Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:24:21.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov., a new noeggerathialean species from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Portugal with new insights on the Noeggerathiales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2025

Pedro Correia Open the ORCID record for Pedro Correia [Opens in a new window]  and
Carlos A. Góis-Marques Open the ORCID record for Carlos A. Góis-Marques [Opens in a new window]
Pedro Correia*
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra, Geosciences Center, Department of Earth Sciences – Polo II, Rua Sílvio Lima, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal
Carlos A. Góis-Marques
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências da Vida, Universidade da Madeira, Madeira Botanical Group (GBM), Funchal, Portugal CIBIO, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade dos Açores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Vairão, Portugal Instituto Dom Luiz (IDL), Laboratório Associado, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
*
Corresponding author: Pedro Correia; Email: pedro.correia@dct.uc.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Noeggerathiales were until recently a group of plants with uncertain systematic position that existed in the Carboniferous and Permian times. Recent discoveries classify them as heterosporous progymnosperms. Despite the discovery of additional specimens, the group still remains highly artificial because their reproductive organs are rarely preserved in organic connection. Within the Carboniferous of Iberian Massif, the noeggerathialeans are poorly represented. Here, we describe Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. from the uppermost Carboniferous of Portugal. This is the second representative of Noeggerathiales reported in the Portuguese Carboniferous after Carlos Teixeira have described the noeggerathialean Rhacopteris gomesiana in the 1940s from Douro Carboniferous Basin (Stephanian C/lower Gzhelian, Upper Pennsylvanian). Palaeopteridium andrenelii was found in upper Asturian (upper Moscovian, Middle Pennsylvanian) strata from the classical Westphalian outcrops of Ervedosa, located in the region of Alto da Serra (Fânzeres), Gondomar, in northwestern Portugal. Two reproductive structures are associated with the frond of the new fossil species. Although not organically linked, both structures could belong to parent plant (frond) and represent possible detached macrosporangia. This reenforces the Palaeopteridium as a noeggerathialean and the first reproductive structures found for this genus.

Keywords

PalaeopteridiumNoeggerathialesmacrosporangiaErvedosa floraupper Asturian (upper Moscovian; Middle Pennsylvanian)GondomarPortugal
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 162 , 2025 , e1
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

The Noeggerathiales is a puzzling extinct group of late Palaeozoic plants known by fossils of foliage associated/disassociated with strobilli, isolated strobilous or isolated foliage (e.g. Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhang, Bek and Pfefferkorn2004, Reference Wang, Pfefferkorn and Bek2009; Pfefferkorn & Wang, Reference Pfefferkorn and Wang2016). Due to a lack of anatomically preserved specimens, these plants until recently had an uncertain systematic position, being historically considered as related to ferns, cycads, sphenopsids or to progymnosperms (e.g. Leary, Reference Leary1980; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhang, Bek and Pfefferkorn2004; Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Taylor and Krings2009). Recently, the finding and description of whole specimens found within a Permian ash-tuff with articulated foliage, (pseudo-like)strobili and stem with anatomical preservation, allowed the elucidation of the Noeggerathiales as members of the progymnosperms clade, a sister group to the seed plants (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Hilton, Pfefferkorn, Wang, Zhang, Bek, Pšenička, Seyfullah and Dilcher2021; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Wang and Wang2023).

Palaeobiogeographically, the Noeggerathiales are restricted to two floral realms, the Cathaysian floral realm (i.e. China) where these plant fossils are relatively abundant and in the Euramerican floral realm where these are considered rare (Pfefferkorn & Wang, Reference Pfefferkorn and Wang2016). As pointed by some authors (Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977; Pfefferkorn & Wang, Reference Pfefferkorn and Wang2016) despite extensive exploration and description of several palaeofloras, noeggerathialean fossils are seldom found in Euramerica Palaeozoic floras. This bias is most probably due to their palaeoecological preferences to extra-basinal ecosystems or specific edaphic/nutrient conditions (but see Pfefferkorn & Wang, Reference Pfefferkorn and Wang2016). Despite its rarity, within Iberian Peninsula, at least ten noeggerathialean taxa were recognized mainly in Carboniferous basins from Spain: Palaeopteridium reussii (Ettingshausen) Kinston, Palaeopteridium michiganense (Arnold) Álvarez-Vázquez, cf. Saaropteris guthoerlii Hirmer, Rhacopteris bipinnata Němejc, Rhacopteris elegans (Ettinghausen) Kidston, Rhacopteris cf. robusta Kidston, cf. Rhacopteris paniculifera Stur, Rhacopteris inaequilatera Göppert, cf. Rhacopteris dichotoma Kidston; in Portugal, only one record is known, Rhacopteris gomesiana Teixeira (Teixeira, Reference Teixeira1943; Wagner, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Wagner & Álvarez-Vázquez, Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Sá and Flores2018). However, this number can be reduced to four, as the fossil taxa Rhacopteris is possibly not a noeggerathialean (see Pfefferkorn & Wang, Reference Pfefferkorn and Wang2016).

In recent years, efforts were made to identify old and new fossiliferous outcrops and to collect and describe the palaeobiodiversity of the Portuguese Carboniferous basins. These resulted in the description of several new fossil plant taxa, many endemics to the Portuguese territory (see Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Pšenička, Sá, Domingos, Carneiro and Flores2014 a; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Sá, Murphy, Šimůnek and Flores2016; Pšenička et al. Reference Pšenička, Correia, Šimůnek, Sá, Murphy and Flores2017; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Sá and Flores2018; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Cleal and Sá2019; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Bashforth, Šimůnek, Cleal, Sá and Labandeira2020; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek and Sá2021 a; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Cleal, Vallois, Domingos and Sa2021 b; Barbosa et al. Reference Barbosa, Correia, Muchagata, Domingos and Sá2022; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Barbosa, Šimůnek, Muchagata and Sá2023 a; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Pereira, Šimůnek and Cleal2023 b). Despite this effort, since the 1940s, no new noeggerathialean fossils from Portugal were described.

In this paper, we describe and illustrate a new noeggerathialean species of the fossil-genus Palaeopteridium and dissociated reproductive structures possibly related to macrosporangia for the uppermost Carboniferous of Portugal and discuss its implications for the palaeoecology and palaeodiversity of Noeggerathiales.

2. Material and methods

2.a. Fossil locality and material

The fossil material of the new noeggerathialean species was collected in an excavation during fieldwork in 2006, in upper Westphalian D (upper Asturian/upper Moscovian, Middle Pennsylvanian) outcrops of Tanjarro locality, found along the roadside of Dom Miguel (known as ‘Estrada Dom Miguel’), located around Seixo (Fânzeres) region, in Gondomar, northwestern Portugal (Fig. 1). This locality of late Westphalian D plants has been described as an integral part of the Ervedosa flora (Teixeira, Reference Teixeira1944). The outcrops of ‘Estrada Dom Miguel’ fossil site represent a narrow geological-stratigraphic strip that contains a diverse and well-preserved fossil macroflora. This narrow strip occurs on the geographical alignment of the classical Westphalian outcrops of Ervedosa, which also include the localities of Montalto and Tanjarro.

Figure 1. Locality map of the Ervedosa’s (Estrada Dom Miguel) fossil site. Modified from Correia et al. (Reference Correia, Bashforth, Šimůnek, Cleal, Sá and Labandeira2020, Fig. 1).

The palaeobotanical material (Plates I−II) consists of a single specimen (holotype) which is also represented by a counterpart (isotype). Both plant fossil samples are preserved as adpressions (compressions and impressions; Shute & Cleal, Reference Shute and Cleal1986) in laminated grey shales.

Plate I. Holotype MGUTAD-1121 of Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. from the Ervedosa’s outcrops (upper Westphalian D/upper Asturian, Middle Pennsylvanian) of the road Dom Miguel, Seixo (Fânzeres) region, Gondomar, northwestern Portugal. 1 – General view of the holotype (white arrows indicate a very developed petiole-like, a possible penultimate rachis). 2–3 – Enlargement of rectangular boxes in Figure 1, showing details of foliage (white arrows indicate the petiolate attachment of the pinnules on an ultimate rachis). 4 – Enlargement of rectangular box in Figure 1, displaying a putative ‘noeggerathialean’ macrosporangium with a probable micropyle (highlighted in dashed white circle). 5 – Putative ‘noeggerathialean’ macrosporangium, exhibiting a multicelled gametophyte extending from ruptured spore wall (white arrows) (holotype counterpart; see Plate II, 2B).

Plate II. Counterpart (isotype MGUTAD-1122) of the holotype specimen of Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. 1 – Highlight of partially preserved foliage and venation of the frond, displaying highlighting an associated ‘noeggerathialean’ macrosporangium-like and an oval-shaped structure of undetermined (highlighted in rectangular boxes). 2 – Interpretive line drawing of the frond foliage and venation (A), macrosporangia showing a multicelled gametophyte extending from ruptured spore wall (B), and unknown plant fragment (C) (enlargement of rectangular boxes in Figure 1).

2.b. Sample preparation and repository

The fossils of the new species were prepared either manually, using small chisels, hammers and stiff needles, or mechanically with a compressed air and an electrically powered vibro-tool. The specimens were later drawn using a camera lucida setup attached to a stereomicroscope to elucidate the morphology and help with the taxonomic description in Systematics part. Both part and counterpart are stored in the palaeontological collections of the Geological Museum Fernando Real of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (MGUTAD; Vila Real, Portugal).

3. Geological, palaeobotanical and biostratigraphic background

The Ervedosa flora occurs in upper Westphalian D (upper Asturian/upper Moscovian, Middle Pennsylvanian) strata in a separate thrust slice, into two thin strips which surroundings to the NE lower Gzhelian (Upper Pennsylvanian) rocks of Douro Carboniferous Basin (e.g. Teixeira, Reference Teixeira1944; Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner and Lemos de Sousa1982 a; Wagner, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Wagner & Álvarez-Vázquez, Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010). In the geological-structural and sedimentological context, Ervedosa has a genesis not very different from the Douro Carboniferous Basin (Pinto de Jesus, Reference Pinto de Jesus2001, Reference Pinto de Jesus2003).

The first studies on the Ervedosa (Westphalian D) flora date back to the 1940s and 1950s, with works by Teixeira (Reference Teixeira1941, Reference Teixeira1942 a, Reference Teixeira1942 b, Reference Teixeira1942 c, Reference Teixeira1943, Reference Teixeira1944, Reference Teixeira1945, Reference Teixeira1951, Reference Teixeira1954) that make reference to a set of plant fossils harvested by this author in the localities of Ervedosa, Tanjarro and Montalto (Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983). The original materials are stored in the collections of the Geological Surveys of Portugal in Lisbon and at the Museu de História Natural e da Ciência da Universidade do Porto (MHNCUP; Portugal). The lists initially published by Teixeira (Reference Teixeira1943, Reference Teixeira1944, Reference Teixeira1945, Reference Teixeira1954) for the Ervedosa flora were commented by Wagner (1959, p. 405), and afterwards, revised by Wagner (Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983, p. 156) and Wagner & Lemos de Sousa (Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983, p. 132).

The stratigraphic age of the Ervedosa flora was first discussed by Laveine et al. (Reference Laveine, Coquel and Loboziak1977), making reference to the early-late Westphalian D (Asturian) age with the comparison between the Callipteridium (Praecallipteridium) jongmansii (Bertrand) Wagner and Callipteridium (Praecallipteridium) armasii (Zeiller) Wagner biozones from the Santa Susana Basin (upper Westphalian D) of the Portuguese Carboniferous and Asturian Central Massif in northwestern Spain, respectively (e.g. Wagner, Reference Wagner1966, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Cleal and Sá2019). Wagner (Reference Wagner1971) recorded Callipteridium jongmansii under name of Callipteridium armasii (see also Laveine et al. Reference Laveine, Coquel and Loboziak1977; Wagner, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983). This author later described both species as a single group, grouped into a ‘Callipteridium jongmansii-armasii’ complex, which appears in ages from late Westphalian to mid-to-late Cantabrian (Wagner, Reference Wagner, Sutherland and Manger1984, see chart 3). More recently, Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez (Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010) described Callipteridium jongmansii as only species which appears in the upper Asturian (upper Westphalian D) of Santa Susana Basin and Ervedosa (Portugal) and in the lower Asturian (lower Westphalian D) and lower? Cantabrian of Spain.

