Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T19:11:07.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Derrida’s Neoplatonic Critique of Hegel: On the Gift of Being in Glas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2025

Dylan Shaul Open the ORCID record for Dylan Shaul [Opens in a new window]
Dylan Shaul*
Affiliation:
University of California Riverside, Riverside, USA
*
Corresponding author: Dylan Shaul; Email: dylan.shaul@ucr.edu
Get access

Abstract

This article argues that Derrida’s critique of Hegel in Glas should be understood as a modified Neoplatonic critique. Specifically, Derrida claims that Hegel’s systematic philosophical account of the speculative identity of Thought and Being is in fact conditioned by the prior unconditional gift of Being, which necessarily lies outside the Hegelian system. I argue that this gift of Being should be understood in terms of the Neoplatonic conception of the One, which likewise gives the gift of Being, while itself remaining beyond Being. After reconstructing Derrida’s critique, I consider and evaluate possible Hegelian responses, drawing on Hegel’s own reading of Neoplatonism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acosta López, M. R. (2012), ‘Hegel and Derrida on Forgiveness: The Impossible at the Core of the Political’, Derrida Today 5:1: 55–68.Google Scholar
Alvis, J. (2016), Marion and Derrida on the Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1984), Metaphysics in The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume II, trans. W. D. Ross, (ed).Barnes, J. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (1997), ‘What Goes Around Comes Around: Derrida and Levinas on the Economy of the Gift and the Gift of Genealogy’, in Schrift, A. D. (ed.), The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comay, R. (2011), Mourning Sickness: Hegel and the French Revolution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coward, H. and Foshay, T. (eds.) (1992), Derrida and Negative Theology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Critchley, S. (1998), ‘A Commentary Upon Derrida’s Reading of Hegel in Glas’, in Barnett, S. (ed.), Hegel After Derrida. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1973) [1967], Speech and Phenomena, in Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, trans. D. B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976) [1967], Of Grammatology, trans. G. C. Spivak. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1978a) [1967], ‘From Restricted to General Economy: A Hegelianism without reserve’, in Writing and Difference, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1978b) [1967], ‘Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas’, in Writing and Difference, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1981), Positions, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1982a) [1971], ‘The Pit and the Pyramid: Introduction to Hegel’s Semiology’, in Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1982b) [1971], ‘Différance’, in Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1986) [1974], Glas, trans. J. P. Leavey, Jr. and R. Rand. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1987), ‘On Reading Heidegger: An Outline of Remarks to the Essex Colloquium’, Research in Phenomenology 17: .Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1989), ‘Biodegradables: Seven Diary Fragments’, trans. P. Kamuf. Critical Inquiry 15:4: .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. (1991) [1982], Cinders, trans. N. Lukacher. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1992) [1991], Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money, trans. P. Kamuf. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1995a) [1992], The Gift of Death, trans. D. Wills. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1995b) [1993], On the Name, ed. Dutoit, T., trans. D. Wood, J. P. Leavey, Jr. and I. McLeod. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1995c) [1992], ‘Between Brackets I’ in Points… Interviews, 1974–1994, ed. Weber, E., trans. P. Kamuf. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2003), The Work of Mourning, ed. Brault, P.-A. and Naas, M.. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2005) [1994], The Politics of Friendship, trans. G. Collins. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2006) [1993], Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, trans. P. Kamuf. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2008) [1987], ‘How to Avoid Speaking: Denials’, in Psyche: Inventions of the Other, Volume II, ed. Kamuf, P. and Rottenberg, E.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
di Giovanni, G. (2010), ‘Introduction’, in Hegel, G. W. F. (eds.), The Science of Logic, trans. G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Facioni, S. (2009), ‘Before and After Glas: Approximations to the Cognitio Vespertina’, in Baral, K. C. and Radhakrishnan, R. (eds.), Theory after Derrida: Essays in Critical Praxis. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaston, S. (2006), The Impossible Mourning of Jacques Derrida. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Genet, J. (1988) [1967], ‘What Remains of a Rembrandt Torn into Four Equal Pieces and Flushed Down the Toilet’, in Rembrandt, trans. B. Frechtman. Madras and New York: Hanuman Books.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. E. (2006), Neoplatonism after Derrida: Parallelograms. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. E. (2013), Being Different: More Neoplatonism After Derrida. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (1994), Plotinus. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2005), Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2017), From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2020), Platonism and Naturalism: The Possibility of Philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. (2005), Hegel und der spätantike Neuplatonismus: Untersuchungen zur Metaphysik des Einen und des Nous in Hegels spekulativer und geschichtlicher Deutung. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. (2019), ‘Hegel’s Programmatic Recourse to the Ancient Philosophy of Intellect’, in Gersh, S. (ed.), Plotinus’ Legacy: The Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1972), ‘Time and Being’, in Heidegger, M. (ed.), On Time and Being, trans. J. Stambaugh. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (1996), ‘Hegel, Derrida and Restricted Economy: The Case of Mechanical Memory’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 34:1: 79–93.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Kimhi, I. (2018), Thinking and Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krell, D. F. (2000), The Purest of Bastards: Works of Mourning, Art, and Affirmation in the Thought of Jacques Derrida. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, M. (2006), ‘The Uses of Reception: Derrida and the Historical Imperative’, in Martindale, C. and Thomas, R. F. (eds.), Classics and the Uses of Reception. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Malabou, C. (2001), ‘History and the process of mourning in Hegel and Freud’, Radical Philosophy 106: 15–20.Google Scholar
Marion, J-L. (2002) [1997], Being Given: Towards a Phenomenology of Givenness, trans. J. L. Kosky. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Marion, J-L. (2012) [1991], God without Being: Hors-Texte, trans. T. A. Carlson. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. (2009), ‘Absolute Mourning: It Is Jacques You Mourn For’, in Miller, J. H. (ed.), For Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. and Davidson, A. I. (eds.) (2007), The Late Derrida. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Naas, M. (1996), ‘The Time of a Detour: Jacques Derrida and the Question of the Gift’, Oxford Literary Review 18:1: 67–86.Google Scholar
Narbonne, J-M. (2001), Hénologie, ontologie et Ereignis (Plotin-Proclus-Heidegger). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ofrat, G. (2001), The Jewish Derrida, trans. P. Kidron. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Peeters, B. (2013), Derrida: A Biography, trans. A. Brown. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2018), Hegel’s Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in The Science of Logic. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Plato (1997), Republic, trans. G. M. A. Grube, rev. C. D. C. Reeve, in Plato: Complete Works, ed. Cooper, J. M. and Hutchinson, D. S.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plotinus (2018), The Enneads, ed. Gerson, L. P., trans. G. Boys-Stones, J. M. Dillon, L. P. Gerson, R. A. H. King, A. Smith and J. Wilberding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Proclus (1963), The Elements of Theology, trans. E. R. Dobbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1996), ‘The comedy of Hegel and the Trauerspiel of modern philosophy’, in Rose, G, (ed.) Mourning Becomes the Law: Philosophy and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2013), The Routledge Guidebook to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (2018), Hegel’s Interpretation of the Religions of the World: The Logic of the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ware, O. (2005), ‘Impossible Passions: Derrida and Negative Theology’, Philosophy Today 49:2: .Google Scholar
Zambrana, R. (2012), ‘Hegel’s logic of finitude’, Continental Philosophy Review 45: .CrossRefGoogle Scholar