Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T23:05:25.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperfect Corrections or Correct Imperfections?: Psychometric Corrections in Meta-Analysis – ADDENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2015

Frederick L. Oswald ,
Seydahmet Ercan ,
Samuel T. McAbee ,
Jisoo Ock  and
Amy Shaw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Industrial and Organizational Psychology volume 7, issue 4, a commentary to the focal article Oswald et al.1 was unfortunately omitted. This commentary, “Imperfect Corrections or Correct Imperfections? Psychometric Corrections in Meta-Analysis,” by Frederick L. Oswald, Seydahmet Ercan, Samuel T. McAbee, Jisoo Ock, and Amy Shaw,2 is reproduced in the following pages.

Type
Addendum
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 305
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LeBreton, J. M., Scherer, K. T., & James, L. R. (2014). Corrections for criterion reliability in validity generalization: A false prophet in a land of suspended judgment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 478–500.Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Ercan, S., McAbee, S.T., Ock, J., & Shaw, A. (2015). Imperfect Corrections or Correct Imperfections? Psychometric Corrections in Meta-Analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, e1, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar