Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T06:13:00.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE IMPACT OF STURGES BOURNE'S POOR LAW REFORMS IN RURAL ENGLAND – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2014

SAMANTHA A. SHAVE
SAMANTHA A. SHAVE*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 593
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

In this article Figure 1 was incorrectly duplicated as Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 is reproduced below.

Sources: A variety of British Parliamentary Papers 1821–1835. ‘Selected counties’ consist of Dorset, Hampshire, Somerset, Sussex and Wiltshire. For details see S. A. Shave, ‘Poor law reform and policy innovation in rural southern England, c.1780–1850’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton, 2010), pp. 146–7.

Fig. 2. Percentage of parishes in England and selected southern counties of England with an assistant overseer, 1819–1834.

References

REFERENCE

Shave, Samantha A., ‘The Impact of Sturges Bourne's Poor Law Reforms in Rural England’, Historical Journal, 56 (2013), pp. 399–429.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 2. Percentage of parishes in England and selected southern counties of England with an assistant overseer, 1819–1834.

Sources: A variety of British Parliamentary Papers 1821–1835. ‘Selected counties’ consist of Dorset, Hampshire, Somerset, Sussex and Wiltshire. For details see S. A. Shave, ‘Poor law reform and policy innovation in rural southern England, c.1780–1850’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton, 2010), pp. 146–7.