Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-s7d9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-11T02:58:03.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“It Shouldn't Have to Be A Trade”: Recognition and Redistribution in Care Work Advocacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Cameron Lynne Macdonald  and
David A. Merrill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Care work straddles the divide between activities performed out of love and those performed for pay. The tensions created for workers by this divide raise questions concerning connections between recognition and redistribution. Through an analysis of mobilization among childcare workers, we argue that care workers can address redistribution and recognition simultaneously through vocabularies of both skill and virtue. We conclude with a discussion of strategies to overcome the false dichotomy between recognition and redistribution.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 17 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Love and Work , Spring 2002 , pp. 67 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acker, Joan. 1989. Doing comparable worth: Gender, class, and pay equity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bellm, Dan, Burton, Alice, Shukla, Renu, and Whitebook, Marcy. 1997. Making work pay in the childcare industry: Promising practices for improving compensation. Washington, D.C.: National Center for the Early Childhood Work Force (CCW).Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Center for the Childcare Workforce. 1998. Creating better childcare jobs: Model work standards for teaching staff in center‐based childcare. Washington, D.C.: National Center for the Early Childhood Work Force (CCW).Google Scholar
Center for the Childcare Workforce. 1999. Creating better family childcare jobs: Model work standards. Washington, D.C.: National Center for the Early Childhood Work Force (CCW).Google Scholar
Center for the Childcare Workforce. 2000. Current data on childcare salaries and benefits in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Center for the Early Childhood Work Force (CCW).Google Scholar
Daniels, Arlene K. 1987. Invisible work. Social Problems 34 (5): 403–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Timothy. 1992. Making gray gold. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, Paula, and Folbre, Nancy. 1999. The cost of caring. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561 (January): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1995. From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘Post‐Socialist’ age. New Left Review 212: 68–93.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1998. Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 19: 1–67.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2000. Rethinking recognition. New Left Review 10 (May/June): 107–21.Google Scholar
Glazer, Nona. 1991. Between a rock and a hard place: Racial, ethic, and class inequalities in women's professional nursing organizations. Gender and Society 5 (3): 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. 2000. Creating a caring society. Contemporary Sociology 29 (1): 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Suzanne. 2000. “Nurse, Interrupted,” The American Prospect 11 (7): 26–30.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1973. Theory and practice. Trans. Viertel, John. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1971. Hegel's logic. Trans A.V. Miller, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, Susan. 1999. Caring labor. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561 (January): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1995. The fragmented world of the social: Essays in social and political philosophy, ed. Wright, Charles W.Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1996. The struggle for recognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1997. Recognition and moral obligation. Social Research 64 (1): 16–35.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Cameron. 1996. Shadow mothers: Nannies, Au Pairs, and invisible work. In Working in the service society, ed. Macdonald, Cameron Lynne and Sirianni, Carmen. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Cameron. 1998. Manufacturing motherhood: The shadow work of nannies and au pairs. Qualitative Sociology 21 (1): 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, Cameron. Love and money: Recognizing and valuing care work. Presented at the Care Work Network Conference, 11 August 2000 in Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Cameron. Forthcoming. Shadow mothers: Nannies, au pairs, and the social construction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1844] 1963. Early writings. Trans. Bottomore, T. B.New York: McGraw‐Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Meehan, Johanna. 1995. Autonomy, recognition, and respect: Habermas, Benjamin, and Honneth. In Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse, ed. Meehan, Johanna. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, Julie. 1999. Of markets and martyrs: Is it ok to pay well for care? Feminist Economics 5 (3): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Margaret. 1996. Negotiated care: The experience of family day care providers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Deborah, Howes, Carollee, and Whitebook, Marcy. 1991. Childcare as an adult work environment. Journal of Social Issues 47 (2): 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Karen Brodkin. 1991. Does it pay to care? In Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives, ed. Abel, Emily and Nelson, Margaret. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki. 2000. Life's work. Columbia Law Review 100 (7): 1881–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 1999. Care and trembling. The American Prospect 43 (March/April): 61–67.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 2000a. Caring by the book. In Care work: Gender, class, and the welfare state, ed. Meyer, Madonna Harrington. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 2000b. Why we need a care movement. The Nation (13 March): 13–15.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuominen, Mary. 2000. The conflicts of caring: Gender, race, ethnicity, and individualism in family child‐care work. In Care work: Gender, class, and the welfare state, ed. Meyer, Madonna Harrington. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
U. S. Census Bureau. 1999. Statistical abstract of the United States, 1999. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1997. Caring for justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert R. 1997. Hegel's ethics of recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whitebook, Marcy, Howes, Carollee, and Phillips, Deborah. 1990. Who cares? Childcare teachers and the quality of care in America. Final report of the National Childcare Staffing Study. Washington, D.C.: Center for the Childcare Work Force.Google Scholar