors in industrial-organizational psychology textbooks: Implications for the science-practice divide, scholarly impact, and the future of the field. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10, 507–557.10.1017/iop.2017.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Weiss, H. M., & French, K. A. (2014). Industrial-organizational psychology’s chicken little syndrome. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 304–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., & Melick, S. R. (2020). Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 273–290.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chen, G., & Salas, E. (2017). One hundred years of the Journal of Applied Psychology: Background, evolution, and scientific trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 237–253.10.1037/apl0000192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2010). Organizational psychology and the tipping point of professional identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 241–258.Google Scholar