Also, in the Laveine (Reference Laveine, Holub and Wagner1977)’s work, there is the reference to the Dicksoniites plueckenetii Sterzel as equivalent to the late Westphalian D age, and in correspondence with the South Wales horizon (Cleal, Reference Cleal1978). However, D. plueckenetii has been recorded in the Carboniferous of Iberian Peninsula (Iberia) in ages from Westphalian D to Stephanian C (early Gzhelian) (e.g. Wagner, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983, Reference Wagner, Sutherland and Manger1984; see also Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Sá and Flores2018, Table 1). Other macrofloral elements present, Alethopteris corsinii Buisine is a species that occurs in the Westphalian C and Westphalian D horizons/units of the northeastern France (Buisine, Reference Buisine1961), and the species Linopteris obliqua (Bunbury) Zeiller and cf. Lobatopteris vestita (Lesquerex) Wagner, two biozones which are correspond to the lower and upper units of the Asturian substage of Western European regional scale (equivalent to the middle Westphalian D and upper Westphalian D units, according to Heckel & Clayton, Reference Heckel and Clayton2006), respectively (e.g. Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Wagner, Reference Wagner, Sutherland and Manger1984; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Šimůnek, Sá and Flores2018, Figure 10). Asterotheca cf. nyranensis Nĕmejc reported in the Ervedosa flora is an another Asturian (Westphalian D) floral record, which is associated with the obliqua and vestita Zones (macrofloral zones) in the floral massifs of Spain and Czech Republic (e.g. Pšenička et al. Reference Pšenička, Zodrow, Mastalerz and Bek2005; Wagner & Álvarez-Vázquez, Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010, pp. 270, 273). In Portugal, this species has been reported in upper Westphalian D (upper Asturian) strata of the Santa Susana Basin (e.g. Wagner, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983).

Table 1. Summary of the main characteristics of foliage for comparison between Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. and other similar noeggerathialean fossil taxa

Ervedosa flora is also characterized by the presence of some native or endemic species, such as Linopteris florini Teixeira and Neuropteris (Mixoneura) ervedosensis Teixeira described by Teixeira (Reference Teixeira1941, Reference Teixeira1944, 1Reference Teixeira942 a; Reference Teixeira1942 c; see also Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner and Lemos de Sousa1982 a; Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner and Lemos de Sousa1982 b; Wagner, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983). L. florini is a long ranging form, which is generally mid-Westphalian (Westphalian B) and early Stephanian (late Cantabrian/early Barruelian), and has been found in Portugal, Spain and Germany (Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner and Lemos de Sousa1982 a; Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner and Lemos de Sousa1982 b; Wagner, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983). N. ervedosensis has been later redescribed by Teixeira (Reference Teixeira1944) as a probable form of Neuropteris ovata Hoffmann, Neuropteris ovata Hoffmann forma ervedosensis Teixeira. It is noted that according to Wagner and Lemos de Sousa (Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983), Neuropteris ovata forma ervedosensis is a species in its own rights and probably unrelated to Neuropteris ovata. Other floral elements such as Lobatopteris micromiltonii (P. Bertrand) Wagner and Macroneuropteris scheuchzeri (Hoffmann) Cleal, Shute & Zodrow compose the Ervedosa flora, which tend to suggest mid-Westphalian D (Asturian) to late Cantabrian (early Stephanian) ages attributed to the floral massifs of Iberian Peninsula (e.g. Wagner & Lemos de Sousa, Reference Wagner, Lemos de Sousa, Lemos de Sousa and Oliveira1983; Wagner, Reference Wagner, Sutherland and Manger1984; Wagner & Álvarez-Vázquez, Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010, see comments in p. 276). These latter species suggest a higher age than that previously established, for a Cantabrian age, but the set of species above-mentioned places flora of Ervedosa with age most likely to the late Westphalian D.

4. Systematic description

The taxonomic classification system is according to Taylor et al. (Reference Taylor, Taylor and Krings2009) and Novikoff and Barabasz-Krasny (Reference Novikoff, Barabasz-Krasny, Novikoff and Barabasz-Krasny2015).

Division: †Progymnospermophyta Bold et al.

Class: †Noeggerathiopsida Kryshtofovich

Order: †Noeggerathiales Nĕmejc emend. Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Hilton, Pfefferkorn, Wang, Zhang, Bek, Pšenička, Seyfullah and Dilcher2021)

Fossil-family: Discinitaceae Zhifeng & Thomas

Fossil-genus: Palaeopteridium Kidston (Reference Kidston1923)

Type species: Palaeopteridium reussii (Ettingshausen) Kidston (Reference Kidston1923) from Westphalian Series of the Carboniferous Rocks of Great Britain.

Basionym: Asplenites reussii Ettingshausen (Reference Ettingshausen1852), ‘Steinkohlenflora von Stradonitz in Böhmen’, Ablandl. K.K. geol. Reichsanst., Band I, Abth. 3, No. 4, p. 16, pl. I, Figures 8, 9 (Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, p. 201)

Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov.

(Plates I, 1–3; Plate II, 1)

Etymology. The specific name ‘andrenelii’ honours André Nel from Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris), a world expert in palaeoentomology and honourable colleague who has been cooperating with us on the systematic study of new insect fossils recently described in the Douro and Buçaco Basins (Loureiro et al. Reference Loureiro, Correia, Nel and Pinto de Jesus2010; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Nel, Sá, Domingos, Carneiro and Flores2014 b; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Schubnel and Nel2021 c; Correia & Nel, Reference Correia and Nel2023; Correia et al. Reference Correia, Pereira, Cavaleiro, Correia, Sá and Nel2023 c).

Holotype. Specimen MGUTAD-1121 (Plate I, 1−3) is composed of a counterpart – isotype MGUTAD-1122 (Plate II, 1).

Type locality. Outcrops located in the northeast banks of road Dom Miguel, Seixo (Fânzeres) region, Gondomar, northwestern Portugal (Fig. 1).

Type horizon and age. Horizon composed of laminated and compact grey shales; late Westphalian D (late Asturian/late Moscovian, Middle Pennsylvanian).

Diagnosis. Bipinnate frond with subopposite or alternate pinnules, relatively symmetrical and spaced, sometimes touching or slightly overlapping, obliquely attached to an ultimate rachis by a very narrow base (1.5–2.0 mm long and 0.8–1.0 mm wide) − petiolate attachment. Ultimate rachis very thin, straight or slightly flexuous, detached from a possible penultimate rachis. Fan-shaped (flabelliform or semiflabelliform type) pinnules, of 7–8 mm long and a maximum fan width of about 5−6 mm, with entire lateral and crenate/lobed distal margins. Distal margins bearing irregular and asymmetrical 12−14 crenate-shaped teeth/lobes of about 0.3−1.0 mm long. Venation pattern of open dichotomous showing a single vein entering each pinnule, giving rise to a series of radiating veinlets of equal strength which in their course to the margin divide three or four times. There are 14–20 veins on distal margin of pinnule.

