Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vpjdr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T20:35:27.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the intersection of culturally responsive principles and moral framing in diversity, equity, and inclusion training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2025

Emily Ann Gallegos Open the ORCID record for Emily Ann Gallegos [Opens in a new window] ,
Katrisha M. Smith Open the ORCID record for Katrisha M. Smith [Opens in a new window] ,
Patrick Rolwes Open the ORCID record for Patrick Rolwes [Opens in a new window]  and
Michelle P. Martín-Raugh Open the ORCID record for Michelle P. Martín-Raugh [Opens in a new window]
Emily Ann Gallegos*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
Katrisha M. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
Patrick Rolwes
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
Michelle P. Martín-Raugh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
*
Corresponding author: Emily Ann Gallegos; Email: eag9622@mavs.uta.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2025 , pp. 257 - 260
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallegos, E., Smith, K. M., Syed, J., Brooks, R. R., & Martín-Raugh, M. P. (2024). Strategic responses to anti-DEI legislation: The promise of culturally responsive assessments. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 17(4), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellerstedt, K., Uman, T., & Wennberg, K. (2024). Fooled by diversity? When diversity initiatives exacerbate rather than mitigate bias and inequality. Academy of Management Perspectives, 38(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, D., Bell, M. C., Blair, K. S. C., & Bloom, S. E. (2024). Cultural responsiveness in assessment, implementer training, and intervention in school, home, and community settings: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1–48, https://doi-org.ezproxy.uta.edu/10.1007/s10864-024-09547-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, D. A. (2009, November 7). The promise of customized training: Evidence from the United States. [Paper presentation]. Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunity and the University of Maryland School of Public Policy.Google Scholar
Maneethai, D., Johnson, L. U., Atwater, L. A., & Witt, L. A. (2025). Enhancing engagement in the diversity training experience: Morality processes matter. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18.Google Scholar
Montenegro, E., & Jankowski, N. A. (2017). Equity and assessment: Moving towards culturally responsive assessment. Occasional Paper, 29(6), 10–11.Google Scholar
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleeter, C. E. (2011). An agenda to strengthen culturally responsive pedagogy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911431472 Google Scholar
Walker, M. E., Olivera-Aguilar, M., Lehman, B., Laitusis, C., Guzman-Orth, D., & Gholson, M. (2023). Culturally responsive assessment: Provisional principles. ETS Research Report Series, 2023(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar