Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T04:17:18.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health economics methods for public health resource allocation: a qualitative interview study of decision makers from an English local authority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2019

Emma Frew Open the ORCID record for Emma Frew [Opens in a new window]  and
Katie Breheny
Emma Frew*
Affiliation:
Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Katie Breheny
Affiliation:
Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Emma Frew, Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Email: e.frew@bham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Local authorities in England have responsibility for public health, however, in recent years, budgets have been drastically reduced placing decision makers under unprecedented financial pressure. Although health economics can offer support for decision making, there is limited evidence of it being used in practice. The aim of this study was to undertake in-depth qualitative research within one local authority to better understand the context for public health decision making; what, and how economics evidence is being used; and invite suggestions for how methods could be improved to better support local public health decision making. The study included both observational methods and in-depth interviews. Key meetings were observed and semi-structured interviews conducted with participants who had a decision-making role to explore views on economics, to understand the barriers to using evidence and to invite suggestions for improvements to methods. Despite all informants valuing the use of health economics, many barriers were cited: including a perception of a narrow focus on the health sector; lack of consideration of population impact; and problems with translating long timescales to short term impact. Methodological suggestions included the broadening of frameworks; increased use of natural experiments; and capturing wider non-health outcomes that resonate with the priorities of multiple stakeholders.

Keywords

economic evaluationpublic healthlocal decision-making
Type
Articles
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 128 - 140
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abou-Setta, AM, Jeyaraman, M, Attia, A, Al-Inany, HG, Ferri, M, Ansari, MT, Garritty, CM, Bond, K Norris, SL (2016) Methods for developing evidence reviews in short periods of time: a scoping review. PLOS One 11(12): e0165903.Google Scholar
Barnes, R, Holmes, B, Lindstrom, R, Trytten, C Wales, M (2015) Evidence-informed healthcare through integration of health research. Healthcare Management Forum 28(2): 75–78.Google Scholar
Coast, J (2017) Qualitative Methods for Health Economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Coast, J, Smith, R Lorgelly, P (2008) Should the capability approach be applied in Health Economics? Health Economics 17, 667–670.Google Scholar
Department of Health, UK Government (2012) The Public Health Outcomes Framework for England, 2013-2016. London.Google Scholar
Eddama, O Coast, J (2009) Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision making in England: a qualitative investigation. Health Policy 89(3): 261–270.Google Scholar
Hill, S, Vale, L, Hunter, DL, Henderson, E Oluboyede, Y (2017) Economic evaluations of alcohol prevention interventions: is evidence sufficient? A review of methodological challenges. Health Policy 121, 1249–1262.Google Scholar
Holmes, BJ, Best, A, Davies, H, Hunter, DL, Kelly, MP, Marshall, M Rycroft-Malone, J (2017) Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action. Evidence & Policy 13(3): 539–560.Google Scholar
Kelly, MP, McDaid, D, Ludbrook, K Powell, J (2015) Economic Appraisal of Public Health Interventions. London: NHS Health Development Agency.Google Scholar
The King’s Fund (2017) Big Cuts Planned to Public Health Budgets. London: The King’s Fund.Google Scholar
The King’s Fund (2015) Has the government delivered a new era for public health? in The King’s Fund Verdict on General Election 2015. London: The King’s Fund.Google Scholar
Lal, A, Moodie, M, Peeters, A Carter, R (2018) Inclusion of equity in economic analyses of public health policies: systematic review and future directions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 42(2): 207–213.Google Scholar
Lyons, M (2007) Place Shaping: A Shared Ambition for the Future of Local Government. Norwich: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Marks, L, Hunter, DL, Scalabrini, S, Gray, J, McCafferty, S, Payne, N, Peckham, S, Salway, S Thokala, P (2015) The return of public health to local government in England: changing the parameters of the public health prioritisation debate?. Public Health 129(9): 1194–1203.Google Scholar
McDonald, R (2002) Using Health Economics in Health Services: Rationing Irrationally? Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2012) Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance, 3rd edn, London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2014) Physical activity return on investment tool. https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/into-practice/return-on-investment-tools/physical-activity-return-on-investment-tool [September 2017].Google Scholar
Payne, K, McAllister, M Davies, LM (2012) Valuing the economic benefits of complex interventions when maximising health is not sufficient. Health Economics 22(3): 258–271.Google Scholar
Primary Care Trust Network (2008) Priority Setting: Strategic Planning. London: The NHS Confederation.Google Scholar
Round, J Paulden, M (2018) Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach. European Journal of Health Economics 19(4): 489–498.Google Scholar
Rutter, H, Savona, N, Glonti, K, Bibby, J, Cummins, S, Greaves, F, Harper, L, Hawe, P, Moore, L, Petticrew, M, Rehfuess, E, Shiell, A, Thomas, J White, M (2017) The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet 390(10112): 2602–2604.Google Scholar
Smith, R, Lorgelly, P, Al-Janabi, H, Venkatapuram, S Coast, J (2012) The capability approach: an alternative evaluation paradigm for health economics? In AM Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 415–424.Google Scholar
UK Government (2013) Policy Area. Public Health. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/topics/public-health. [22 September 2018].Google Scholar
Weatherly, H, Drummond, M, Claxton, K, Cookson, R, Ferguson, B, Godfrey, C, Rice, N, Sculpher, M Sowden, A (2009) Methods for assessing the cost effectiveness of public health interventions: key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy 93, 85–92.Google Scholar
White, P, Skirrow, H, George, A Memon, A (2018) A systematic review of economic evaluations of local authority commissioned preventative public health interventions in overweight and obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol and illicit drugs use and smoking cessation in United Kingdom. Journal of Public Health 40(4): e521–e530.Google Scholar
Williams, I Bryan, S (2007) Understanding the limited impact of economic evaluation in health care resource allocation: a conceptual framework. Health Policy 80, 135–143.Google Scholar
Williams, I Bryan, S (2015a) Lonely at the top and stuck in the middle? The ongoing challenge of using cost-effectiveness information in priority setting. International Journal of Health Policy & Planning 4(3): 185–187.Google Scholar
Williams, I Bryan, S (2015b) Using economic evaluation in priority setting: what do we know and what can we do? In E Neigel, M Laverer and V Schatzlein (eds), Legitimization and Framework of Prioritisation in Medicine: An International Dialogue, London: Springer, 27–42.Google Scholar
Williams, I, McIver, S, Moore, D Bryan, S (2008) Economic evaluation in NHS decision making: a review and empirical investigation. Health Technology Assessment 12(7): 1–175.Google Scholar