Description of the holotype. The frond is at least up to 37 mm long, with subopposite or alternate pinnules, relatively symmetrical and spaced, sometimes touching or slightly overlapping (Plate I, 3), and obliquely attached on an ultimate (last order) rachis by a very narrow base (1.5–2.0 mm long and 0.8–1.0 wide) − petiolate attachment (Plate I, 2, 3, white arrows; Plate II, 2A). The ultimate rachis is very thin, of 0.2−0.5 mm wide, which is detached from a possible penultimate rachis (petiole-like) up to 15 mm long and 1.0−1.5 mm wide (Plate I, 1, white arrows). The petiole displays a prominent central vein. The pinnules are 7–8 mm long and 5−6 mm wide and fan-shaped (flabelliform or semiflabelliform type), having entire lateral and crenate/lobed distal margins. The crenate/lobed margins have 12−14 crenate-shaped teeth/lobes, relatively irregular and asymmetrical, of about 0.3−1.0 mm long. The venation is dichotomous displaying veinlets of equal strength, well visible, and which in their course to the margin are divided in three to four times (Plate II, 1, 2). The veins are very few in number − there are 14–20 veins on distal margin of pinnule.

Remarks. Some upper pinnules of the frond appear to display slightly cleft or slotted distal margins (see Plate I, 2), but it is likely this is damage on the pinnule lamina due to the taphonomy (see holotype counterpart and restoration of foliage in Plate II, 1, 2A).

5. Discussion

5.a. Comparisons

In comparison with other noeggerathialean species, Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. (Plates I, 1–3; Plate II, 1) bears a close resemblance to Palaeopteridium reussii (Ettingshausen) Kidston, Reference Kidston1923. This species occurs in the Duckmantian and Bolsovian (Westphalian B, C) of Bohemia (Czech Republic), lower Asturian of Spain and Westphalian Series of South Staffordshire Coalfield (Britain) and Namurian (Serpukhovian−Bashkirian) from West-Central of Illinois (USA) (Kidston, Reference Kidston1923; Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977; Wagner & Álvarez-Vázquez, Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010). P. reussii bears semiflabelliform to flabelliform (fan-shaped) pinnules with dentate distal margins in which, showing 10−20 dentate-teeth and having 10 to 20 veins which are divided up to three times (e.g. Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, pp. 201, 202, pl. LV; Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977, p. 16−19, Figure 7A−C, pl. 4, Figures 1−5; Wagner & Álvarez-Vázquez, Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010, p. 274, pl. XVII, Figures 5, 6). The major difference between P. reussii and P. andrenelii sp. nov. is in the form of the distal margins of the pinnules. The distal pinnule margins of P. reussii are notably dentate to serrate (e.g. Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, pl. LV, Figure 2a; Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977, Figure 7A−C; Leary & Trask, Reference Leary and Trask1985, pl. 4, Figure 1), while those of P. andrenelii sp. nov. are relatively crenate or lobed (Plate II, 2). Other differences occur in the lower and upper parts of the pinnules. The pinnules of P. reussii have an apex shape more circular, while pinnules of P. andrenelii sp. nov. show irregular distal margins. On the other hand, the pinnules of the Portuguese species shows a more petiolate attachment (Plate II, 1, 2) when compared to the pinnule attachment of P. reussii pinnules which is stronger and shorter or less developed and, sometimes, it is highlighted by the absence of a petiole (e.g. Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, pl. LV; Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977, Figure 7A−C; pl. 4, Figures 1−5; Wagner & Álvarez-Vázquez, Reference Wagner and Álvarez-Vázquez2010, pl. XVII, Figures 5, 6; see summary of the main characteristics of foliage for comparison in Table 1).

P. andrenelii sp. nov. shares with Rhacopteris lindseaeformis Bunbury sp. (= Rhacopteris [Anisopteris] paniculifera Stur, Reference Stur1875) the semiflabelliform-flabelliform pinnule shape with crenulate distal margin, but it differs from the latter in the symmetry of pinnules. The pinnules of R. lindseaeformis are notably asymmetrical, having one of lateral margins more developed and distal margins cleft into segments (Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, pp. 204, 205, text-Figure 9, pl. XLIX, Figures 1−4, pl. LI, Figure 2; Boureau & Doubinger, Reference Boureau and Doubinger1975, pp. 624, 627, Figures 530, 534; Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Taylor and Krings2009, pp. 555, 562, Figure 14.79). In addition, P. andrenelii sp. nov. differs from R. lindseaeformis in the venation pattern. R. lindseaeformis pinnules show radiating veinlets of equal strength which, in their course to the pinnule margin, are divided two or three times. In contrast, the pinnules of P. andrenelii sp. nov. display veinlets of equal strength, well visible, and which in their course to the margin are divided in three to four times (Plate II, 1, 2; see Table 1). R. lindseaeformis is described from the Carboniferous Limestone Series and is there restricted to the Lower Limestone Group but is widely distributed in the Oil-Shale Group of the Carciferous Series (Mississippian) of Britain (Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, p. 207; Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Taylor and Krings2009, pp. 555, 562).

P. andrenelii sp. nov. also is comparable to the Rhacopteris inaequilatera (Göppert) Stur, Reference Stur1875 (= Anisopteris inaequilatera Göppert) which has semiflabelliform to flabelliform (fan-shaped) pinnules with finely crenulate distal margins. Nevertheless, P. andrenelii sp. nov. differs from R. inaequilatera in the apex shape of pinnules. R. inaequilatera pinnules show notably truncate-shaped apices (Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, p. 208, pl. XLIX, Figures 5, 6, pl. LI, Figure 3; see also Boureau & Doubinger, Reference Boureau and Doubinger1975, p. 621, Figure 528). There is also some dissimilarity in the venation pattern between two species. In R. inaequilatera, the veins dichotomize two or three times when they reach the pinnule margin (detailed description in Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, p. 208), while those of P. andrenelii sp. nov. are divided in three to four times (Plate II, 1, 2; see Table 1). R. inaequilatera occurs in lower Carboniferous/Mississippian (Calciferous Sandstone Series – Oil-Shale Group) of Britain (Kidston, Reference Kidston1923; Boureau & Doubinger, Reference Boureau and Doubinger1975).

5.b. Generic placement

The new fossil species described herein (Plates I, 1–3; Plate II, 1) shares macro-morphological features with Palaeopteridium Kidston, Reference Kidston1923 and Rhacopteris Schimper, Reference Schimper1869. Rhacopteris, similarly as Palaeopteridium belongs to the noeggerathialeans. Both fossil-genera are typical floristic elements of the Euramerican floral realm and bear very similar morphological traits in the pinnule general shape, bearing semiflabelliform to flabelliform (fan-shaped) pinnules, of which are compared favourably with the new Portuguese species. However, Palaeopteridium and Rhacopteris differ in the apical margin of pinnules. Rhacopteris has usually more divided pinnules (i.e. strongly slotted leaflets) than Palaeopteridium (e.g. Kidston, Reference Kidston1923; Boureau & Doubinger, Reference Boureau and Doubinger1975) [some species with non-slotted leaflets, such as ‘Rhacopteris circularis’ Walton, 1926 (see Boureau & Doubinger, Reference Boureau and Doubinger1975, p. 622), have been classified as belonging to the genus Rhacopteris; however, this taxonomic misunderstanding needs to be revised and the species should be transferred to the genus Palaeopteridium]. Palaeopteridium has usually only teeth in distal pinnule margin (e.g. Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977; Pfefferkorn & Wang, Reference Pfefferkorn and Wang2016, Figure 4). The pinnules of the new Portuguese species are not slotted, having dentate or lobed distal margins (Plate I, 2, 3; Plate II, 2A).

Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. also shares some basic features (fan-shaped pinnules) with the fossil-genera Anisopteris (Oberste-Brink) Hirmer, Reference Hirmer, Hirmer and Gothan1940 (see Boureau & Doubinger, Reference Boureau and Doubinger1975, p. 621) and Nothorhacopteris Archangelsky, Reference Archangelsky1983 (see Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Taylor and Krings2009, pp. 651, 677). Anisopteris belongs to quite different group [all the ‘Anisopteris’ species described in literature are different by stratigraphy and by systematic classification and the legitimacy of genus as valid name is questionable (various species classified to the genus Anisopteris were previously attributed to the genus Rhacopteris; see Kidston, Reference Kidston1923, pp. 203−9; Boureau & Doubinger, Reference Boureau and Doubinger1975, pp. 623−7)]. The South American Carboniferous−early Permian Nothorhacopteris is of a different floristic province, and it belongs to different taxonomic group (Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Taylor and Krings2009, p. 677).

Therefore, on the basis of these generic diagnostic morphological features and the phytogeographical differences, the new Portuguese species fits well into the fossil-genus Palaeopteridium.

5.c. Reproductive structures associated with Palaeopteridium-type fronds and its parental relationship

Leary (Reference Leary1980) described a specimen of Lacoea Read (Reference Read1946), a spore- or pollen-bearing organ (sporophyll type) with affinities to early gymnosperms (progymnosperms), from the Lower Pennsylvanian deposits of Rock Island County, Illinois (USA). The Leary’s specimen is found closely associated with Archaeopteris-like foliage known as Palaeopteridium, which has previously been suggested as the foliage of the Lacoea-bearing parent plant (Leary, Reference Leary1980). Lacoea has been compared with Discinites, one of the several fossil-genera of fructifications described by Leary (Reference Leary1973) (see also Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977, p. 16). Discinites was established by K. Feistmantel (Reference Feistmantel1879) and revised by Bek and Šimůnek (Reference Bek and Šimůnek2005). Feistmantel (Reference Feistmantel1879) believed that Discinites showed affinity to sphenopsids (see also Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhang, Bek and Pfefferkorn2004, p. 243). Nĕmejc (Reference Nĕmejc1937, Reference Nĕmejc1941) added several fossil species to the genus and found that these strobili appear together with fronds of Palaeopteridium and Rhacopteris. Several other authors (Nĕmejc, Reference Nĕmejc1937, Reference Nĕmejc1950; Hirmer, Reference Hirmer, Hirmer and Gothan1940; Zimmermann, Reference Zimmermann1959; Leary & Pfefferkorn, Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977; Remy & Remy, Reference Remy and Remy1977; Meyen, Reference Meyen1987; Gao & Thomas, Reference Gao and Thomas1994; Wang & Shen, Reference Wang and Shen2000) referred Discinites to noeggerathialean plants (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhang, Bek and Pfefferkorn2004). Leary & Pfefferkorn (Reference Leary and Pfefferkorn1977) included a tentative suggestion of a possible evolutionary sequence from an Archaeopteris-like form through forms similar to Noeggerathiales and Lacoea to Discinites (Leary, Reference Leary1980). Wang (Reference Wang2000) described Discinites sinensis as the first noeggerathialean strobilus that has been found as a petrifaction from the Permian of Shizuishan, Ningxia (China), yielding information on the structure of the Discinites spores. Bek (Reference Bek2001) and Bek and Šimůnek (Reference Bek and Šimůnek2005) provided a new knowledge about the morphology and phylogeny of Discinites spores based on adpression materials (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhang, Bek and Pfefferkorn2004). In both cases, the reproductive structures were found not to be biologically connected to frond, which is why it is not possible to conclude which of the examples represents a clear affinity. Perhaps even more interesting, both Lacoea and Discinites produce Calamospora-type spores (see Leary, Reference Leary1980; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhang, Bek and Pfefferkorn2004, Table 2). This last fact means that these reproductive structures may actually have belonged to the same noeggerathialean parent plant.

In the new noeggerathialean fossil described here, two very small reproductive structures are in close association with the frond fragment (Plate I, 4, 5; Plate II, 1, 2). They have lengths of about 4 to 5 mm and a width of about 2−3 mm. These structures most likely correspond to macrosporangia. One of the ‘macrosporangia’ shows a multicelled gametophyte extending from ruptured spore wall (Plate I, 5, white arrows; Plate II, 2B). Although not organically linked, both structures could belong to parent plant (noeggerathialean frond) described above. However, better preserved and articulated specimens are necessary to confirm the identity of these structures.

6. Biostratigraphic and palaeoecological considerations

A diverse macroflora was found together with Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov., which is composed of several groups of plants, consisting in a different rate of marattialean ferns (e.g. Asterotheca, Acitheca, Cyathocarpus, Lobatopteris), sphenopsids (e.g. Sphenophyllum, Annularia, Calamites, Asterophyllites, Calamostachys), pteridosperms (e.g. Linopteris, Callipteridium, Neuropteris, Odontopteris, Macroneuropteris, Sphenopteris), cordaitopsids (Cordaites), and ginkgoopsids (Dicranophyllum). The presence of species stratigraphically important such as Sphenophyllum cf. majus Bronn (cf. Sphenophyllum emarginatum (Brongniart) Koenig, Macroneuropteris scheuchzeri (Hoffmann) Cleal, Shute & Zodrow, Neuropteris cf. flexuosa Sternberg (cf. Neuropteris machadicostai Teixeira), and Callipteridium jongmansii (Bertrand) Wagner confirms the late Westphalian D/Cantabrian age previously established to the Ervedosa flora.

From a palaeoecological point of view, the dominance of taxa of pteridopsids (ferns), sphenopsids, and pteridosperms indicate that the resident floras were essentially composed by mesophytes to hygrophytes, of which grown in clastic wetlands during intervals of moist subhumid climate. This scenario is also based on the absence or rarity of ‘walchian’ conifers and other derived taxa (primarily gymnosperms) typical of dry subhumid and semiarid climate regimes (see in Bashforth et al. Reference Bashforth, Dimichele, Eble, Falcon-Lang, Looy and Lucas2021, Table 1, the segregation of habitats, floral types, and main plant groups that existed in tropical Euramerican Pangaea during the Pennsylvanian, according to seasonality of precipitation and climate).

7. Conclusions

This study describes a new noeggerathialean species, Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov., based on adpression (compressions-impressions) fossils from the classical Westphalian outcrops of Ervedosa (Gondomar), in northwestern Portugal. This new endemic species is the first record of the fossil-genus Palaeopteridium in the Portuguese Carboniferous. Putative reproductive structures, possibly isolated macrosporangia, found in close association with the frond fragment, might also represent the first record of these structures for this genus.

Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. has palaeoecological affinities with the noeggerathialean genus Rhacopteris, with which shared the same clastic wetland environments in Ervedosa, in western Iberia, during intervals of moist subhumid climate in the late Moscovian (Middle Pennsylvanian).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped improve the submitted manuscript. This study was supported by Portuguese funds by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (Portugal) in the frame of the UIDB/00073/2020 (DOI 10.54499/UIDB/00073/2020; https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00073/2020), UIDP/00073/2020 project of the I&D unit Geosciences Center (CGeo). CAG-M would like to acknowledge financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) Individual Call to Scientific Employment Stimulus contract number 2022.00017.CEECIND/CP1730/CT0001 (https://doi.org/10.54499/2022.00017.CEECIND/CP1730/CT0001) and the project UIDB/50027/2020.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known conflicts of interest.

References

Archangelsky, S (1983) Nothorhacopteris, a new generic name for some Carboniferous monopinnate fronds of Gondwanaland (= Rhacopteris ovata Auct. and Pseudorhacopteris Rigby, 1973). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 38, 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, C, Correia, P, Muchagata, J, Domingos, R and Sá, AA (2022) Phyllotheca douroensis sp. nov., a new equisetalean fossil-species from the Douro Carboniferous Basin (Upper Pennsylvanian; NW Portugal): palaeobiogeographical, systematic and evolutionary implications. Biosis: Biological Systems 3, e001.Google Scholar
Bashforth, AR, Dimichele, WA, Eble, CF, Falcon-Lang, HJ, Looy, CV and Lucas, SG (2021) The environmental implications of upper Paleozoic plant-fossil assemblages with mixtures of wetland and drought-tolerant taxa in tropical Pangea. Geobios 68, 1−45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bek, J (2001) Discinites spores: An example of unusual variation. First Meeting of the CIMP Spores and Pollen Subcommission, National University of Ireland, Cork, 2–7 September, 2001, p. 11.Google Scholar
Bek, J and Šimůnek, Z (2005) Revision of the cone genus Discinites from the Bohemian Carboniferous continental basins of Bohemia. Palaeontology 48, 1377–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boureau, ÉD and Doubinger, J (1975) Traité de paléobotanique IV (2): Pteridophylla (première partie). Paris: Masson et Cie Editeurs, 768 pp.Google Scholar
Buisine, M (1961) Études géologiques pour l’Atlas de topographie souterraine publiées par le Service Géologique des HBNPC. I. Flore fossile. 4.e Fasc. — Contribution à l’étude de la flore du terrain houiller. Les Aléthoptéridées du Nord de la France. 2 Vol. Houllères du Bassin du Nord et du Pas-de-Calais. Lille.Google Scholar
Cleal, CJ (1978) Floral biostratigraphy of the upper Silean Pennant Measures of South Wales. Geological Journal 13, 165–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Barbosa, C, Šimůnek, Z, Muchagata, J and Sá, AA (2023a) A new species of Lesleya (Spermatopsida) from the Carboniferous of Iberia and its palaeoecological and evolutionary significance. Historical Biology 35, 185−96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Bashforth, AR, Šimůnek, Z, Cleal, CJ, Sá, AA and Labandeira, CC (2020) The history of herbivory on sphenophytes: a new calamitalean with an insect gall from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Portugal and a review of arthropod herbivory on an ancient lineage. International Journal of Plant Sciences 181, 387–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P and Nel, A (2023) Increasing the palaeoentomological diversity in Portugal: a new and rare record of Oedischiidae (Orthoptera) from the Pennsylvanian of Douro Basin. Historical Biology 35, 838−42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Nel, A, Sá, AA Domingos, R, Carneiro, A and Flores, D (2014b) A new Palaeodictyoptera from the late carboniferous of Portugal. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (n.s.) 49, 398–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Pereira, S, Cavaleiro, M, Correia, M, Sá, AA and Nel, A (2023c) The first poroblattinid roachoid from the uppermost Carboniferous of Portugal. Historical Biology 35, 242−8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Pereira, S, Šimůnek, Z and Cleal, CJ (2023b) Florinanthus bussacensis sp. nov., a new cordaitalean cone from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Portugal. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 316, 104942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Sá, AA, Murphy, JB, Šimůnek, Z and Flores, D (2016) Lesleya Lesquereux from the Pennsylvanian of the Iberian Massif: part of a dryland megaflora from the Variscan orogen, northwestern Portugal. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 53, 883−95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Schubnel, T and Nel, A (2021c) What is the roachoid genus Eneriblatta (Dictyoptera: Phyloblattidae) from the Carboniferous of Portugal. Historical Biology 33, 777−82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Šimůnek, Z, Cleal, CJ and Sá, AA (2019) Douropteris alvarezii gen. nov., sp. nov., a new medullosalean pteridosperm genus from the early Gzhelian (Late Pennsylvanian) of Douro Basin (NW Portugal). Geological Journal 54, 1567–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Šimůnek, Z, Cleal, CJ, Vallois, B, Domingos, R and Sa, AA (2021b) On a new species of the calamitalean fossil-genus Annularia from the Douro Basin (lower Gzhelian; NW Portugal). Historical Biology 33, 258−67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Šimůnek, Z, Pšenička, J, Sá, AA, Domingos, R, Carneiro, A and Flores, D (2014a) New paleobotanical data on the Portuguese Pennsylvanian (Douro Carboniferous Basin, NW Portugal). Comunicações Geológicas 101, 409−14.Google Scholar
Correia, P, Šimůnek, Z and Sá, AA (2021a) The equisetalean Iberisetum wegeneri gen. nov., sp. nov. from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Portugal. Historical Biology 33, 3495−505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, P, Šimůnek, Z, Sá, AA and Flores, D (2018) A new Late Pennsylvanian floral assemblage from the Douro Basin, Portugal. Geological Journal 53, 2507–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettingshausen, C von (1852) Steinkohlenflora von Stradonitz in Böhmen. Abhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt I, 1–18.Google Scholar
Feistmantel, K (1879) Eine neue Pflanzengattung aus Böhmischen Steinkohlenschichten. Sitzungsberichte der königl. Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften in Prag, pp. 298–303.Google Scholar
Gao, Z and Thomas, BA (1994) A new species of Discinites from the Lower Permian of China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 81, 185–92.Google Scholar
Heckel, PH and Clayton, G (2006) The Carboniferous System. Use of the new official names for the subsystems, series, and stages. Geologica Acta 4, 403–7.Google Scholar
Hirmer, M (1940) Noeggerathiineae. In Die Karbon Flora des Saargebietes, Abt. 3. Filicales and Verwood (eds Hirmer, M & Gothan, P), pp. 3–44. Palaeontographica, B, Suppl. Band A.Google Scholar
Kidston, R (1923) Fossil plants of the Carboniferous rocks of Great Britain. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Palaeontology II(Part 3), 200−74, pls. XLVIII−LXVIII.Google Scholar
Laveine, JP (1977) Report on the Westphalian D. In Symposium on Carboniferous Stratigraphy (Czechoslovakia – 1973) (eds Holub, VM & Wagner, RH), pp. 71–87. Prague: Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Laveine, JP, Coquel, R and Loboziak, S (1977) Phylogénie générale des Calliptéridacées (Pteridospermopsida). Géobios 10, 757–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, RL (1973) Lacoea, a Lower Pennsylvanian noeggerathialian cone from Illinois. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 15, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, RL (1980) Lacoea with sporangia and Calamospora spores from Rock Island, Illinois. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 29, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, RL and Pfefferkorn, HW (1977) An Early Pennsylvanian flora with Megalopteris and Noeggerathiales from West-Central Illinois, Vol. Circular no. 500. Urbana: Illinois State Geological Survey, Circular 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, RL and Trask, CB (1985) Early Pennsylvanian Paleotopography and Depositional Environments, Rock Island County, Illinois. Illinois: Illinois State Geological Survey, Guidebook, 18, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Loureiro, JP, Correia, P, Nel, A and Pinto de Jesus, A (2010) Lusitaneura covensis nov. gen. & nov. sp., first Caloneurodea from the Carboniferous of Portugal (Insecta: Pterygota: Panorthoptera). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (n.s.) 46, 242–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyen, SV (1987) Fundamentals of Palaeobotany. London: Chapman and Hall, 432 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nĕmejc, F (1937) On Discinites K. Feistmantel. Bulletin International de l’Académie des Sciences de Boheme 2, 1–7.Google Scholar
Nĕmejc, F (1941) Further fructifications of the type Discinites in addition to some remarks on the Archaeopteriden of the Middle Bohemian coal basins. Mitt. Tschechoslowakische Akademie der Wissenschaften 19, 1–13.Google Scholar
Nĕmejc, F (1950) The natural systematic of plants in the light of the present palaeontological documents. Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae 6B, 1–83.Google Scholar
Novikoff, A and Barabasz-Krasny, B (2015) System of embryophytes. In Modern Plant Systematics (eds Novikoff, A & Barabasz-Krasny, B), pp. 23–63. Lviv, Ukraine: Liga-Pres. https://www.phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ Google Scholar
Pfefferkorn, HW and Wang, J (2016) Paleoecology of Noeggerathiales, an enigmatic, extinct plant group of Carboniferous and Permian times. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 448, 141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto de Jesus, A (2001) Génese e evolução da Bacia Carbonífera do Douro (Estefaniano C inferior, NW de Portugal); Um Modelo. PhD thesis, Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto. Published thesis.Google Scholar
Pinto de Jesus, A (2003) Evolução sedimentar e tectónica da Bacia Carbonífera do Douro (Estefaniano C inferior, NW de Portugal). Caderno do Laboratorio Xeolóxico de Laxe Coruña 28, 107–25.Google Scholar
Pšenička, J, Correia, P, Šimůnek, Z, Sá, AA, Murphy, JB and Flores, D (2017) Revision of Ilfeldia and establishment of Ovulepteris gen. nov. from the Pennsylvanian of Europe, with a discussion on their concepts. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 236, 59−73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pšenička, J, Zodrow, EL, Mastalerz, M and Bek, J (2005) Functional groups of fossil marattialeans: chemotaxonomic implications for Pennsylvanian tree ferns and pteridophylls. lnternational Journal of Coal Geology 61, 259–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, CB (1946) A Pennsylvanian florule from the Forkston Coal in the Dutch Mountain outlier, Northeastern Pennsylvania. Professional Paper (U.S. Geological Survey) 210-B, 17–27.Google Scholar
Remy, W and Remy, R (1977) Die Floren des Erdaltertunms. Essen: Verlag Glückauf GmbH, 468 pp.Google Scholar
Schimper, WP (1869−1874) Traité de paléontologie végétale ou la flore du monde primitif dans ses raports avec les formations géologiques et la flore du monde actuel, Vols. 1–3 atlas. Paris: Baillère et fils. 1: 1−740, pls. 1−53, 1869. 2: 1−522, pls. 54−75, 1870; 522−968, pls. 76−90, 1872. 3: IV + 1−896, pls. 91−110, 1874.Google Scholar
Shute, CH and Cleal, CJ (1986) Palaeobotany in museums. Geological Curator 4, 553–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stur, DRJ (1875) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flora der Vorwelt–Die Culm Flora, Teil 1. Die Culm Flora des mährisch-schleischen Dachschiefers. Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt 8, 1–106.Google Scholar
Taylor, TN, Taylor, EL and Krings, M (2009) Paleobotany. The biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants, second edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1230 pp.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1941) W. de Lima e a Flora fóssil do Permo-Carbónico português. Fragmentos de uma monografia inédita, coordenados. Comunicações dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal XXII, 1–17.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1942a) O Carbónico das margens do Douro e seus caracteres paleontológicos. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciências Naturais (Lisboa) 13(Supl. 3), 121–33.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1942b) Sobre a existência de duas formações carboníferas de idades diferentes nos arredores do Porto. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciências Naturais (Lisboa) 13(Supl. 3), 517–26.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1942c) Notas sobre a flora westefaliana de alguns afloramentos carboníferos dos arredores do Pôrto. Porto: Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1943) Sur un “Rhacopteris” du Stéphanien Portugais. Comunicações dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal XXIV, 1–5, pls. I−VI.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1944) O Antracolítico continental português. (Estratigrafia e Tectónica). PhD thesis, Universidade do Porto. Published thesis.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1945) O Antracolítico continental português. (Estratigrafia e Tectónica). Boletim da Sociedade Geológica de Portugal (Porto) 5, 1−139.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1951) Plantas fósseis do Permo-Carbónico português. II. Comunicações dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal XXXII, 1–43.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C (1954) Notas sobre Geologia de Portugal. O Sistema Permo-Carbónico. Lisboa: Serviços Geológicos de Portugal.Google Scholar
Wang, J (2000) Discovery of a petrified Discinites (Noeggerathiales) cone from the Permian of Shizuishan, Ningxia, China: D. sinensis sp. nov. Chinese Science Bulletin 45, 560–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J, Hilton, J, Pfefferkorn, HW, Wang, S, Zhang, Y, Bek, J, Pšenička, J, Seyfullah, LJ and Dilcher, D (2021) Ancient noeggerathialean reveals the seed plant sister group diversified alongside the primary seed plant radiation. PNAS 118, e2013442118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Pfefferkorn, HW and Bek, J (2009) Paratingia wudensis sp. nov., a whole noeggerathialean plant preserved in an earliest Permian air fall tuff in Inner Mongolia, China. American Journal of Botany 96, 1676–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J and Shen, G (2000) A new species of Discinites (Noeggerathiales) from the Upper Permian of Weibei Coalfield, North China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 110, 175–90.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Zhang, G, Bek, J and Pfefferkorn, HW (2004) A new morphological type of operculate microspore, Discinispora gen. nov., from the Permian petrified Noeggerathialean strobilus Discinites sinensis Wang. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 128, 229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, RH (1966) Palaeobotanical dating of Upper Carboniferous folding phases in N.W. Spain. Memorias del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Tomo LXVI, 169 pp.Google Scholar
Wagner, RH (1971) The Westphalian D floras of the Olloniego and Esperanza formations in the Central Asturian Coalfield. Trabajos de Geología (Oviedo) 4, 461–506.Google Scholar
Wagner, RH (1983) The palaeogeographical and age relationships of the Portuguese Carboniferous floras with those of other parts of the Western Iberian Peninsula. In The Carboniferous of Portugal (eds Lemos de Sousa, MJ & Oliveira, JT), Vol. 29, pp. 153–77. Lisboa: Memórias dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal.Google Scholar
Wagner, RH (1984) Megafloral zones of the Carboniferous. In Neuvième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère (eds Sutherland, PK & Manger, WL), Vol. 2, pp. 109–34. Illinois.Google Scholar
Wagner, RH and Álvarez-Vázquez, C (2010) The Carboniferous floras of the Iberian Peninsula: a synthesis with geological connotations. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 162, 239–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, RH and Lemos de Sousa, MJ (1982a) A middle Westphalian flora from the Alvarelhos strip near the Serra de Bougado, Santo Tirso, North Portugal. Comunicações dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal 68, 257–66.Google Scholar
Wagner, RH and Lemos de Sousa, MJ (1982b) Systematics and distribution of Linopteris florini Teixeira and Linopteris gangamopteroides (De Stefani) Wagner. Comunicações dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal 68, 247–56.Google Scholar
Wagner, RH and Lemos de Sousa, MJ (1983) The Carboniferous megafloras of Portugal – A revision of identifications and discussion of stratigraphic ages. In The Carboniferous of Portugal (eds Lemos de Sousa, MJ & Oliveira, JT), Vol. 29, pp. 127–52. Lisboa: Memórias dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal.Google Scholar
Yang, Y, Wang, SJ and Wang, J (2023) Stem anatomy confirms Tingia unita Is a Progymnosperm. Biology 12, 494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmermann, W (1959) Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen, 2nd edition. Stuttgart: Fischer, 777 pp.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Locality map of the Ervedosa’s (Estrada Dom Miguel) fossil site. Modified from Correia et al. (2020, Fig. 1).

Figure 1

Plate I. Holotype MGUTAD-1121 of Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. from the Ervedosa’s outcrops (upper Westphalian D/upper Asturian, Middle Pennsylvanian) of the road Dom Miguel, Seixo (Fânzeres) region, Gondomar, northwestern Portugal. 1 – General view of the holotype (white arrows indicate a very developed petiole-like, a possible penultimate rachis). 2–3 – Enlargement of rectangular boxes in Figure 1, showing details of foliage (white arrows indicate the petiolate attachment of the pinnules on an ultimate rachis). 4 – Enlargement of rectangular box in Figure 1, displaying a putative ‘noeggerathialean’ macrosporangium with a probable micropyle (highlighted in dashed white circle). 5 – Putative ‘noeggerathialean’ macrosporangium, exhibiting a multicelled gametophyte extending from ruptured spore wall (white arrows) (holotype counterpart; see Plate II, 2B).

Figure 2

Plate II. Counterpart (isotype MGUTAD-1122) of the holotype specimen of Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. 1 – Highlight of partially preserved foliage and venation of the frond, displaying highlighting an associated ‘noeggerathialean’ macrosporangium-like and an oval-shaped structure of undetermined (highlighted in rectangular boxes). 2 – Interpretive line drawing of the frond foliage and venation (A), macrosporangia showing a multicelled gametophyte extending from ruptured spore wall (B), and unknown plant fragment (C) (enlargement of rectangular boxes in Figure 1).

Figure 3

Table 1. Summary of the main characteristics of foliage for comparison between Palaeopteridium andrenelii sp. nov. and other similar noeggerathialean fossil taxa