Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T17:49:14.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The numerical age of the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. C. Claoué-Long ,
P. J. Jones ,
J. Roberts  and
S. Maxwell
J. C. Claoué-Long
Affiliation:
Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra 2601, Australia
P. J. Jones
Affiliation:
Bureau of Mineral Resources, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
J. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Geology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
S. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Geology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The SHRIMP ion microprobe has been used to date zircons in a 1 cm thick bentonite located in the Hasselbachtal auxiliary global stratotype section through the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary in Germany, and a tuff located at a similar biostratigraphic level in Australia. Multiple replicate analyses have yielded indistinguishable ages, and indicate 353.2±4.0 Ma (2σ) as the age of the boundary. Obtaining an age for the boundary in the German reference section depended on the ability of SHRIMP to date a small sample and to target small areas of structurally complex zircons. Future refinements of the age of this boundary may depend on re-analysis of this uniquely placed bentonite, and this highlights the value of defining biostratigraphic stratotypes in the vicinity of known dateable horizons.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 129 , Issue 3 , May 1992 , pp. 281 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alberti, H., Groos-Uffenorde, H., Streel, M., Uffenorde, H. & Walliser, O. H. 1974. The stratigraphical significance of the Protognathodus fauna from Stockum (Devonian/Carboniferous boundary, Rhenish Schiefergebirge). Newsletters on Stratigraphy 3, 263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, T. 1988. Ammonoids from the Devonian-Carboniferous Boundary in the Hasselbach Valley (Northern Rhenish Slate Mountains). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 100, 193–213.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T., Bless, M. J. M., Brauckmann, C., Friman, L., Higgs, K., Keupp, H., Korn, D., Langer, W., Paproth, E., Racheboeuf, P., Stoppel, D., Streel, M. & Zakowa, H. 1984. Hasselbachtal, the section best displaying the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary beds in the Rhenish Massif (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 67, 181–91.Google Scholar
Bless, M. J. M., Simakov, K. V. & Streel, M. 1988. Advantages and disadvantages of a conodont-based or event-stratigraphic Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 100, 3–14.Google Scholar
Brauckmann, C. & Hahn, G. 1984. Trilobites as index fossils at the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 67, 11–14.Google Scholar
Compston, W., Williams, I. S. & Meyer, C. 1984. U-Pb geochronology of zircons from lunar breccia 73217 using a sensitive high mass-resolution ion microprobe. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, B525–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G. L. & Richards, J. R. 1975. Ore lead isotope ratios in a continuously changing Earth. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 28, 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Souza, H. A. F. 1982. Age data from Scotland and the Carboniferous time scale. In Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy (ed. Odin, G. S.), pp. 455–65. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Flajs, G. & Feist, R. 1988. Index conodonts, trilobites and environment of the Devonian-Carboniferous Boundary beds at La Serre (Montagne Noire), France. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 100, 53–107.Google Scholar
Groos-Uffenorde, H. & Uffenorde, H. 1974. Zur Mikrofauna im höchsten Oberdevon und tiefen Unterkarbon im nördlichen Sauerland (Conodonta, Ostracoda, Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Notizblatt des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung zu Wiesbaden 102, 58–87.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L. E., Smith, A. G. & Smith, D. G. 1990. A Geologic Time Scale 1989. Cambridge University Press. 263 pp.Google Scholar
Higgs, K. & Steel, M. 1984. Spore stratigraphy at the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary in the northern ‘Rheinisches Schiefergebirge’, Germany. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 67, 157–79.Google Scholar
Jongmans, W. J. & Gothan, W. 1937. Betrachtungen über die Ergebnisser des zweiten Kongresses für Karbon Stratigraphie. Compte rendu, 2eme Congres International de Stratigraphie et de Geologie du Carbonifere, Heerlen, 1935, 1–40.Google Scholar
Korn, D. 1984. Die Goniatiten der Stockumer ImitocerasKalklinsen (Ammonoidea; Devon/Karbon-Grenze). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 67, 71–89.Google Scholar
Long, J. A. 1988. New palaeoniscoid fishes from the Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous of Victoria. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists Memoir 7, 1–64.Google Scholar
Marsden, M. A. H. 1988. Upper Devonian-Carboniferous. In Geology of Victoria (eds Douglas, J. G. and Ferguson, J. A.), pp. 145–94. Geological Society of Australia, Victorian Division, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Mory, A. 1978. The Geology of Brushy Hill, Glenbawn, New South Wales. Journal of the Royal Society of New South Wales 111, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mory, A. J. & Crane, D. T. 1982. Early Carboniferous Siphonodella (Conodonta) faunas from eastern Australia. Alcheringa 6, 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odin, G. S. (ed.) 1982. Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy. London: Wiley. 1094 pp.Google Scholar
Paproth, E. 1980. The Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Lethaia 13, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paproth, E. 1989. Working Group on the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, IUGS Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 7, 18.Google Scholar
Paproth, E. & Streel, M. 1984. Precision and practicability: on the definition of the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 67, 55–258.Google Scholar
Richards, J. R. & Singleton, O. P. 1981. Palaeozoic Victoria, Australia: igneous rocks, ages and their intepretation. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia 28, 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, J. & Oversby, B. S. 1974. The Lower Carboniferous geology of the Rouchel district, New South Wales. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin 147, 1–93.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., Ziegler, W., Leuteritz, K. & Brill, S. M. 1978. Phylogeny, speciation, and zonation of Siphonodella (Conodonta, Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous). Newsletters on Stratigraphy 7, 102–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snelling, N. J. (ed.) 1985. The Chronology of the Geological Record. Geological Society Memoir no. 10, 343 pp.Google Scholar
Steiger, R. H. & Jäger, E. 1977. Subcommission on Geochronology: convention on the use of decay constants in geo-and cosmochronology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 36, 359–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voges, A. 1959. Conodonten aus dem Unterkarbon I und II (Gattendorfia-und Pericyclus-Stufe) des Sauerlandes. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 33, 266–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voges, A. 1960. Die Bedeutung der Conodonten für die Stratigraphie des Unterkarbon I und II Gattendorfia-und Pericyclus-Stufeim Sauerland. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen 3, 197–228.Google Scholar
Vöhringer, E. 1960. Die Goniatiten der unterkarbonischen Gattendorfia-Stufeim Sauerland. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen 3, 107–95.Google Scholar
Westoll, T. S. 1977. Cheviot and Southern Scotland. In A Correlation of the Devonian Rocks in the British Isles. (eds House, M. R., Richardson, J. B., Chaloner, W. G., Allen, J. R. L., Holland, C. H. and Westoll, T. S.), pp. 70–71. Special Report no. 8, Geological Society of London.Google Scholar
Williams, I. S. & Claesson, S. 1987. Isotopic evidence for the Precambrian provenance and Caledonian metamorphism of high grade paragneisses from the Seve Nappes, Scandinavian Caledonides. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 97, 205–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I. S., Tetley, N. W., Compston, W. & McDougall, I. 1982. A comparison of K-Ar and Rb-Sr ages of rapidly cooled igneous rocks: two points in the Palaeozoic time scale re-evaluated. Journal of the Geological Society, London 139, 557–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C. 1988. Devonian-Carboniferous boundary in Nanbiancung, Guilin, China - aspects and records. Beijing, China: Science Press. 379 pp.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1969. Eine neue Conodontenfauna aus dem höchsten Oberdevon. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen 17, 343–60.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. & Sandberg, C. A. 1984. Important candidate sections for stratotype of conodont based Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 67, 231–9.Google Scholar