Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-54gsr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T09:41:26.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the directional nature of stratigraphic correlation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

John C. Tipper
John C. Tipper
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In every correlation exercise the diachroneity of the lithostratigraphic boundaries determines the discrepancy between lithostratigraphic correlation and time-correlation. Here it is shown that diachroneity varies in degree as a simple function of the direction in which correlation is made, and hence that stratigraphic correlation must take that direction into account. When the direction of correlation is not known, a sound strategy for time-correlation of lithostratigraphic boundaries is to assume that each is at its most diachronous.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 149 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ager, D. V. 1973. The Nature of the Stratigraphic Record. London: Macmillan 114 pp.Google Scholar
Conaghan, P. J., Jones, J. G., McDonnell, K. L. & Royce, K. 1982. A dynamic fluvial model for the Sydney Basin. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia 29, 55–70.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. W. & Anderson, E. J. 1985. Punctuated aggradational cycles: a general hypothesis of episodic stratigraphic accumulation. Journal of Geology 93, 515–33.Google Scholar
Irwin, M. L. 1965. General theory of epeiric clear water sedimentation. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 49, 445–59.Google Scholar
Israelsky, M. C. 1949. Oscillation chart. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 33, 92–98.Google Scholar
Pitman, W. C. 1978. Relationship between eustacy and stratigraphic sequences of passive margins. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 89, 1389–1403.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salin, Yu. S. 1974. An analysis of the methods of stratigraphic synchronization. Soviet Geology and Geophysics 15, no. 4, 22–7.Google Scholar
Schwarzacher, W. 1975. Sedimentation Models and Quantitative Stratigraphy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 382 pp.Google Scholar
Sell, B. H., Brown, L. N. & Groves, R. D. 1972. Basal Jurassic sands of the Roma area. Queensland Government Mining Journal 73, 309–21.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. B. 1964. Time in Stratigraphy. New York: McGraw-Hill 365 pp.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. C. N. 1979. Regional stratigraphic analysis of the Gidgealpa Group, southern Cooper Basin, Australia. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of South Australia 49, 140 pp.Google Scholar
Tipper, J. C. 1983. Rates of sedimentation and stratigraphical completeness. Nature 302, 696–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vail, P. R., Todd, R. G. & Sangree, J. B. 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level 5. chronostratigraphic significance of seismic reflections. In Seismic Stratigraphy – Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration (ed. Payton, C. E.), pp. 99–116. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.Google Scholar