Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T05:21:44.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who's Zoomin’ Who? A Feminist, Queer Content Analysis of “Interdisciplinary” Human Sexuality Textbooks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Marilyn Myerson ,
Sara L. Crawley ,
Erica Hesch Anstey ,
Justine Kessler  and
Cara Okopny
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hundreds of thousands of students in introductory human sexuality classes read textbooks whose covert ideology reinforces dominant heteronormative narratives of sexual dimorphism, male hegemony, and heteronormativity. As such, the process of scientific discovery that proposes to provide description of existing sexual practices, identities, and physiohgies instead succeeds in cultural prescription. This essay provides a feminist, queer content analysis of such textbooks to illuminate their implicit narratives and provide suggestions for writing more feminist, queer-friendly texts.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Writing Against Heterosexism , Winter 2007 , pp. 92 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Titles with * are the books reviewed. Adam, Barry. 1998. Theorizing homophobia. Sexualities 1 (4): 387–404.10.1177/136346098001004001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allgeier, Elizabeth Rice, and Allgeier, Albert Richard. 2000. Sexual interactions. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Baglia, Jay. 2003. Building masculinity: Viagra and the performance of sexual health. Ph.D. diss., University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1999. The male body: A new look at men in public and in private. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Janell L. 2005. Sexuality now. Belmont, Calif.: Thompson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Crawley, Sara L. 2001. Are butch and fem working class and anti‐feminist? 32 15: 175–96.Google Scholar
Crawley, Sara L. 2002a. ‘They still don't understand why I hate wearing dresses’: An autoethnographic rant on dresses, boats, and butchness. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies 2: 69–92.Google Scholar
Crawley, Sara L. 2002b. Prioritizing audiences: Exploring the differences between stone butch and transgender identifications. Journal of Lesbian Studies 6: 11–24.10.1300/J155v06n02_04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, Sara L. 2002c. Narrating and negotiating butch and femme: Storying lesbian selves in a heteronormative world. Ph.D. diss., University of Florida.Google Scholar
Crawley, Sara L., and Broad, K. L. 2004. ‘Be your [real lesbian] self’: Mobilizing sexual formula stories through personal (and political) storytelling. 32 33: 39–71.Google Scholar
Crawley, Sara L., Foley, Lara J., and Shehan, Constance. Forthcoming. Gendering Bodies. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Rowman Littlefield Press.Google Scholar
Crooks, Robert, and Bauer, Karla. 2002. Our sexuality. 8th ed. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, Anke A. 2000. Gender, sexuality, and human development. In The role of theory in sex research, ed. Bancroft, John. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 1985. Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of sexuality, vol. 1, An introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. 1995. Vice versa. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jerrold S., Bruess, Clint E., and Haffher, Debra W. 2004. Exploring the dimensions of human sexuality. 2nd ed. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 1998. Female masculinity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Janet Shibley, and DeLamater, John D. 2006. Understanding human sexuality. 8th ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Chrys. 1996. The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. In Queer theory/sociology, ed. Seidman, Steven. Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jackson, Stevi. 1995. Gender and heterosexuality: A materialist feminist analysis. In (Hetero)sexual politics, ed. Maynard, and Purvis, .Google Scholar
Jackson, Stevi. 1999. Heterosexuality in question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jackson, Stevi, and Scott, Sue. 2002. Gender: A sociological reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathon Ned. 1995. The Invention of heterosexuality. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary F. 2004. Sexuality today. 7th ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne J. 1998. Lessons from the intersexed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne J., and McKenna, Wendy. 1978. Gender: An ethnomethodohgical approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Bruce M. 2005. Human sexuality today. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
LeVay, Simon, and Valente, Sharon M. 2003. Human sexuality. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Luke, Brian. 1998. Violent love: Hunting, heterosexuality, and the erotics of men's predation. Feminist Studies 24 (3): 627–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Maralee, and Rose, Ellen Cronan, eds. 1999. Meeting the challenge: Innovative feminist pedagogies in action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maynard, Mary, and Purvis, June, eds. (Hetero)sexual politics. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAnulty, Richard D., and Michelle Burnette, M. 2004. Exploring human sexuality. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
McCammon, Susan L., Knox, David, and Schacht, Caroline. 2004. Choices in sexuality. 2nd ed. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog.Google Scholar
McPhillips, Kathryn Braun, Virginia, and Gavey, Nicola. 2001. Defining (hetero)sex: How imperative is the cultural imperative? Women's Studies International Forum 24 (2), 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, Louise. 1995. The micropolitics of women's studies: Feminism and organizational change in the academy. In (Hetero)sexual politics, ed. Maynard, and Purvis, .Google Scholar
Myerson, Marilyn. 1986. The politics of sexual knowledge: Feminism and sexology textbooks. Frontiers: A Journal of Women's Studies 1 (1): 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Marilyn. 1992. Sex equity and sexuality in college‐level sex education. In Sex equity and sexuality in education, ed. Klein, Susan. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Myerson, Marilyn. 2000. Feminist approaches to sexuality. In The proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel O. Bowling Green, Ohio: Philosophy Document Center.Google Scholar
Myerson, Marilyn. 2004. Dispelling myths and expanding perspectives in sexuality education. American Sexuality Magazine 2 (4): 1–2.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda. 1995. Interpreting gender. In Social postmodernism: Beyond identity politics, ed. Nicholson, Linda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511520792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathus, Spencer A., Nevid, Jeffrey S., and Fichner‐Rathus, Lois. 2005. Human sexuality in a diverse world. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Rengel Phillips, Sarah. 1991. The hegemony of heterosexuality: A study of introductory texts. 32 19: 454–63.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1984. Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Pleasure and danger, ed. Vance, Carole S. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rust, Paula. 1995. Bisexuality and the challenge to lesbian politics. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Jack Myerson, Marilyn, and Kinder, Bill N. 1980. Human sexuality: Current perspectives. Tampa, Fla.: Mariner Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1990. Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven. 1996. Queer theory/sociology. Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snyder, Vicky L., and Broadway, Francis S. 2004. Queering high school biology textbooks. 32 41: 617–36.Google Scholar
Strong, Brian DeVault, Christine Sayad, Barbara, and Yarber, William. 2005. Human sexuality. 5th ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Tiefer, Leonore. 2004. Sex is not a natural act, and other essays. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Vance, Carol. 1980. Gender systems, ideology, and sex research: An anthropological analysis. Feminist Studies 6 (1): 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1993. Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jeffrey. 1981. Sex, politics and society: The regulation of sexuality since 1800. London: The Longman Group.Google Scholar
Weitz, Rose. 1992. The presentation of AIDS/HIV disease in introductory sociology textbooks. Teaching Sociology 20 (3): 239–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Candace, and Zimmerman, Don. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1 (2): 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1998. Long slow burn: Sexuality and social science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodward, Carolyn. 1996. Lesbianism in introductory women's studies textbooks: Toward a recognition of difference? In The new lesbian studies, ed. Zimmerman, Bonnie and McNaron, Toni A. H. New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Bonnie. 1982. One out of thirty: Lesbianism in women's studies textbooks. In Lesbian studies: Present and future, ed. Cruikshank, Margaret. New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar