Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-fz5kh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T02:47:19.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hetero‐Love in Patriarchy: An Autobiographical Substantiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Lena Gunnarsson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Musings
Information
Hypatia , Volume 32 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Love Studies, Winter 2017 , Winter 2017 , pp. 187 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bhaskar, Roy. 2002. The philosophy of meta‐reality: Creativity, love and freedom. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Teresa. 2004. The transmission of affect. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, Lena. 2011. A defence of the category “women.” Feminist Theory 12 (1): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, Lena. 2014. The contradictions of love: Towards a feminist‐realist ontology of sociosexuality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, Lena. 2015. Nature, love, and the limits of male power. Journal of Critical Realism 14 (3): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, Lena. n.d. “Love, feminism, and dialectics: Repairing splits in theory and practice.” In Feminism and the power of love: Interdisciplinary interventions, ed. García Andrade, Adriana, Gunnarsson, Lena, and Jónasdóttir, Anna G. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you: Sketch of a possible felicity in history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 2002. The way of love. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jónasdóttir, Anna G. 1994. Why women are oppressed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Jónasdóttir, Anna G. 2009. Feminist questions, Marx's method, and the theorization of “love power.” In The political interests of gender revisited, ed. Jónasdóttir, Anna G. and Jones, Kathleen B.Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Melanie. 1946. Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 27: 99–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Lerner, Harriet Goldhor. 1985. The dance of anger: A woman's guide to changing the patterns of intimate relationships. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Robinson, Hilary. 2001. The realm of the spirit: Introduction. In Feminism, art, theory: An anthology 1968–2000, ed. Robinson, Hilary. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2007. Melanie Klein and the difference affect makes. South Atlantic Quarterly 106 (3): 625–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. 2014. The times we're in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative “turn.” Feminist Theory 15 (1): 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar