Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-tldsr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-03T22:26:29.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teasing Feminist Sense from Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Timothy V. Kaufman-Osborn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We sometimes experience more than we can say, and often it is the “questions” posed by such nondiscursive reality to which feminist writings speak most profoundly. Feminists should therefore decline Richard Rorty's neopragmatist exhortation to forgo all appeals to “women's experience.” Invoking an alternative account of pragmatism's import for feminism, I explore the problematic relationship between the experience of being pregnant and the language we use in talking about it.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Pragmatism , Spring 1993 , pp. 124 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

De Lauretis, Teresa. 1986. Feminist studies/Critical studies: Issues, terms, and contexts. In Feminist studies/critical studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1979. Art as experience. New York: Paragon Books.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1981a. Experience and nature. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925‐1953, vol. 1, ed. Boydston, JoAnn. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1981b. Experience and philosophic method. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925‐1953, vol. 1, ed. Boydston, JoAnn. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Judith 1987.I feel therefore I am: A critique of female experience as the basis for a feminist epistemology. In Feminism and epistemology: Approaches to research in women and politics, ed. Falco, Maria. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1971. Knowledge and human interests, trans. Shapiro, Jeremy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy CM. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering Reality, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Heldke, Lisa. 1987. John Dewey and Evelyn Fox Keller: A shared epistemologieal tradition. Hypatia 2(3): 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman‐Osborn, Timothy. 1991. Politics/sense/experience: A pragmatic inquiry into the promise of democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1982. Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs 7(3): 515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 1990. The pragmatist and the feminist. Southern Califomia Law Review 63(6): 1699–1726.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1986. Of woman born. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991. Feminism and pragmatism. Michigan Quarterly Review 30(2): 231–58.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6(2): 342–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1991. The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry 17(4): 773–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1991. Where are all the pragmatist feminists?. Hypatia 6(2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar